FUCK clean water

On paper this looks bad but the EPA has also gotten way out of hand. In industrial areas you actually have to put in a system that artificially pumps oxygen into the water that runs off into your storm drains. Really?

Total bullshit crap like that is stupid. Then of course republicans will remove too many regulations and we get the same see-saw bullshit each election cycle. Both parties are retarded when it comes to policy.

greenblood said:

On paper this looks bad but the EPA has also gotten way out of hand. In industrial areas you actually have to put in a system that artificially pumps oxygen into the water that runs off into your storm drains. Really?

Total bullshit crap like that is stupid. Then of course republicans will remove too many regulations and we get the same see-saw bullshit each election cycle. Both parties are retarded when it comes to policy.

Why is this bad? Industrial runoff regularly causes anoxia, algae blooms, and kills off marine and aquatic populations downstream. Even most libertarians agree that there is no right to pollute.

greenblood said:

AZDuck said:

greenblood said:

On paper this looks bad but the EPA has also gotten way out of hand. In industrial areas you actually have to put in a system that artificially pumps oxygen into the water that runs off into your storm drains. Really?

Total bullshit crap like that is stupid. Then of course republicans will remove too many regulations and we get the same see-saw bullshit each election cycle. Both parties are retarded when it comes to policy.

Why is this bad? Industrial runoff regularly causes anoxia, algae blooms, and kills off marine and aquatic populations downstream. Even most libertarians agree that there is no right to pollute.

So rain water that runs down your gutter into a parking lot drain, needs to have oxygen pumped into it, even though Leroy can wash his car and have his soapy water go freely through the neighborhood storm drain? OK!

Don't fuck with Leroy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2a5CjKOTlg

doogie said:

Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

States????

You must refer to liberal law number 1.


The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.

AZDuck said:

salemcoog said:

doogie said:

Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

States????

You must refer to liberal law number 1.


The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.

Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTH

OK!!!

Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.

So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.

Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.

Either way.

AZDuck said:

salemcoog said:

AZDuck said:

salemcoog said:

doogie said:

Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

States????

You must refer to liberal law number 1.


The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.

Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTH

OK!!!

Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.

So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.

Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.

Either way.

you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.

Your the Kook that irrelevantly responded with some BS about WY having better representation than the states with 100 times their population in a thread about the impact of the scary rollback of environmental protections.

But OK!!!!

AlCzervik said:

Leave @Swaye out of this.

2001400ex said:

salemcoog said:

AZDuck said:

salemcoog said:

AZDuck said:

salemcoog said:

doogie said:

Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

States????

You must refer to liberal law number 1.


The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.

Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTH

OK!!!

Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.

So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.

Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.

Either way.

you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.

Your the Kook that irrelevantly responded with some BS about WY having better representation than the states with 100 times their population in a thread about the impact of the scary rollback of environmental protections.

But OK!!!!

It's clear you don't understand the Senate. Give the Constitution a read. Then utilize comprehension skills.

It's funny watching someone like you argue talking points you when don't even have a basic understanding of how government works.

Ironic

HoustonHusky said:

Its always fun to cry false tears over regulations Obama thought were important enough that he implemented them only after his 8 years in office...

And yes, Trump (and not Obama) should be the one worried about the EPA and polluting waters...

EPA killed the Animas river twice. They were told by local experts it would happen if the EPA did it their way and the EPA went ahead and did it not once but twice. Everything dead. I've rafted that river. Durango is a great place. Why aren't those responsible in jail? If it were you or me or a business we would be.

salemcoog said:

2001400ex said:

salemcoog said:

AZDuck said:

salemcoog said:

AZDuck said:

salemcoog said:

doogie said:

Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

States????

You must refer to liberal law number 1.


The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.

Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTH

OK!!!

Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.

So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.

Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.

Either way.

you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.

Your the Kook that irrelevantly responded with some BS about WY having better representation than the states with 100 times their population in a thread about the impact of the scary rollback of environmental protections.

But OK!!!!

It's clear you don't understand the Senate. Give the Constitution a read. Then utilize comprehension skills.

It's funny watching someone like you argue talking points you when don't even have a basic understanding of how government works.

Wow. You really are simple Jim aren't you.

First of all there's this other side of the House called the House of Reps. Second within these Houses there are things called Committees. And there are chairs of these committees that wield alot of power in what bills come to the floor and what $$$ get allocated to where...

Fuck nevermind. It's like teaching a ferret to play chess.

Quit bringing up Wyoming when Wyomingites have more influence in Congress than Californians, on a per-capita basis, and therefore have more "people in Washington" to know what's best for them.

AZDuck said:

@salemcoog dis thred

Is it time for you to meltdown again....



Say like with an anime sammich

AZDuck said:

salemcoog said:

2001400ex said:

salemcoog said:

AZDuck said:

salemcoog said:

AZDuck said:

salemcoog said:

doogie said:

Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

States????

You must refer to liberal law number 1.


The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.

Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTH

OK!!!

Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.

So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.

Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.

Either way.

you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.

Your the Kook that irrelevantly responded with some BS about WY having better representation than the states with 100 times their population in a thread about the impact of the scary rollback of environmental protections.

But OK!!!!

It's clear you don't understand the Senate. Give the Constitution a read. Then utilize comprehension skills.

It's funny watching someone like you argue talking points you when don't even have a basic understanding of how government works.

Wow. You really are simple Jim aren't you.

First of all there's this other side of the House called the House of Reps. Second within these Houses there are things called Committees. And there are chairs of these committees that wield alot of power in what bills come to the floor and what $$$ get allocated to where...

Fuck nevermind. It's like teaching a ferret to play chess.

Quit bringing up Wyoming when Wyomingites have more influence in Congress than Californians, on a per-capita basis, and therefore have more "people in Washington" to know what's best for them.

I like Turtles.

So buy a Brita