If you have to resort to

MikeDamone · October 2013

Passion and I need to see a championship.

CaptainPJ · October 2013

MikeDamone said:
Passion and I need to see a championship.

Of course, as validation of other team's coaches. When it comes to Try or Sark, however. . .

Doogie doogie doog!!

Passion · October 2013

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

show previous quotes
Passion said:

RaceBannon said:
claiming in Mora has been at UCLA 6 years in order to compare him to Sark you might be a flaming doog.

If you claim I have ever said Rick is anything other than better than Sark, which he is, you've reached IMALOSER territory in your life.

And if you compare Mora's season and a half to Pinkle's lengthy career you have a bitter and political agenda.

Anyone that knows football sees what is being built in Westwood. Whether Mora is the guy to finish it will be revealed in season three as always. There is nothing left to reveal in year six for Sark.

Seems like Husky fans would care about that.
Rick sucked. He sucked in colorado. He sucked at UW. He sucked at ucla.

I don't know if he's better or worse than Sark. I don't rate coaches that suck. They just suck...although ty reached an elevated status of suckiness.
Winning a Rose Bowl and popping off does not suck.

Hope this helps.

Sorry, that was Lambright's team. Besides, what happened afterward? The same mediocrity we have now.

RaceBannon · October 2013

Passion said:

show previous quotes
TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Passion said:

RaceBannon said:
claiming in Mora has been at UCLA 6 years in order to compare him to Sark you might be a flaming doog.

If you claim I have ever said Rick is anything other than better than Sark, which he is, you've reached IMALOSER territory in your life.

And if you compare Mora's season and a half to Pinkle's lengthy career you have a bitter and political agenda.

Anyone that knows football sees what is being built in Westwood. Whether Mora is the guy to finish it will be revealed in season three as always. There is nothing left to reveal in year six for Sark.

Seems like Husky fans would care about that.
Rick sucked. He sucked in colorado. He sucked at UW. He sucked at ucla.

I don't know if he's better or worse than Sark. I don't rate coaches that suck. They just suck...although ty reached an elevated status of suckiness.
Winning a Rose Bowl and popping off does not suck.

Hope this helps.
Sorry, that was Lambright's team. Besides, what happened afterward? The same mediocrity we have now.

No it was Ricks team. And you still don't get it

DerekJohnson · October 2013

Passion said:

show previous quotes
TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Passion said:

RaceBannon said:
claiming in Mora has been at UCLA 6 years in order to compare him to Sark you might be a flaming doog.

If you claim I have ever said Rick is anything other than better than Sark, which he is, you've reached IMALOSER territory in your life.

And if you compare Mora's season and a half to Pinkle's lengthy career you have a bitter and political agenda.

Anyone that knows football sees what is being built in Westwood. Whether Mora is the guy to finish it will be revealed in season three as always. There is nothing left to reveal in year six for Sark.

Seems like Husky fans would care about that.
Rick sucked. He sucked in colorado. He sucked at UW. He sucked at ucla.

I don't know if he's better or worse than Sark. I don't rate coaches that suck. They just suck...although ty reached an elevated status of suckiness.
Winning a Rose Bowl and popping off does not suck.

Hope this helps.
Sorry, that was Lambright's team. Besides, what happened afterward? The same mediocrity we have now.

I interviewed over 30 players from the Rose Bowl team, and virtually all of the Lambo holdovers said that they felt beaten down by Lambo's last season, and would not have gotten to the Rose Bowl without Rick. Larry Tripplett said it was a perfect combo of Lambo toughness and free-wheelin' Rick (I'm paraphrasing).

MikeDamone · October 2013

Passion said:

show previous quotes
TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Passion said:

RaceBannon said:
claiming in Mora has been at UCLA 6 years in order to compare him to Sark you might be a flaming doog.

If you claim I have ever said Rick is anything other than better than Sark, which he is, you've reached IMALOSER territory in your life.

And if you compare Mora's season and a half to Pinkle's lengthy career you have a bitter and political agenda.

Anyone that knows football sees what is being built in Westwood. Whether Mora is the guy to finish it will be revealed in season three as always. There is nothing left to reveal in year six for Sark.

Seems like Husky fans would care about that.
Rick sucked. He sucked in colorado. He sucked at UW. He sucked at ucla.

I don't know if he's better or worse than Sark. I don't rate coaches that suck. They just suck...although ty reached an elevated status of suckiness.
Winning a Rose Bowl and popping off does not suck.

Hope this helps.
Sorry, that was Lambright's team. Besides, what happened afterward? The same mediocrity we have now.

Well, Lambright couldn't win with Lambright's team, so Rick did something right.

The point is, fucktards who hate Rick, love Sark, and don't see the inconsistency in that. It's not that Rick was so awesome, he was marginally better than Sark, but the doogs hate his guts yet make excuses for Sark. It's out of the doog hand book.

By the way, the whole "coach X won with coach y's guys" is fucking stupid. Lambright had good players, but was mediocre. Rick took the team and had them champions in two years and #3 in the nation. Sark in 5 FUCKING years hasn't done a god damn thing except talk about how "close" they are. It doesn't matter whose players he has. He would have fucked up the 2000 team.

chuck · October 2013

I've never said RN sucked and don't believe it, but just to be clear, saying he sucked doesn't have to mean you like Sarkisian or think he's better.

One thing about RN that people seem to forget is that he didn't just take Lambright's team and ride them to glory in one year. That was a very incomplete team and it took two years to reach that #3 ranking. They were still incomplete at that point but found a way to win a bunch of tough games including one against a team that badly outmatched them on paper. I don't think it's any more accurate to give Lambright credit for that season than it is to give TW credit for Sark's glorious Holiday Bowl championship.

MikeDamone · October 2013

chuck said:
I've never said RN sucked and don't believe it, but just to be clear, saying he sucked doesn't have to mean you like Sarkisian or think he's better.

One thing about RN that people seem to forget is that he didn't just take Lambright's team and ride them to glory in one year. That was a very incomplete team and it took two years to reach that #3 ranking. They were still incomplete at that point but found a way to win a bunch of tough games including one against a team that badly outmatched them on paper. I don't think it's any more accurate to give Lambright credit for that season than it is to give TW credit for Sark's glorious Holiday Bowl championship.

Many many many people hate Rick and love Sark. Not saying you are one of them. It's doog 101.

chuck · October 2013

MikeDamone said:

show previous quotes
chuck said:
I've never said RN sucked and don't believe it, but just to be clear, saying he sucked doesn't have to mean you like Sarkisian or think he's better.

One thing about RN that people seem to forget is that he didn't just take Lambright's team and ride them to glory in one year. That was a very incomplete team and it took two years to reach that #3 ranking. They were still incomplete at that point but found a way to win a bunch of tough games including one against a team that badly outmatched them on paper. I don't think it's any more accurate to give Lambright credit for that season than it is to give TW credit for Sark's glorious Holiday Bowl championship.
Many many many people hate Rick and love Sark. Not saying you are one of them. It's doog 101.

I get that. I got a solid C+ in doog101. Just thought it was worth pointing that out.

RoadDawg55 · October 2013

Passion said:

show previous quotes
TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Passion said:

RaceBannon said:
claiming in Mora has been at UCLA 6 years in order to compare him to Sark you might be a flaming doog.

If you claim I have ever said Rick is anything other than better than Sark, which he is, you've reached IMALOSER territory in your life.

And if you compare Mora's season and a half to Pinkle's lengthy career you have a bitter and political agenda.

Anyone that knows football sees what is being built in Westwood. Whether Mora is the guy to finish it will be revealed in season three as always. There is nothing left to reveal in year six for Sark.

Seems like Husky fans would care about that.
Rick sucked. He sucked in colorado. He sucked at UW. He sucked at ucla.

I don't know if he's better or worse than Sark. I don't rate coaches that suck. They just suck...although ty reached an elevated status of suckiness.
Winning a Rose Bowl and popping off does not suck.

Hope this helps.
Sorry, that was Lambright's team. Besides, what happened afterward? The same mediocrity we have now.

Was Urban Meyer's first championship at Florida Zook's team? Meyer won a championship in year two. Rick won a Rose Bowl in year 2. I completely disagree with your post.

dnc · October 2013

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

show previous quotes
DingaLing said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

CollegeDoog said:
I may be a Broog but I see UCLA finishing 10-2 and playing again for a shot at the Rose Bowl. Fuck off doogs.
Colorado
@Arizona
Washington
Arizona State
@USC

UCLA should be favored in every game. Going 10-2 in Mora's second season clearly proves he's not good enough for UW. Just ask IMALOSER.
True, but Sark has a blueprint (provided by Stanford and Oregon) so does that change your prediction?

ASU isn't going to lie down and take 10.5" of Mora cock lightly, either.
ASU and UW both really, really suck on the road and UCLA is pretty good at home.

Given the sudden juvenation of Vanilla Vick, I think the game at Arizona might be the toughest one left for UCLA.

Someone tried to tell you guys that Denker is much better than andvertised. Not great. Maybe not even good. But far from the worst QB in the dreckfest conference.

topdawgnc · October 2013

Passion said:

show previous quotes
TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Passion said:

RaceBannon said:
claiming in Mora has been at UCLA 6 years in order to compare him to Sark you might be a flaming doog.

If you claim I have ever said Rick is anything other than better than Sark, which he is, you've reached IMALOSER territory in your life.

