Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Just Another Night Game?
Comments
-
Your doog is showingTailgater said:
Put that pass play for a TD in stop-motion on the VCR as I had to do a couple of times for my poor loser Cornhusker step dad(R.I.P) and you'll clearly see that it was a great call by that official who had the best view of it. It was an incredible call, but an accurate one and proof-positive that we don't need no stinking instant replay.uw2010 said:
How the hell did they rule the pass at 1:20 as a catch?He_Needs_More_Time said:RavennaDawg said:
Walking into the new stadium you see the black and white photos with explanations, and one on the south side refers to the 1992 Nebraska game being the first night game at HS.He_Needs_More_Time said:
They always said that was the first night game since 1985 if you recall at the time.RavennaDawg said:Is a 5:00pm game a night game or not?
I hear that the 1992 game vs Nebraska was the first night game at Husky Stadium, but the Thurman Thomas/Lou Rawls game was a 5:00 start, which I thought was the first night game, but I guess it was not, so this Colorado game at 5:00 in the dark will not be a night game. Or something like that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvIdBNXkVB0
They are dumb fucks.
-
I just teared up. I can't watch anymore highlights, just like I can't buy DJ's books about the Golden Years. Too infuriating.He_Needs_More_Time said:RavennaDawg said:
Walking into the new stadium you see the black and white photos with explanations, and one on the south side refers to the 1992 Nebraska game being the first night game at HS.He_Needs_More_Time said:
They always said that was the first night game since 1985 if you recall at the time.RavennaDawg said:Is a 5:00pm game a night game or not?
I hear that the 1992 game vs Nebraska was the first night game at Husky Stadium, but the Thurman Thomas/Lou Rawls game was a 5:00 start, which I thought was the first night game, but I guess it was not, so this Colorado game at 5:00 in the dark will not be a night game. Or something like that.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvIdBNXkVB0
They are dumb fucks. -
I'm aware the ref called it a TD and that it counted on the scoreboard. The point was that it was a horrible call.topdawgnc said:
I'm sorry.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm sorry, but Kralick doesn't even have the ball when he is done sliding. And yes, we do need replay. The refs fuck up too many calls not to have it. I think it can be a little excessive at times, but it has done more good than bad.Tailgater said:
Put that pass play for a TD in stop-motion on the VCR as I had to do a couple of times for my poor loser Cornhusker step dad(R.I.P) and you'll clearly see that it was a great call by that official who had the best view of it. It was an incredible call, but an accurate one and proof-positive that we don't need no stinking instant replay.uw2010 said:
How the hell did they rule the pass at 1:20 as a catch?He_Needs_More_Time said:RavennaDawg said:
Walking into the new stadium you see the black and white photos with explanations, and one on the south side refers to the 1992 Nebraska game being the first night game at HS.He_Needs_More_Time said:
They always said that was the first night game since 1985 if you recall at the time.RavennaDawg said:Is a 5:00pm game a night game or not?
I hear that the 1992 game vs Nebraska was the first night game at Husky Stadium, but the Thurman Thomas/Lou Rawls game was a 5:00 start, which I thought was the first night game, but I guess it was not, so this Colorado game at 5:00 in the dark will not be a night game. Or something like that.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvIdBNXkVB0
They are dumb fucks.
The referee and the scoreboard says he caught it.
-
But stop action on a home version VCR clearly shows that the Husky receiver had possession of the ball an instant before leaving the endzone as his body slid past the endline and that's all that was needed to score a TD then before instant replay and especially now with it.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm sorry, but Kralick doesn't even have the ball when he is done sliding. And yes, we do need replay. The refs fuck up too many calls not to have it. I think it can be a little excessive at times, but it has done more good than bad.Tailgater said:
Put that pass play for a TD in stop-motion on the VCR as I had to do a couple of times for my poor loser Cornhusker step dad(R.I.P) and you'll clearly see that it was a great call by that official who had the best view of it. It was an incredible call, but an accurate one and proof-positive that we don't need no stinking instant replay.uw2010 said:
How the hell did they rule the pass at 1:20 as a catch?He_Needs_More_Time said:RavennaDawg said:
Walking into the new stadium you see the black and white photos with explanations, and one on the south side refers to the 1992 Nebraska game being the first night game at HS.He_Needs_More_Time said:
They always said that was the first night game since 1985 if you recall at the time.RavennaDawg said:Is a 5:00pm game a night game or not?
