Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

FUCK clean water

24

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,415 Founders Club
    Pull the covers over your head little jimmy and be very afraid
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    doogie said:

    Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

    States????

    You must refer to liberal law number 1.


    The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    salemcoog said:

    doogie said:

    Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

    States????

    You must refer to liberal law number 1.


    The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.
    Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    AZDuck said:

    salemcoog said:

    doogie said:

    Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

    States????

    You must refer to liberal law number 1.


    The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.
    Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTH
    OK!!!

    Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.

    So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.

    Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.

    Either way.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    salemcoog said:

    AZDuck said:

    salemcoog said:

    doogie said:

    Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

    States????

    You must refer to liberal law number 1.


    The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.
    Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTH
    OK!!!

    Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.

    So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.

    Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.

    Either way.
    you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919
    AZDuck said:

    salemcoog said:

    AZDuck said:

    salemcoog said:

    doogie said:

    Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

    States????

    You must refer to liberal law number 1.


    The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.
    Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTH
    OK!!!

    Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.

    So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.

    Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.

    Either way.
    you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.
    Your the Kook that irrelevantly responded with some BS about WY having better representation than the states with 100 times their population in a thread about the impact of the scary rollback of environmental protections.

    But OK!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming
    - You

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    AlCzervik said:

    image

    Leave @Swaye out of this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    salemcoog said:

    AZDuck said:

    salemcoog said:

    AZDuck said:

    salemcoog said:

    doogie said:

    Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

    States????

    You must refer to liberal law number 1.


    The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.
    Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTH
    OK!!!

    Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.

    So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.

    Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.

    Either way.
    you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.
    Your the Kook that irrelevantly responded with some BS about WY having better representation than the states with 100 times their population in a thread about the impact of the scary rollback of environmental protections.

    But OK!!!!
    It's clear you don't understand the Senate. Give the Constitution a read. Then utilize comprehension skills.

    It's funny watching someone like you argue talking points you when don't even have a basic understanding of how government works.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,762
    2001400ex said:

    salemcoog said:

    AZDuck said:

    salemcoog said:

    AZDuck said:

    salemcoog said:

    doogie said:

    Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?

    States????

    You must refer to liberal law number 1.


    The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.
    Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTH
    OK!!!

    Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.

    So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.

    Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.

    Either way.
    you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.
    Your the Kook that irrelevantly responded with some BS about WY having better representation than the states with 100 times their population in a thread about the impact of the scary rollback of environmental protections.

    But OK!!!!
    It's clear you don't understand the Senate. Give the Constitution a read. Then utilize comprehension skills.

    It's funny watching someone like you argue talking points you when don't even have a basic understanding of how government works.
    Ironic
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter