Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
CGTP, DDY, TLDR, a Q????
Comments
-
Or would you rather explain Sloppy Tits to your AD?DerekJohnson said:
One of these days I know I'm going find myself alone in an elevator with Steve Pool and have to explain this.89ute said:
This is what I'm looking for @Tequilla. When you guys take the field this fall, you will have 28 guys on the roster who were 4*s.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total.
@Tequilla remember your comment I think two podcasts ago, Clemson had 46 4*s on their roster, making the case that this is what it takes to be a championship caliber team.
I'd be interested in this stat for each Pac-12 team if you have an easy way to figure it out.
Please don't
-
That would be easier to explain than the Steve Pool meme, which makes little sense even when fully explained.89ute said:
Or would you rather explain Sloppy Tits to your AD?DerekJohnson said:
One of these days I know I'm going find myself alone in an elevator with Steve Pool and have to explain this.89ute said:
This is what I'm looking for @Tequilla. When you guys take the field this fall, you will have 28 guys on the roster who were 4*s.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total.
@Tequilla remember your comment I think two podcasts ago, Clemson had 46 4*s on their roster, making the case that this is what it takes to be a championship caliber team.
I'd be interested in this stat for each Pac-12 team if you have an easy way to figure it out.
Please don't -
Yeah, I'm still a little confused. Does it mean - I can't provide a link because I watched it live or - look it up yourself, or both?DerekJohnson said:
That would be easier to explain than the Steve Pool meme, which makes little sense even when fully explained.89ute said:
Or would you rather explain Sloppy Tits to your AD?DerekJohnson said:
One of these days I know I'm going find myself alone in an elevator with Steve Pool and have to explain this.89ute said:
This is what I'm looking for @Tequilla. When you guys take the field this fall, you will have 28 guys on the roster who were 4*s.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total.
@Tequilla remember your comment I think two podcasts ago, Clemson had 46 4*s on their roster, making the case that this is what it takes to be a championship caliber team.
I'd be interested in this stat for each Pac-12 team if you have an easy way to figure it out.
Please don't -
yes89ute said:
Yeah, I'm still a little confused. Does it mean - I can't provide a link because I watched it live or - look it up yourself, or both?DerekJohnson said:
That would be easier to explain than the Steve Pool meme, which makes little sense even when fully explained.89ute said:
Or would you rather explain Sloppy Tits to your AD?DerekJohnson said:
One of these days I know I'm going find myself alone in an elevator with Steve Pool and have to explain this.89ute said:
This is what I'm looking for @Tequilla. When you guys take the field this fall, you will have 28 guys on the roster who were 4*s.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
There are no 5 stars on the roster.89ute said:Another question for the fine gentlemen of TSIO. Now that NSD is over, how many 4 and 5 stars are there on your roster?
When the 2017 class arrives on campus we will have 28 active four stars. And from 2013-2017 we signed 38 in total.
@Tequilla remember your comment I think two podcasts ago, Clemson had 46 4*s on their roster, making the case that this is what it takes to be a championship caliber team.
I'd be interested in this stat for each Pac-12 team if you have an easy way to figure it out.
Please don't -
@89ute The furthest I could go back for Cal was the 2010 class (not the prime of the Tedford years...), but that was the first year we started tracking this data for the rest of the conference. Cal's breakdown from 2010-2012 (Dykes took over in 2013) was:
0/1 star: 2
2 star: 4
3 star: 31
4 star: 16
5 star: 3 -
One last set... this is for all Pac12 schools between 2013-2017 classes. This includes all players (except for transfers)... not just active.
-
That flicked the head of my doogboner, thanks.MrsPetersen said:One last set... this is for all Pac12 schools between 2013-2017 classes. This includes all players (except for transfers)... not just active.
-
When I see this it makes me realize we still have a lot of room for improvement. It also really pounds home the point that UCLA sucks enormous donkey nuts. They are just a cunt hair behind USC. It's sort of unreal how you can fuck up that much talent. It's like Mora is trying to suck.MrsPetersen said:Ok here is the whole Pac recruiting breakdown by stars. This is players that are actively on the roster. If they left, I filtered them out.
Cc: @CokeGreaterThanPepsi , @89ute
Also, we are right in the mix with Oregon and Stanford on a clear second tier. The trick will be getting in between tiers where we pull away from Tree and Oregon, and get within striking distance of USC/UCLA (not going to catch them ever).
-
UCLA is the biggest fraud ever and their only Heisman winner won because of racism. True Story. @BallSackedSwaye said:
When I see this it makes me realize we still have a lot of room for improvement. It also really pounds home the point that UCLA sucks enormous donkey nuts. They are just a cunt hair behind USC. It's sort of unreal how you can fuck up that much talent. It's like Mora is trying to suck.MrsPetersen said:Ok here is the whole Pac recruiting breakdown by stars. This is players that are actively on the roster. If they left, I filtered them out.
Cc: @CokeGreaterThanPepsi , @89ute
Also, we are right in the mix with Oregon and Stanford on a clear second tier. The trick will be getting in between tiers where we pull away from Tree and Oregon, and get within striking distance of USC/UCLA (not going to catch them ever). -
Seriously. That is Climpson level recruiting there, and only eclipsed by Michigan, Ohio State, Bama and USC (barely). UCLA has absolutely no excuse for not being in the PAC12 conversation every year. Except their coaching sucks. Ass.Dennis_DeYoung said:
UCLA is the biggest fraud ever and their only Heisman winner won because of racism. True Story. @BallSackedSwaye said:
When I see this it makes me realize we still have a lot of room for improvement. It also really pounds home the point that UCLA sucks enormous donkey nuts. They are just a cunt hair behind USC. It's sort of unreal how you can fuck up that much talent. It's like Mora is trying to suck.MrsPetersen said:Ok here is the whole Pac recruiting breakdown by stars. This is players that are actively on the roster. If they left, I filtered them out.
Cc: @CokeGreaterThanPepsi , @89ute
Also, we are right in the mix with Oregon and Stanford on a clear second tier. The trick will be getting in between tiers where we pull away from Tree and Oregon, and get within striking distance of USC/UCLA (not going to catch them ever).
