I actually like the idea of an 8 person SC. if the decision is clear, you'll get 5 people to vote for it anyway. Otherwise send it back to the appeals court
I actually like the idea of an 8 person SC. if the decision is clear, you'll get 5 people to vote for it anyway. Otherwise send it back to the appeals court
It's actually crazy the number of votes that are unanimous. The ones that are lame are like the Obamacare vote where 4 didn't read it and said no. 4 others didn't read it and says yes. And left it to the 9th person to justify his thoughts.
the dems in there infinite stupidity will make it about issues and filibuster. If they are going to do that. don't even bring up a single issue. just say the seat was stolen (which it was), bring up what cruz and mccain said before the election, and make McConnell answer the questions if he wants to nuke.
They won't because they suck. but that's how they should handle it.
He's a shoe-in. They can't Bork him, because he's squeaky clean. But they'll try, and wind up looking like assholes, mostly because they are, but also because he's smarter and more accomplished than any of them, despite his rightward leanings.
perfectly acceptable pick to replace kennedy, or Ginsburg. Much better than I even expected. and very much unlike someone you'd expect trump to pick. We do need to hear his opinion of the NSA on the record
Nothing will change the fact that this seat was stolen.
Pelosi drew a hard line in the sand on him during her CNN Town Hall this evening, which was an understandable play but one I think that will come back to bite her if she pushes it. Pick your battles; this isn't a winnable one.
I get it. but it's still a stolen seat. there can't just be no political price
I don't disagree. But extract the pound of flesh elsewhere, not here. Fighting the battle over this particular appointment won't go well for Democrats. Better to hit hard somewhere else where they're weaker and the Dems are stronger. Kinda like Weinberger's policy of horizontal escalation in the early 1980's regarding the Sovs.
Both parties can DIAFF. And you too, commie fucker.
I actually like the idea of an 8 person SC. if the decision is clear, you'll get 5 people to vote for it anyway. Otherwise send it back to the appeals court
Agree. It needs to be composed of 4 fucktarded extreme right zealots and 4 fucktarded extreme left zealots, perpetual gridlock on important social issues, send the power back to the people where it belongs. It doesn't belong in the hands of these fucktwits.
He's Garland is a shoe-in. They can't Bork him, because he's squeaky clean. But they'll try, and wind up looking like assholes, mostly because they are, but also because he's smarter and more accomplished than any of them, despite his rightward Center Left leanings.
I think I'll add that McConnel is a spineless jelly fish (redundant) who has never taken a stand in his life leading in a large way to Trump running against the GOP establishment.
The fact that the GOP didn't cave on Garland is almost a miracle and it shows just how shitty a politician Obama was. When Obama came in he got what he wanted. By the time he left he had got republicans elected all over the country and got the spineless GOP to stand against him
You can't steal something that belongs to the people. The Supreme Court isn't owned by Obama or the democrats.
If you like Gorusch just say so and stop being such a fucking drama queen every day.
perfectly acceptable pick to replace kennedy, or Ginsburg. Much better than I even expected. and very much unlike someone you'd expect trump to pick. We do need to hear his opinion of the NSA on the record
Nothing will change the fact that this seat was stolen.
You're referring to the Clintons killing Scallia on his hunting trip, right?
I actually like the idea of an 8 person SC. if the decision is clear, you'll get 5 people to vote for it anyway. Otherwise send it back to the appeals court
the dems in there infinite stupidity will make it about issues and filibuster. If they are going to do that. don't even bring up a single issue. just say the seat was stolen (which it was), bring up what cruz and mccain said before the election, and make McConnell answer the questions if he wants to nuke.
They won't because they suck. but that's how they should handle it.
He's Garland is a shoe-in. They can't Bork him, because he's squeaky clean. But they'll try, and wind up looking like assholes, mostly because they are, but also because he's smarter and more accomplished than any of them, despite his rightward Center Left leanings.
Garland anti 2A, he has zero understanding of the constitution. Probably juty as bad as the "wise home girl".,
He's Garland is a shoe-in. They can't Bork him, because he's squeaky clean. But they'll try, and wind up looking like assholes, mostly because they are, but also because he's smarter and more accomplished than any of them, despite his rightward Center Left leanings.
Garland anti 2A, he has zero understanding of the constitution.
This is like a mole squeaking that the hawk doesn't know shit about eyesight
I think I'll add that McConnel is a spineless jelly fish (redundant) who has never taken a stand in his life leading in a large way to Trump running against the GOP establishment.
The fact that the GOP didn't cave on Garland is almost a miracle and it shows just how shitty a politician Obama was. When Obama came in he got what he wanted. By the time he left he had got republicans elected all over the country and got the spineless GOP to stand against him
You can't steal something that belongs to the people. The Supreme Court isn't owned by Obama or the democrats.
If you like Gorusch just say so and stop being such a fucking drama queen every day.
I agree with most of your post except this. He let the shitty blue dogs repub... erm, democrats run his first term. cost him the house.
Comments
If they are going to do that. don't even bring up a single issue. just say the seat was stolen (which it was), bring up what cruz and mccain said before the election, and make McConnell answer the questions if he wants to nuke.
They won't because they suck. but that's how they should handle it.
OK
I guess you have to come up with something
The fact that the GOP didn't cave on Garland is almost a miracle and it shows just how shitty a politician Obama was. When Obama came in he got what he wanted. By the time he left he had got republicans elected all over the country and got the spineless GOP to stand against him
You can't steal something that belongs to the people. The Supreme Court isn't owned by Obama or the democrats.
If you like Gorusch just say so and stop being such a fucking drama queen every day.
Hi!
Not yet!
You're referring to the Clintons killing Scallia on his hunting trip, right?
He let the shitty blue dogs repub... erm, democrats run his first term. cost him the house.