Another big surprise...more made up "Global Warming" data...
The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.
...
Both datasets were flawed. This newspaper has learnt that NOAA has now decided that the sea dataset will have to be replaced and substantially revised just 18 months after it was issued, because it used unreliable methods which overstated the speed of warming. The revised data will show both lower temperatures and a slower rate in the recent warming trend.
The land temperature dataset used by the study was afflicted by devastating bugs in its software that rendered its findings ‘unstable’.
...
Dr Bates said: ‘They had good data from buoys. And they threw it out and “corrected” it by using the bad data from ships. You never change good data to agree with bad, but that’s what they did – so as to make it look as if the sea was warmer.’
ERSSTv4 ‘adjusted’ buoy readings up by 0.12C. It also ignored data from satellites that measure the temperature of the lower atmosphere, which are also considered reliable. Dr Bates said he gave the paper’s co-authors ‘a hard time’ about this, ‘and they never really justified what they were doing.’
etc..etc..
The sad part is that I'm sure the raw data sets themselves (both in this and other sets) have been compromised beyond validity, which means they pretty much are completely worthless for actual science.
Comments
-
Here comes one of our liberal lap dogs who will post some shitty graph/chart no one gives a flying fuck about.
-
Figures lie and liars figure.
It figures.
-
So let's get rid of the EPA and coal plants can dump in rivers again. I enjoy acid rain.
-
Is evolution fake too trump?
-
Either way, you knowPurpleThrobber said:Figures lie and liars figure.
It figures. -
Yall need to graduate from Breitbart and British tabloids.
-
In other global warning news: the newest glacier in the world is in the crater of Mt. St. Helen's, and today it snowed in the United Arab Emirates.
-
Give them a few months and they'll use them anyway.HoustonHusky said:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4192182/World-leaders-duped-manipulated-global-warming-data.html
The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.
...
Both datasets were flawed. This newspaper has learnt that NOAA has now decided that the sea dataset will have to be replaced and substantially revised just 18 months after it was issued, because it used unreliable methods which overstated the speed of warming. The revised data will show both lower temperatures and a slower rate in the recent warming trend.
The land temperature dataset used by the study was afflicted by devastating bugs in its software that rendered its findings ‘unstable’.
...
Dr Bates said: ‘They had good data from buoys. And they threw it out and “corrected” it by using the bad data from ships. You never change good data to agree with bad, but that’s what they did – so as to make it look as if the sea was warmer.’
ERSSTv4 ‘adjusted’ buoy readings up by 0.12C. It also ignored data from satellites that measure the temperature of the lower atmosphere, which are also considered reliable. Dr Bates said he gave the paper’s co-authors ‘a hard time’ about this, ‘and they never really justified what they were doing.’
etc..etc..
The sad part is that I'm sure the raw data sets themselves (both in this and other sets) have been compromised beyond validity, which means they pretty much are completely worthless for actual science. -
To be fair, while the mail on Sunday is technically a tabloid (it is published in tabloid format, not on broadsheet), its editorial staff is not the same as the daily mail, they are separate papers.WilburHooksHands said:Yall need to graduate from Breitbart and British tabloids.
-
Yeah, I hear the Scientific Method is a Liberal Elite construct.CuntWaffle said:Here comes one of our liberal lap dogs who will post some shitty graph/chart no one gives a flying fuck about.
Gravity Always Wins..even if you don't give a flying fuck.