And if you compare Mora's season and a half to Pinkle's lengthy career you have a bitter and political agenda.

Anyone that knows football sees what is being built in Westwood. Whether Mora is the guy to finish it will be revealed in season three as always. There is nothing left to reveal in year six for Sark.

Seems like Husky fans would care about that.
Rick sucked. He sucked in colorado. He sucked at UW. He sucked at ucla.

I don't know if he's better or worse than Sark. I don't rate coaches that suck. They just suck...although ty reached an elevated status of suckiness.
Winning a Rose Bowl and popping off does not suck.

Hope this helps.
Sorry, that was Lambright's team. Besides, what happened afterward? The same mediocrity we have now.

Rick won the games he had to.

He only lost two of the Northwest Rival games.

He wasn't a good fit at Washington, but he was a winner ... and that's what matters most.

[Deleted User] · October 2013

DerekJohnson said:

show previous quotes
Passion said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Passion said:

RaceBannon said:
claiming in Mora has been at UCLA 6 years in order to compare him to Sark you might be a flaming doog.

If you claim I have ever said Rick is anything other than better than Sark, which he is, you've reached IMALOSER territory in your life.

And if you compare Mora's season and a half to Pinkle's lengthy career you have a bitter and political agenda.

Anyone that knows football sees what is being built in Westwood. Whether Mora is the guy to finish it will be revealed in season three as always. There is nothing left to reveal in year six for Sark.

Seems like Husky fans would care about that.
Rick sucked. He sucked in colorado. He sucked at UW. He sucked at ucla.

I don't know if he's better or worse than Sark. I don't rate coaches that suck. They just suck...although ty reached an elevated status of suckiness.
Winning a Rose Bowl and popping off does not suck.

Hope this helps.
Sorry, that was Lambright's team. Besides, what happened afterward? The same mediocrity we have now.
I interviewed over 30 players from the Rose Bowl team, and virtually all of the Lambo holdovers said that they felt beaten down by Lambo's last season, and would not have gotten to the Rose Bowl without Rick. Larry Tripplett said it was a perfect combo of Lambo toughness and free-wheelin' Rick (I'm paraphrasing).

I remember thinking that at the time. Looking back that was the last tough team that we had.Unlike Lambo teams that were worn out because he overworked them(other than 1996 the Huskies always finished badly under him).

It was a perfect blend of toughness and being loose with yourself. Tui was a perfect example of that. He made several big plays, he'd also make a lot of mistakes but Rick wasn't there to come down on his ass too hard. He let Tui be himself.

TierbsHsotBoobs · October 2013

dnc said:

show previous quotes
TierbsHsotBoobs said:

DingaLing said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

CollegeDoog said:
I may be a Broog but I see UCLA finishing 10-2 and playing again for a shot at the Rose Bowl. Fuck off doogs.
Colorado
@Arizona
Washington
Arizona State
@USC

UCLA should be favored in every game. Going 10-2 in Mora's second season clearly proves he's not good enough for UW. Just ask IMALOSER.
True, but Sark has a blueprint (provided by Stanford and Oregon) so does that change your prediction?

ASU isn't going to lie down and take 10.5" of Mora cock lightly, either.
ASU and UW both really, really suck on the road and UCLA is pretty good at home.

Given the sudden juvenation of Vanilla Vick, I think the game at Arizona might be the toughest one left for UCLA.
Someone tried to tell you guys that Denker is much better than andvertised. Not great. Maybe not even good. But far from the worst QB in the dreckfest conference.

He was just so, so, so fucking dreckfest against UW though.

dnc · October 2013

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

DingaLing said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

CollegeDoog said:
I may be a Broog but I see UCLA finishing 10-2 and playing again for a shot at the Rose Bowl. Fuck off doogs.
Colorado
@Arizona
Washington
Arizona State
@USC

UCLA should be favored in every game. Going 10-2 in Mora's second season clearly proves he's not good enough for UW. Just ask IMALOSER.
True, but Sark has a blueprint (provided by Stanford and Oregon) so does that change your prediction?

ASU isn't going to lie down and take 10.5" of Mora cock lightly, either.
ASU and UW both really, really suck on the road and UCLA is pretty good at home.

Given the sudden juvenation of Vanilla Vick, I think the game at Arizona might be the toughest one left for UCLA.
Someone tried to tell you guys that Denker is much better than andvertised. Not great. Maybe not even good. But far from the worst QB in the dreckfest conference.
He was just so, so, so fucking dreckfest against UW though.

Indeed.

I think the wind/rain had more to do with that than we originally gave it credit for. He's looked surprisingly confident the other couple of times I've seen him.

If you have to resort to

Comments

Welcome!

Welcome!

Quick Links