CGTP, DDY, TLDR, a Q????
I know he's supposed to be an ace recruiter so maybe that's aiming too low. Seems likely if Spiker liked Bush he'll like Lubick so we probably can close with him now?
Comments
-
This should make Devin Culp the easiest commit we have had in a while... Culp just ended up having his originally commited coach combined with his favorite program. Money.
-
Excellent poontjhfstyle24 said:This should make Devin Culp the easiest commit we have had in a while... Culp just ended up having his originally commited coach combined with his favorite program. Money.
-
Cota is white too...
-
Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
-
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total. -
I'm wondering if our Ute friend is asking how many 5-star caliber players we feel that are on the roster (as compared to the rankings)CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total. -
This is what I'm looking for @Tequilla. When you guys take the field this fall, you will have 28 guys on the roster who were 4*s.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total.
@Tequilla remember your comment I think two podcasts ago, Clemson had 46 4*s on their roster, making the case that this is what it takes to be a championship caliber team.
I'd be interested in this stat for each Pac-12 team if you have an easy way to figure it out.
Please don't
-
@dnc
I've outlined at a couple of different times a few ideas that while they may diverge a bit from what DDY and Pepsi would say, I think are accurate in terms of recruiting. Specifically, for UW, what it really comes down to doing what they do and doing it well.
For me, Pete has unlocked a secret for UW recruiting that is the gold standard going forward in that by limiting attrition, he's stocking class after class full of good talent because we're able to recruit in that 18 player class fairly easily. That's the sweet spot number for us.
In any given year, there's probably on average about 6-8 high caliber D1 players that come out of the State of Washington. Our goal is to make sure that we're consistently hitting at 75% or above on those players - which we are under Pete. We should be able to get about the same number out of California each year ... a handful out of Orange County and the rest either inland or in the Bay Area where we are helped by the fact that Cal sucks and Stanford recruits nationally creating a void for us to come swooping in on. After that, the rest of our class is a combination of players one here, two there, etc. tied to the fact that we cast a relatively wide net in establishing our connections and relationships and then seeing what sticks. Getting back to doing well in Hawaii should be a priority for us.
As for Lubick, given that he's established plenty of contacts up and down the West Coast with 10 years of experience as an assistant in the PAC, there's a lot to like initially at least. His experience outside of the West Coast being at Duke (which also somewhat recruits nationally) as part of the staff that laid the foundation under Cutcliffe as well as Ole Miss under Ed O leads me to think that he's clearly got some good chops in recruiting. But for me, what it comes down to under Lubick is that his job and make sure that he's not missing what he shouldn't be missing as much as it is getting guys that we shouldn't be getting.
In our signing day pod, DDY and Pepsi talked about how Gregory and Bonerpopper pretty much just get what they are supposed to get. Since the pod, it has gotten me thinking about that. There's no question that you need a couple of high-end achievers on your staff like Lake, what Bush was, and what Lubick appears to be. But outside of that, provided that we have assistants on our staff that simply do what they are supposed to do ... get the guys that are supposed to be coming here ... we'll be fine. It's why the Strausser situation to me is such a head scratcher because for as good of a coach that he clearly is, his recruiting results are so sub par ... imagine what our OL depth would look like if Strausser was just the recruiter that Gregory and Bonerpopper were? -
Your having fantasies about being raped by Steve Poole. Thanks for sharing.89ute said:
This is what I'm looking for @Tequilla. When you guys take the field this fall, you will have 28 guys on the roster who were 4*s.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total.
@Tequilla remember your comment I think two podcasts ago, Clemson had 46 4*s on their roster, making the case that this is what it takes to be a championship caliber team.
I'd be interested in this stat for each Pac-12 team if you have an easy way to figure it out.
Please don't -
I'm sure that it is something that can be put together @89ute ... I'll put it on my to-do list for stats in the offseason.
-
I may have used it incorrectly. I was clued in by someone (not IrishDawg22, even though I tried) that KOMO 4 BUTTFUCKER meant look it up yourself. I later learned on my own that Komo 4 is one of your TV stations, then I later learned that the man in the photo is Steve Poole who is some newsguy or something for Komo 4, so I figured this pic meant look it up yourself.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Your having fantasies about being raped by Steve Poole. Thanks for sharing.89ute said:
This is what I'm looking for @Tequilla. When you guys take the field this fall, you will have 28 guys on the roster who were 4*s.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total.
@Tequilla remember your comment I think two podcasts ago, Clemson had 46 4*s on their roster, making the case that this is what it takes to be a championship caliber team.
I'd be interested in this stat for each Pac-12 team if you have an easy way to figure it out.
Please don't
True? -
Chad Cota's boy?
-
Axxe @Dude6189ute said:
I may have used it incorrectly. I was clued in by someone (not IrishDawg22, even though I tried) that KOMO 4 BUTTFUCKER meant look it up yourself. I later learned on my own that Komo 4 is one of your TV stations, then I later learned that the man in the photo is Steve Poole who is some newsguy or something for Komo 4, so I figured this pic meant look it up yourself.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Your having fantasies about being raped by Steve Poole. Thanks for sharing.89ute said:
This is what I'm looking for @Tequilla. When you guys take the field this fall, you will have 28 guys on the roster who were 4*s.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total.