I hear that the 1992 game vs Nebraska was the first night game at Husky Stadium, but the Thurman Thomas/Lou Rawls game was a 5:00 start, which I thought was the first night game, but I guess it was not, so this Colorado game at 5:00 in the dark will not be a night game. Or something like that.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvIdBNXkVB0
They are dumb fucks.
Sure, we need instant slow motion/stop action TV replay in football like a dead cat needs an enema. Like three weeks ago when the Sun Devil receiver scored as his prone perfectly horizontal body slowly floated in stop-action TV replay to the earth out-of-bounds including hands clasping the ball while his elbow was the only part of his entire body that touched down in bounds. The point isn't that he didn't make a great athletic maneuver, which he did like a ballerina, but that only stop-action TV replay could show anybody other than insects in the grass that the entire length of his out-of-bounds body including the clasped ball was not more than one stinking inch above the turf at the exact instant when his elbow touched the endzone. This was clearly a TD that only a instant TV replay machine with camera perfectly located could ever see.
Death to TV instant replay officiating or death to real human football........ take your choice. Like the weather or any act-of-god, bad or poor officiating is part of The Game. Change it with inhuman technology and everybody loses, not just the poor losers who blame their incompetence in playing a losing game on poor officiating.
-
Learn the rules, TPOTailgater said:
But stop action on a home version VCR clearly shows that the Husky receiver had possession of the ball an instant before leaving the endzone as his body slid past the endline and that's all that was needed to score a TD then before instant replay and especially now with it.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm sorry, but Kralick doesn't even have the ball when he is done sliding. And yes, we do need replay. The refs fuck up too many calls not to have it. I think it can be a little excessive at times, but it has done more good than bad.Tailgater said:
Put that pass play for a TD in stop-motion on the VCR as I had to do a couple of times for my poor loser Cornhusker step dad(R.I.P) and you'll clearly see that it was a great call by that official who had the best view of it. It was an incredible call, but an accurate one and proof-positive that we don't need no stinking instant replay.uw2010 said:
How the hell did they rule the pass at 1:20 as a catch?He_Needs_More_Time said:RavennaDawg said:
Walking into the new stadium you see the black and white photos with explanations, and one on the south side refers to the 1992 Nebraska game being the first night game at HS.He_Needs_More_Time said:
They always said that was the first night game since 1985 if you recall at the time.RavennaDawg said:Is a 5:00pm game a night game or not?
I hear that the 1992 game vs Nebraska was the first night game at Husky Stadium, but the Thurman Thomas/Lou Rawls game was a 5:00 start, which I thought was the first night game, but I guess it was not, so this Colorado game at 5:00 in the dark will not be a night game. Or something like that.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvIdBNXkVB0
They are dumb fucks.
Sure, we need instant slow motion/stop action TV replay in football like a dead cat needs an enema. Like three weeks ago when the Sun Devil receiver scored as his prone perfectly horizontal body slowly floated in stop-action TV replay to the earth out-of-bounds including hands clasping the ball while his elbow was the only part of his entire body that touched down in bounds. The point isn't that he didn't make a great athletic maneuver, which he did like a ballerina, but that only stop-action TV replay could show anybody other than insects in the grass that the entire length of his out-of-bounds body including the clasped ball was not more than one stinking inch above the turf at the exact instant when his elbow touched the endzone. This was clearly a TD that only a instant TV replay machine with camera perfectly located could ever see.
Death to TV instant replay officiating or death to real human football........ take your choice. Like the weather or any act-of-god, bad or poor officiating is part of The Game. Change it with inhuman technology and everybody loses, not just the poor losers who blame their incompetence in playing a losing game on poor officiating.
