Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Question about our OL this year, when many said it was the best in the Pac 12
Even if our OL wasn't the best in the Pac 12, it was better than Stanford'd when we played them. How is it the case that our OL was better than their's? Haven't they beat us in OL recruiting every year for the past 10 years?
So, if their recruiting was better than ours, was our player development and coaching better? Was their some other factor?
-2 ·
Comments
He's missed on a couple of guys (Sarrell and Michael E. who strangely decided to go get plungered often with Dick Rod). It's still worth pointing out that Strausser has nabbed at least one 4 star OL in each of his 4 classes.
I'm thinking once Strausser gets UW guys in the NFL (Adams, probably McGary, and a few others), it should get easier for him to get the elite guys.
Just in this class, the bigger miss isn't Fozzy but AVT ... how he lost him is a fucking mystery.
Not saying he's killed it but it's hasn't been horrendous.
What is the story on AVT? I thought he was USC or ASU all the way.
https://n.rivals.com/content/prospects/5988
Is he going to work full time at Cascadia Capital? (@CokeGreaterThanPepsi any idea what Jake got lined up for full time?)
2) The most comparable position group to the OL recruiting was WR recruiting under Pease ... look at the difference in results from Pease to Hamden
3) AVT had tripped up here a number of times and was considered a UW lean at minimum ... then he took a visit to USC and committed more or less on the spot ... why would that have happened?