Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
FUCK clean water
Comments
-
FUCK dirty sluts.
-
Now that he is sober we are actually finding out Swaye is an Italian guy that just didn't shower very often.topdawgnc said: -
-
EPA killed the Animas river twice. They were told by local experts it would happen if the EPA did it their way and the EPA went ahead and did it not once but twice. Everything dead. I've rafted that river. Durango is a great place. Why aren't those responsible in jail? If it were you or me or a business we would be.HoustonHusky said:Its always fun to cry false tears over regulations Obama thought were important enough that he implemented them only after his 8 years in office...
And yes, Trump (and not Obama) should be the one worried about the EPA and polluting waters...
-
Wow. You really are simple Jim aren't you.2001400ex said:
It's clear you don't understand the Senate. Give the Constitution a read. Then utilize comprehension skills.salemcoog said:
Your the Kook that irrelevantly responded with some BS about WY having better representation than the states with 100 times their population in a thread about the impact of the scary rollback of environmental protections.AZDuck said:
you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.salemcoog said:
OK!!!AZDuck said:
Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTHsalemcoog said:
States????doogie said:Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?
You must refer to liberal law number 1.
The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.
Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.
So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.
Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.
Either way.
But OK!!!!
It's funny watching someone like you argue talking points you when don't even have a basic understanding of how government works.
First of all there's this other side of the House called the House of Reps. Second within these Houses there are things called Committees. And there are chairs of these committees that wield alot of power in what bills come to the floor and what $$$ get allocated to where...
Fuck nevermind. It's like teaching a ferret to play chess. -
Quit bringing up Wyoming when Wyomingites have more influence in Congress than Californians, on a per-capita basis, and therefore have more "people in Washington" to know what's best for them.salemcoog said:
Wow. You really are simple Jim aren't you.2001400ex said:
It's clear you don't understand the Senate. Give the Constitution a read. Then utilize comprehension skills.salemcoog said:
Your the Kook that irrelevantly responded with some BS about WY having better representation than the states with 100 times their population in a thread about the impact of the scary rollback of environmental protections.AZDuck said:
you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.salemcoog said:
OK!!!AZDuck said:
Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTHsalemcoog said:
States????doogie said:Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?
You must refer to liberal law number 1.
The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.
Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.
So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.
Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.
Either way.
But OK!!!!
It's funny watching someone like you argue talking points you when don't even have a basic understanding of how government works.
First of all there's this other side of the House called the House of Reps. Second within these Houses there are things called Committees. And there are chairs of these committees that wield alot of power in what bills come to the floor and what $$$ get allocated to where...
Fuck nevermind. It's like teaching a ferret to play chess. -
Only you would think to teach a ferret how to play chess.salemcoog said:
Wow. You really are simple Jim aren't you.2001400ex said:
It's clear you don't understand the Senate. Give the Constitution a read. Then utilize comprehension skills.salemcoog said:
Your the Kook that irrelevantly responded with some BS about WY having better representation than the states with 100 times their population in a thread about the impact of the scary rollback of environmental protections.AZDuck said:
you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.salemcoog said:
OK!!!AZDuck said:
Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTHsalemcoog said:
States????doogie said:Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?
You must refer to liberal law number 1.
The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.
Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.
So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.
Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.
Either way.
But OK!!!!
It's funny watching someone like you argue talking points you when don't even have a basic understanding of how government works.
First of all there's this other side of the House called the House of Reps. Second within these Houses there are things called Committees. And there are chairs of these committees that wield alot of power in what bills come to the floor and what $$$ get allocated to where...
Fuck nevermind. It's like teaching a ferret to play chess. -
Is it time for you to meltdown again....AZDuck said:
@salemcoog dis thred
Say like with an anime sammich
I like Turtles.AZDuck said:
Quit bringing up Wyoming when Wyomingites have more influence in Congress than Californians, on a per-capita basis, and therefore have more "people in Washington" to know what's best for them.salemcoog said:
Wow. You really are simple Jim aren't you.2001400ex said:
It's clear you don't understand the Senate. Give the Constitution a read. Then utilize comprehension skills.salemcoog said:
Your the Kook that irrelevantly responded with some BS about WY having better representation than the states with 100 times their population in a thread about the impact of the scary rollback of environmental protections.AZDuck said:
you're all over the fucking map, cooger. I can't keep up.salemcoog said:
OK!!!AZDuck said:
Wyoming has much better representation in Washington than Washington State, California, Oregon, New York, or Massachusetts. HTHsalemcoog said:
States????doogie said:Can somebody kindly refer me to the part of the 'Rollback" that says states can't regulate water safety?
You must refer to liberal law number 1.
The States can't take care of themselves and will always need a strong bloated Central government to make all decisions for them. Because people in Washington DC will always know what's best for people in Wyoming.
Let us point out that runoff from asphalt causes more damage to watersheds than anything you think that the regulations rolled back will create And when you can stop other countries from using the Ocean as a garbage dump as well, get back to me on that.
So really if you truly cared about this you would sell the car, get on your bike, grow your own food and hemp to knit your own clothes to quit contributing to the problem.
Or blame some phantom regulation roll back.
Either way.
But OK!!!!
It's funny watching someone like you argue talking points you when don't even have a basic understanding of how government works.
First of all there's this other side of the House called the House of Reps. Second within these Houses there are things called Committees. And there are chairs of these committees that wield alot of power in what bills come to the floor and what $$$ get allocated to where...
Fuck nevermind. It's like teaching a ferret to play chess. -
Unfortunately the environment doesn't obey state borders.TierbsHsotBoobs said:I support any and all efforts of the red states to pollute themselves to death.
-
So buy a Brita