@Tequilla remember your comment I think two podcasts ago, Clemson had 46 4*s on their roster, making the case that this is what it takes to be a championship caliber team.
I'd be interested in this stat for each Pac-12 team if you have an easy way to figure it out.
Please don't
True? -
I've been here since the beginning of this hive of villainy and still have no idea what Komo 4 Buttfucker means.89ute said:
I may have used it incorrectly. I was clued in by someone (not IrishDawg22, even though I tried) that KOMO 4 BUTTFUCKER meant look it up yourself. I later learned on my own that Komo 4 is one of your TV stations, then I later learned that the man in the photo is Steve Poole who is some newsguy or something for Komo 4, so I figured this pic meant look it up yourself.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Your having fantasies about being raped by Steve Poole. Thanks for sharing.89ute said:
This is what I'm looking for @Tequilla. When you guys take the field this fall, you will have 28 guys on the roster who were 4*s.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total.
@Tequilla remember your comment I think two podcasts ago, Clemson had 46 4*s on their roster, making the case that this is what it takes to be a championship caliber team.
I'd be interested in this stat for each Pac-12 team if you have an easy way to figure it out.
Please don't
True? -
It means I'm not posting a link so go look it up yourself
-
Ok but I still have no idea what the reference to Steve Poole isSwaye said:It means I'm not posting a link so go look it up yourself
-
Cant have a link when I was watching live and in passing buttfucker. Go to komo4.com duck, find the link in TOP STORIES and find the bitch yourself. Want me to hold your fucking hand the rest of your life? Break free AZ, there's a wealth of knowledge right at your fingertips.Meek said:
Ok but I still have no idea what the reference to Steve Poole isSwaye said:It means I'm not posting a link so go look it up yourself
-
@89ute the actual total for clemson is just guys that they signed, we did not account for attrition of those four and five star players in that case.
For pac12 teams I can easily provide you detail on every team in the conference for how many active four and five star players they recruited and currently have on roster; however, I am in the middle of nowhere right now and don't have the data sheets I use to keep track of that shit. -
Thank you. I was kind of hoping one of you had something like that. The amount of brain damage involved if someone like me were to try to do this by pecking through rosters and signing classes on scout/rivals.com and trying to compile it on my yellow pad is just plain fucked up. My spreadsheet abilities are less than limited. That's what lead the the whole Steve Poole thing, I thought for sure someone was going to tell me to "look it up yourself buttfucker.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:@89ute the actual total for clemson is just guys that they signed, we did not account for attrition of those four and five star players in that case.
For pac12 teams I can easily provide you detail on every team in the conference for how many active four and five star players they recruited and currently have on roster; however, I am in the middle of nowhere right now and don't have the data sheets I use to keep track of that shit. -
If @MrsPetersen is bored perhaps this info could be found.89ute said:
Thank you. I was kind of hoping one of you had something like that. The amount of brain damage involved if someone like me were to try to do this by pecking through rosters and signing classes on scout/rivals.com and trying to compile it on my yellow pad is just plain fucked up. My spreadsheet abilities are less than limited. That's what lead the the whole Steve Poole thing, I thought for sure someone was going to tell me to "look it up yourself buttfucker.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:@89ute the actual total for clemson is just guys that they signed, we did not account for attrition of those four and five star players in that case.
For pac12 teams I can easily provide you detail on every team in the conference for how many active four and five star players they recruited and currently have on roster; however, I am in the middle of nowhere right now and don't have the data sheets I use to keep track of that shit. -
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClemsonTigers/comments/5t1ck1/clemson_footballs_talent_level_over_the_last/89ute said:
Thank you. I was kind of hoping one of you had something like that. The amount of brain damage involved if someone like me were to try to do this by pecking through rosters and signing classes on scout/rivals.com and trying to compile it on my yellow pad is just plain fucked up. My spreadsheet abilities are less than limited. That's what lead the the whole Steve Poole thing, I thought for sure someone was going to tell me to "look it up yourself buttfucker.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:@89ute the actual total for clemson is just guys that they signed, we did not account for attrition of those four and five star players in that case.
For pac12 teams I can easily provide you detail on every team in the conference for how many active four and five star players they recruited and currently have on roster; however, I am in the middle of nowhere right now and don't have the data sheets I use to keep track of that shit. -
Ma!!! The fucking spread sheet with 4/5 star players by PAC School!!! We want it -now!! Gosh - what are doing in there?CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:@89ute the actual total for clemson is just guys that they signed, we did not account for attrition of those four and five star players in that case.
