Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

trumpcare is back

135678

Comments

  • Alexis
    Alexis Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,449 Founders Club
    I'm all for pre existing conditions. I like to wreck my car and then pay for collision coverage and not waste money on homeowners insurance until after my house burns down.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    Alexis said:

    I'm all for pre existing conditions. I like to wreck my car and then pay for collision coverage and not waste money on homeowners insurance until after my house burns down.

    Sure. Because that's the same thing.

  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    why yes. Yes it is.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Alexis said:

    I'm all for pre existing conditions. I like to wreck my car and then pay for collision coverage and not waste money on homeowners insurance until after my house burns down.

    if "pre existing conditions" like fucking acne weren't abused by companies to avoid paying perfectly reasonable claims you'd have more of a point.

  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Good. Pre existing conditions was bad law. It hurt everyone and didn't solve anything

    This really will be Trump care now that Ryan has failed so miserably.

    This one sounds like it has Rand Paul's fingerprints on it. Good round of golf.

    People forget that hospitals have charities and endowments and pay for a lot of indigent patients. Tax payers can pay the rest and come out ahead.

    We tried it the Obama way and it failed.

    @Foxnews, true?
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468
    Alexis said:

    I'm all for pre existing conditions. I like to wreck my car and then pay for collision coverage and not waste money on homeowners insurance until after my house burns down.

    I hate moronic motherfuckers.

    Do you think people choose to get multiple sclerosis or Crohn's? Do you think that people who lose a genetic lottery should have to remain continuously employed (even though the losing the genetic lottery part might make that difficult) or pay COBRA rates for their insurance if they do lose their jobs?

    Your analogy is less-than-dimwitted.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,468

    Good. Pre existing conditions was bad law. It hurt everyone and didn't solve anything

    This really will be Trump care now that Ryan has failed so miserably.

    This one sounds like it has Rand Paul's fingerprints on it. Good round of golf.

    People forget that hospitals have charities and endowments and pay for a lot of indigent patients. Tax payers can pay the rest and come out ahead.

    We tried it the Obama way and it failed.

    EAT THE RICH

    @RaceBannon , true?!?!!?!!12111!?!
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,788 Founders Club
    Notice how the counter arguments have nothing to do with what I actually wrote. Because I'm right and all you have is the usual bull shit about how much you care about the poor even though we all know you don't. You just want to whip up your fellow low information voters into some frenzy over leaving people to die which is a bunch of bull shit and you know it.

    We can deal with the minority of folks with pre existing conditions with out fucking over everyone else to do it which is what Obamacare did and why it is going to fail.

    Rip me all you want but that fact isn't changing
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    Notice how the counter arguments have nothing to do with what I actually wrote. Because I'm right and all you have is the usual bull shit about how much you care about the poor even though we all know you don't. You just want to whip up your fellow low information voters into some frenzy over leaving people to die which is a bunch of bull shit and you know it.

    We can deal with the minority of folks with pre existing conditions with out fucking over everyone else to do it which is what Obamacare did and why it is going to fail.

    Rip me all you want but that fact isn't changing

    You claim to have solved the preexisting condition issue through a magical and unsubstantiated combination of charity, endowment and tax dollars and then bemoan the substance of the counter-arguments? RaceBannonFS.

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Pre existing conditions clause has nothing to do with why Obamacare isn't doing as well as it should. First, you can't just sign up when you want. If you get cancer right now, you can't sign up until November when open enrollment begins. Second, prior to Obamacare, insurance companies could drop you if you got sick, that is bullshit. Third, the fix to Obamacare is to allow companies to have plans statewide, rather then silo them by county. That and a few other tweaks and it will be just fine.