-
That's not a catch in the 21st century, and it isn't even close.Tailgater said:
But stop action on a home version VCR clearly shows that the Husky receiver had possession of the ball an instant before leaving the endzone as his body slid past the endline and that's all that was needed to score a TD then before instant replay and especially now with it.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm sorry, but Kralick doesn't even have the ball when he is done sliding. And yes, we do need replay. The refs fuck up too many calls not to have it. I think it can be a little excessive at times, but it has done more good than bad.Tailgater said:
Put that pass play for a TD in stop-motion on the VCR as I had to do a couple of times for my poor loser Cornhusker step dad(R.I.P) and you'll clearly see that it was a great call by that official who had the best view of it. It was an incredible call, but an accurate one and proof-positive that we don't need no stinking instant replay.uw2010 said:
How the hell did they rule the pass at 1:20 as a catch?He_Needs_More_Time said:RavennaDawg said:
Walking into the new stadium you see the black and white photos with explanations, and one on the south side refers to the 1992 Nebraska game being the first night game at HS.He_Needs_More_Time said:
They always said that was the first night game since 1985 if you recall at the time.RavennaDawg said:Is a 5:00pm game a night game or not?
I hear that the 1992 game vs Nebraska was the first night game at Husky Stadium, but the Thurman Thomas/Lou Rawls game was a 5:00 start, which I thought was the first night game, but I guess it was not, so this Colorado game at 5:00 in the dark will not be a night game. Or something like that.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvIdBNXkVB0
They are dumb fucks.
Sure, we need instant slow motion/stop action TV replay in football like a dead cat needs an enema. Like three weeks ago when the Sun Devil receiver scored as his prone perfectly horizontal body slowly floated in stop-action TV replay to the earth out-of-bounds including hands clasping the ball while his elbow was the only part of his entire body that touched down in bounds. The point isn't that he didn't make a great athletic maneuver, which he did like a ballerina, but that only stop-action TV replay could show anybody other than insects in the grass that the entire length of his out-of-bounds body including the clasped ball was not more than one stinking inch above the turf at the exact instant when his elbow touched the endzone. This was clearly a TD that only a instant TV replay machine with camera perfectly located could ever see.
Death to TV instant replay officiating or death to real human football........ take your choice. Like the weather or any act-of-god, bad or poor officiating is part of The Game. Change it with inhuman technology and everybody loses, not just the poor losers who blame their incompetence in playing a losing game on poor officiating.
It shouldn't have even been a catch then.
That back judge was horribly out of position. -
Or make the rules a lot simpler like they were in ancient times before universal TV coverage and the surge in NFL popularity. Retrograde the rules and game officials will have a 1000% better chance of getting it right......... guaranteed.
Disagree.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That's not a catch in the 21st century, and it isn't even close.Tailgater said:
But stop action on a home version VCR clearly shows that the Husky receiver had possession of the ball an instant before leaving the endzone as his body slid past the endline and that's all that was needed to score a TD then before instant replay and especially now with it.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm sorry, but Kralick doesn't even have the ball when he is done sliding. And yes, we do need replay. The refs fuck up too many calls not to have it. I think it can be a little excessive at times, but it has done more good than bad.Tailgater said:
Put that pass play for a TD in stop-motion on the VCR as I had to do a couple of times for my poor loser Cornhusker step dad(R.I.P) and you'll clearly see that it was a great call by that official who had the best view of it. It was an incredible call, but an accurate one and proof-positive that we don't need no stinking instant replay.uw2010 said:
How the hell did they rule the pass at 1:20 as a catch?He_Needs_More_Time said:RavennaDawg said:
Walking into the new stadium you see the black and white photos with explanations, and one on the south side refers to the 1992 Nebraska game being the first night game at HS.He_Needs_More_Time said:
They always said that was the first night game since 1985 if you recall at the time.RavennaDawg said:Is a 5:00pm game a night game or not?
