Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

2017 Roster Update

1235712

Comments

  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 3,022
    Kirkland is serviceable against everyone except SC and Bama. Burelson im still willing to LIPO. All said, a 270 true frosh beat them all out.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,386 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2017
    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    The fuck are we doing at OL?

    The numbers workout fine as long as we get 5 next class with 1 or 2 being JUCO.
    Are you fucking retarded?
    Relax go look at the roster breakdown for other teams 14-16 OL is the norm.
    We are going to have fucking 14 next year and half of them have already been passed by younger players.
    If we were an SEC team we would make those older players transfer and we would be taking 4 guys in this class instead of just 2 but thats not and never will be how Pete operates. Like I said 4 or 5 next year(2 being JUCOs) and we're in a GREAT place.
    Counting on JUCO's? Was your old handle JCKevin?
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    The fuck are we doing at OL?

    The numbers workout fine as long as we get 5 next class with 1 or 2 being JUCO.
    Are you fucking retarded?
    Relax go look at the roster breakdown for other teams 14-16 OL is the norm.
    We are going to have fucking 14 next year and half of them have already been passed by younger players.
    If we were an SEC team we would make those older players transfer and we would be taking 4 guys in this class instead of just 2 but thats not and never will be how Pete operates. Like I said 4 or 5 next year(2 being JUCOs) and we're in a GREAT place.
    We cant sign three OL in a single year that we actually want how are we gonna get 5?

    And JUCO? Holy hell Miguel, who was the last JUCO contributor at UW at any position? How many JUCO OL recruits in the entire country could even be options in any given year?
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Not giving up on devin burleson, rare human being. Same with Henry Roberts and Twattenberg when he isn't sick. Those are all 6'5+ guys that move well.

    And yeah, no reason to run Zeke Turner, his special teams contribution alone is worth it.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,400 Founders Club
    Tequilla said:

    The problem w the OL recruiting is that it is the hardest to unbury yourself from

    The hardest part is that there just isn't the surplus of awesome prospects like there is at the skill positions.

    You actually have to beat other schools at it.
  • KobeStan
    KobeStan Member Posts: 91

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    KobeStan said:

    The fuck are we doing at OL?

    The numbers workout fine as long as we get 5 next class with 1 or 2 being JUCO.
    Are you fucking retarded?
    Relax go look at the roster breakdown for other teams 14-16 OL is the norm.
    We are going to have fucking 14 next year and half of them have already been passed by younger players.
    If we were an SEC team we would make those older players transfer and we would be taking 4 guys in this class instead of just 2 but thats not and never will be how Pete operates. Like I said 4 or 5 next year(2 being JUCOs) and we're in a GREAT place.
    We cant sign three OL in a single year that we actually want how are we gonna get 5?

    And JUCO? Holy hell Miguel, who was the last JUCO contributor at UW at any position? How many JUCO OL recruits in the entire country could even be options in any given year?
    Every single year there are a handful of JUCO OL starting the Pac12, Alabama uses JUCO OL, Oklahoma does as well. The last 2 years there have been JUCO OL on the all conference 1st team(Bolles from Utah and Dahl from WSU)