Nothing on Gorsuch?
Comments
-
TurdBuffer said:
He'sGarland is a shoe-in. They can't Bork him, because he's squeaky clean. But they'll try, and wind up looking like assholes, mostly because they are, but also because he's smarter and more accomplished than any of them, despite hisrightwardCenter Left leanings. -
Stolen seat
OK
I guess you have to come up with something -
I think I'll add that McConnel is a spineless jelly fish (redundant) who has never taken a stand in his life leading in a large way to Trump running against the GOP establishment.
The fact that the GOP didn't cave on Garland is almost a miracle and it shows just how shitty a politician Obama was. When Obama came in he got what he wanted. By the time he left he had got republicans elected all over the country and got the spineless GOP to stand against him
You can't steal something that belongs to the people. The Supreme Court isn't owned by Obama or the democrats.
If you like Gorusch just say so and stop being such a fucking drama queen every day. -
Triple post
Hi!
Not yet! -
dhdawg said:
perfectly acceptable pick to replace kennedy, or Ginsburg. Much better than I even expected. and very much unlike someone you'd expect trump to pick. We do need to hear his opinion of the NSA on the record
Nothing will change the fact that this seat was stolen.
You're referring to the Clintons killing Scallia on his hunting trip, right?
-
Then, why all the ranting?dhdawg said:I actually like the idea of an 8 person SC. if the decision is clear, you'll get 5 people to vote for it anyway. Otherwise send it back to the appeals court
-
Mighty snowy for February!dhdawg said:the dems in there infinite stupidity will make it about issues and filibuster.
If they are going to do that. don't even bring up a single issue. just say the seat was stolen (which it was), bring up what cruz and mccain said before the election, and make McConnell answer the questions if he wants to nuke.
They won't because they suck. but that's how they should handle it. -
Garland anti 2A, he has zero understanding of the constitution. Probably juty as bad as the "wise home girl".,dhdawg said:TurdBuffer said:He'sGarland is a shoe-in. They can't Bork him, because he's squeaky clean. But they'll try, and wind up looking like assholes, mostly because they are, but also because he's smarter and more accomplished than any of them, despite hisrightwardCenter Left leanings. -
This is like a mole squeaking that the hawk doesn't know shit about eyesightSledog said:
Garland anti 2A, he has zero understanding of the constitution.dhdawg said:TurdBuffer said:He'sGarland is a shoe-in. They can't Bork him, because he's squeaky clean. But they'll try, and wind up looking like assholes, mostly because they are, but also because he's smarter and more accomplished than any of them, despite hisrightwardCenter Left leanings. -
I agree with most of your post except this.RaceBannon said:I think I'll add that McConnel is a spineless jelly fish (redundant) who has never taken a stand in his life leading in a large way to Trump running against the GOP establishment.
The fact that the GOP didn't cave on Garland is almost a miracle and it shows just how shitty a politician Obama was. When Obama came in he got what he wanted. By the time he left he had got republicans elected all over the country and got the spineless GOP to stand against him
You can't steal something that belongs to the people. The Supreme Court isn't owned by Obama or the democrats.
If you like Gorusch just say so and stop being such a fucking drama queen every day.
He let the shitty blue dogs repub... erm, democrats run his first term. cost him the house.