I hear that the 1992 game vs Nebraska was the first night game at Husky Stadium, but the Thurman Thomas/Lou Rawls game was a 5:00 start, which I thought was the first night game, but I guess it was not, so this Colorado game at 5:00 in the dark will not be a night game. Or something like that.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvIdBNXkVB0
They are dumb fucks.
Sure, we need instant slow motion/stop action TV replay in football like a dead cat needs an enema. Like three weeks ago when the Sun Devil receiver scored as his prone perfectly horizontal body slowly floated in stop-action TV replay to the earth out-of-bounds including hands clasping the ball while his elbow was the only part of his entire body that touched down in bounds. The point isn't that he didn't make a great athletic maneuver, which he did like a ballerina, but that only stop-action TV replay could show anybody other than insects in the grass that the entire length of his out-of-bounds body including the clasped ball was not more than one stinking inch above the turf at the exact instant when his elbow touched the endzone. This was clearly a TD that only a instant TV replay machine with camera perfectly located could ever see.
Death to TV instant replay officiating or death to real human football........ take your choice. Like the weather or any act-of-god, bad or poor officiating is part of The Game. Change it with inhuman technology and everybody loses, not just the poor losers who blame their incompetence in playing a losing game on poor officiating.
It shouldn't have even been a catch then.
That back judge was horribly out of position.
-
SLITPPOTDTailgater said:Or make the rules a lot simpler like they were in ancient times before universal TV coverage and the surge in NFL popularity. Retrograde the rules and game officials will have a 1000% better chance of getting it right......... guaranteed.
Disagree.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That's not a catch in the 21st century, and it isn't even close.Tailgater said:
But stop action on a home version VCR clearly shows that the Husky receiver had possession of the ball an instant before leaving the endzone as his body slid past the endline and that's all that was needed to score a TD then before instant replay and especially now with it.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm sorry, but Kralick doesn't even have the ball when he is done sliding. And yes, we do need replay. The refs fuck up too many calls not to have it. I think it can be a little excessive at times, but it has done more good than bad.Tailgater said:
Put that pass play for a TD in stop-motion on the VCR as I had to do a couple of times for my poor loser Cornhusker step dad(R.I.P) and you'll clearly see that it was a great call by that official who had the best view of it. It was an incredible call, but an accurate one and proof-positive that we don't need no stinking instant replay.uw2010 said:
How the hell did they rule the pass at 1:20 as a catch?He_Needs_More_Time said:RavennaDawg said:
Walking into the new stadium you see the black and white photos with explanations, and one on the south side refers to the 1992 Nebraska game being the first night game at HS.He_Needs_More_Time said:
They always said that was the first night game since 1985 if you recall at the time.RavennaDawg said:Is a 5:00pm game a night game or not?
I hear that the 1992 game vs Nebraska was the first night game at Husky Stadium, but the Thurman Thomas/Lou Rawls game was a 5:00 start, which I thought was the first night game, but I guess it was not, so this Colorado game at 5:00 in the dark will not be a night game. Or something like that.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvIdBNXkVB0
They are dumb fucks.
Sure, we need instant slow motion/stop action TV replay in football like a dead cat needs an enema. Like three weeks ago when the Sun Devil receiver scored as his prone perfectly horizontal body slowly floated in stop-action TV replay to the earth out-of-bounds including hands clasping the ball while his elbow was the only part of his entire body that touched down in bounds. The point isn't that he didn't make a great athletic maneuver, which he did like a ballerina, but that only stop-action TV replay could show anybody other than insects in the grass that the entire length of his out-of-bounds body including the clasped ball was not more than one stinking inch above the turf at the exact instant when his elbow touched the endzone. This was clearly a TD that only a instant TV replay machine with camera perfectly located could ever see.
Death to TV instant replay officiating or death to real human football........ take your choice. Like the weather or any act-of-god, bad or poor officiating is part of The Game. Change it with inhuman technology and everybody loses, not just the poor losers who blame their incompetence in playing a losing game on poor officiating.
It shouldn't have even been a catch then.
That back judge was horribly out of position.
