Another big surprise...more made up "Global Warming" data...
Comments
-
I'm the moron. But you throw out a chart ignoring the last 40 years. Also like 4 posts ago you said recorded history was only "like 30 or 40 years".HoustonHusky said:
WTF are you talking about? The chart doesn't stop at 1960...it stops in the late 1970s. God you are a moron.2001400ex said:
Why does you chart stop in 1960? You see, your chart illustrates exactly what my gif is getting at.HoustonHusky said:Thanks for illustrating my point...these folks put out charts that look official but the data behind them is crap and has been "adjusted" numerous times to fit the narrative they want. The US data is sparce, and global data is pretty much nonexistent going back in history.
As an example, somehow the historical data changed significantly from the 80s to today. Here was the official North American historical chart from the late 70s/early 80s...which included the global heat waves of the 1930s that everyone knows about (dust bowl/etc).
The only way that chart changes that much to the current one is through data "adjustments"...and it's amazing how the adjustments magically fit the narrative they want...
BTW, the dust bowl is weather, not climate. The plains of the United States is not indicative of the world.
And even if you accept your chart...all it says is that we are almost back up to the temps of the 30s. Well, until you change the historical data...
Not to mention that global warming is being linked to CO2 emissions. What do you think happened the last 40 years globally with CO2 emissions? -
Whose chart is it? Who provides their funding? What is the political agenda of those funding it? What policy(ies) is/are being influenced by the sponsored results?
-
Exactly. You are on the side of politicians, conservative pundits, and oil execs.doogie said:Whose chart is it? Who provides their funding? What is the political agenda of those funding it? What policy(ies) is/are being influenced by the sponsored results?
-
I'm on any/every side that is against you.
-
Thank you for not getting the point...big surprise. You can't say CO2 causes global warming and have the temps in the 30s the same as the temps today, so you have to "adjust" the historical temps down as they have. And you can't have a pause in global warming over the last 19 years or so when the CO2 levels have gone up as much or more than the previous years when temps did rise, so you have to find ways to adjust the data to force the temps to rise as they apparently did.2001400ex said:
I'm the moron. But you throw out a chart ignoring the last 40 years. Also like 4 posts ago you said recorded history was only "like 30 or 40 years".HoustonHusky said:
WTF are you talking about? The chart doesn't stop at 1960...it stops in the late 1970s. God you are a moron.2001400ex said:
Why does you chart stop in 1960? You see, your chart illustrates exactly what my gif is getting at.HoustonHusky said:Thanks for illustrating my point...these folks put out charts that look official but the data behind them is crap and has been "adjusted" numerous times to fit the narrative they want. The US data is sparce, and global data is pretty much nonexistent going back in history.
As an example, somehow the historical data changed significantly from the 80s to today. Here was the official North American historical chart from the late 70s/early 80s...which included the global heat waves of the 1930s that everyone knows about (dust bowl/etc).
The only way that chart changes that much to the current one is through data "adjustments"...and it's amazing how the adjustments magically fit the narrative they want...
BTW, the dust bowl is weather, not climate. The plains of the United States is not indicative of the world.
And even if you accept your chart...all it says is that we are almost back up to the temps of the 30s. Well, until you change the historical data...
Not to mention that global warming is being linked to CO2 emissions. What do you think happened the last 40 years globally with CO2 emissions?
-
-
-
-
-