For pac12 teams I can easily provide you detail on every team in the conference for how many active four and five star players they recruited and currently have on roster; however, I am in the middle of nowhere right now and don't have the data sheets I use to keep track of that shit. -
Good chit.Dennis_DeYoung said:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClemsonTigers/comments/5t1ck1/clemson_footballs_talent_level_over_the_last/89ute said:
Thank you. I was kind of hoping one of you had something like that. The amount of brain damage involved if someone like me were to try to do this by pecking through rosters and signing classes on scout/rivals.com and trying to compile it on my yellow pad is just plain fucked up. My spreadsheet abilities are less than limited. That's what lead the the whole Steve Poole thing, I thought for sure someone was going to tell me to "look it up yourself buttfucker.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:@89ute the actual total for clemson is just guys that they signed, we did not account for attrition of those four and five star players in that case.
For pac12 teams I can easily provide you detail on every team in the conference for how many active four and five star players they recruited and currently have on roster; however, I am in the middle of nowhere right now and don't have the data sheets I use to keep track of that shit. -
This really was one of @Dude61 best contributions.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Axxe @Dude6189ute said:
I may have used it incorrectly. I was clued in by someone (not IrishDawg22, even though I tried) that KOMO 4 BUTTFUCKER meant look it up yourself. I later learned on my own that Komo 4 is one of your TV stations, then I later learned that the man in the photo is Steve Poole who is some newsguy or something for Komo 4, so I figured this pic meant look it up yourself.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Your having fantasies about being raped by Steve Poole. Thanks for sharing.89ute said:
This is what I'm looking for @Tequilla. When you guys take the field this fall, you will have 28 guys on the roster who were 4*s.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total.
@Tequilla remember your comment I think two podcasts ago, Clemson had 46 4*s on their roster, making the case that this is what it takes to be a championship caliber team.
I'd be interested in this stat for each Pac-12 team if you have an easy way to figure it out.
Please don't
True? -
As much room as we have for improvement in recruiting - i.e., no more BC in state OL guys are allowed to leave again EVER - the dramatic uptick in "rostered BC's" for our Program is a big positive. I was counting 29 (per Scout) but I'd trust @CokeGreaterThanPepsi figure of 28 over mine. And 19 of the 29 are from 2016 and 17, so we are making solid progress, to say the least, to getting to that 40 number Climpson had last season.Dennis_DeYoung said:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ClemsonTigers/comments/5t1ck1/clemson_footballs_talent_level_over_the_last/89ute said:
Thank you. I was kind of hoping one of you had something like that. The amount of brain damage involved if someone like me were to try to do this by pecking through rosters and signing classes on scout/rivals.com and trying to compile it on my yellow pad is just plain fucked up. My spreadsheet abilities are less than limited. That's what lead the the whole Steve Poole thing, I thought for sure someone was going to tell me to "look it up yourself buttfucker.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:@89ute the actual total for clemson is just guys that they signed, we did not account for attrition of those four and five star players in that case.
For pac12 teams I can easily provide you detail on every team in the conference for how many active four and five star players they recruited and currently have on roster; however, I am in the middle of nowhere right now and don't have the data sheets I use to keep track of that shit. -
Ok here is the whole Pac recruiting breakdown by stars. This is players that are actively on the roster. If they left, I filtered them out.
Cc: @CokeGreaterThanPepsi , @89ute
-
What jumps out at me is Cal has the 3rd most players in the NFL (34) next to Oregon (35) and USC (43)
I've known this for a long time about Cal but I thought it was because they had a shitload of talent but could never do anything with it. Looking at this list of raw talent it would appear that Cal is developing talent. Conclusion, Cal has incredible coaching, but can't win. That makes no sense.
Look at UCLA, tons of talent, relatively few NFL players (29). Easily chalk this up to shitting coaching, easy to understand.
Cal is an enigma. What the fuck?
This is where I counted up the NFL players.
http://www.espn.com/nfl/college
Thank you for your work @MrsPetersen, I appreciate it. -
I can filter my data by year, but I am too lazy to turn on my laptop again... I suspect the NFL influx of talent was during the Tosh/Tedford glory years and now they are shit. I'll look tomorrow and report back.
-
Without looking I believe Cal's number of NFL players has been falling steadily since Tedford left.89ute said:What jumps out at me is Cal has the 3rd most players in the NFL (34) next to Oregon (35) and USC (43)
I've known this for a long time about Cal but I thought it was because they had a shitload of talent but could never do anything with it. Looking at this list of raw talent it would appear that Cal is developing talent. Conclusion, Cal has incredible coaching, but can't win. That makes no sense.
Look at UCLA, tons of talent, relatively few NFL players (29). Easily chalk this up to shitting coaching, easy to understand.
Cal is an enigma. What the fuck?
This is where I counted up the NFL players.
http://www.espn.com/nfl/college
Thank you for your work @MrsPetersen, I appreciate it. -
One of these days I know I'm going find myself alone in an elevator with Steve Pool and have to explain this.89ute said:
This is what I'm looking for @Tequilla. When you guys take the field this fall, you will have 28 guys on the roster who were 4*s.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total.
@Tequilla remember your comment I think two podcasts ago, Clemson had 46 4*s on their roster, making the case that this is what it takes to be a championship caliber team.
I'd be interested in this stat for each Pac-12 team if you have an easy way to figure it out.
Please don't