-
The catch rules are simple now. Hold onto the fucking football.Tailgater said:Or make the rules a lot simpler like they were in ancient times before universal TV coverage and the surge in NFL popularity. Retrograde the rules and game officials will have a 1000% better chance of getting it right......... guaranteed.
Disagree.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That's not a catch in the 21st century, and it isn't even close.Tailgater said:
But stop action on a home version VCR clearly shows that the Husky receiver had possession of the ball an instant before leaving the endzone as his body slid past the endline and that's all that was needed to score a TD then before instant replay and especially now with it.RoadDawg55 said:
I'm sorry, but Kralick doesn't even have the ball when he is done sliding. And yes, we do need replay. The refs fuck up too many calls not to have it. I think it can be a little excessive at times, but it has done more good than bad.Tailgater said:
Put that pass play for a TD in stop-motion on the VCR as I had to do a couple of times for my poor loser Cornhusker step dad(R.I.P) and you'll clearly see that it was a great call by that official who had the best view of it. It was an incredible call, but an accurate one and proof-positive that we don't need no stinking instant replay.uw2010 said:
How the hell did they rule the pass at 1:20 as a catch?He_Needs_More_Time said:RavennaDawg said:
Walking into the new stadium you see the black and white photos with explanations, and one on the south side refers to the 1992 Nebraska game being the first night game at HS.He_Needs_More_Time said:
They always said that was the first night game since 1985 if you recall at the time.RavennaDawg said:Is a 5:00pm game a night game or not?
I hear that the 1992 game vs Nebraska was the first night game at Husky Stadium, but the Thurman Thomas/Lou Rawls game was a 5:00 start, which I thought was the first night game, but I guess it was not, so this Colorado game at 5:00 in the dark will not be a night game. Or something like that.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvIdBNXkVB0
They are dumb fucks.
Sure, we need instant slow motion/stop action TV replay in football like a dead cat needs an enema. Like three weeks ago when the Sun Devil receiver scored as his prone perfectly horizontal body slowly floated in stop-action TV replay to the earth out-of-bounds including hands clasping the ball while his elbow was the only part of his entire body that touched down in bounds. The point isn't that he didn't make a great athletic maneuver, which he did like a ballerina, but that only stop-action TV replay could show anybody other than insects in the grass that the entire length of his out-of-bounds body including the clasped ball was not more than one stinking inch above the turf at the exact instant when his elbow touched the endzone. This was clearly a TD that only a instant TV replay machine with camera perfectly located could ever see.
Death to TV instant replay officiating or death to real human football........ take your choice. Like the weather or any act-of-god, bad or poor officiating is part of The Game. Change it with inhuman technology and everybody loses, not just the poor losers who blame their incompetence in playing a losing game on poor officiating.
It shouldn't have even been a catch then.
That back judge was horribly out of position. -
I can't believe anyone would even pretend that was a catch. Fuck
-
There's no pretending in football, especially when it comes to the two stomps we got on the Huskers. It's the smell of times that pretending must be stewed with the truth.
-
Look the Huskies were the better team against that Nebraska team but that clearly wasn't a catch. I remember thinking at the time we got away with one. It was obvious in fast time, slow motion, the ref botched it.
-
Same here. I was 11 years old and I knew at the time he didn't catch it. We've been robbed plenty of times so no apologies, but let's not pretend it was anything but a blown call. Our resident doogs claiming it was a catch would have lost their damn minds if that was a 'Braska receiver with the gift touchdown.He_Needs_More_Time said:Look the Huskies were the better team against that Nebraska team but that clearly wasn't a catch. I remember thinking at the time we got away with one. It was obvious in fast time, slow motion, the ref botched it.
-
In doog fantasy, the rewrite of scoreboard truth must be a never-ending endeavor to account for why so many stuck in the millennial generation will never be part of the legend.
-
huh?Tailgater said:In doog fantasy, the rewrite of scoreboard truth must be a never-ending endeavor to account for why so many stuck in the millennial generation will never be part of the legend.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)