Hugh thinks
Comments
-
That's what she said.doogie said:If we run we're toast. No shot, he says.
We need line of scrimmage reads, pre- determined routes and quick release passes into space.
In other words, Hugh thinks that in order to have any shot at winning, we need to run Mike Leach''s offense and play like Cuogs???
-
Double TE all game and sample and dissly need at least 8 catches combined. We have to keep their Edge at home with the TE threat.
-
Alabama is smaller on defense than they used to be. Line up Dissly or Sample in the pseudo, shotgun offset I and run power right at them. Guard pulls and the TE in the backfield gets anyone who filters through.
I do think it is more of a game for Coleman than Gaskin. That patient, wait for the holes shit doesnt seem like a recipe for success against Bama's speed.
Really though, UW has to commit to the run even if it's not successful. We are fucked if Bama can just pin their ears back every down. -
What are Hugh's thoughts on the turf?
Who has the advantage on fake grass?
Does the game mean more to UW than Bama?
What is Browning's thigh size compared to Hurts? Who has longer finger nails?
Does UW have more players with longer hair than Bama's? Hair length could be all the difference? -
Balanced offense with short, screen type passes to Ross and McClatcher. The way to beat any great defense is to keep them off balance. We probably need a wrinkle like TE's more involved or constantly moving Ross around as a decoy.
-
Hugh has about the worst track record in the history of prognosticators.
Run the ball off-guard the whole game.
Prediction: UW will have 30 rushes for 100 yards going into the 4th quarter. Then Coleman breaks one.
Go back and look at how Arizona beat UW in 92.
Giving up on the run is a death sentence, -
We need Tedford right now so bad.
-
This right here.RoadDawg55 said:Alabama is smaller on defense than they used to be. Line up Dissly or Sample in the pseudo, shotgun offset I and run power right at them. Guard pulls and the TE in the backfield gets anyone who filters through.
I do think it is more of a game for Coleman than Gaskin. That patient, wait for the holes shit doesnt seem like a recipe for success against Bama's speed.
Really though, UW has to commit to the run even if it's not successful. We are fucked if Bama can just pin their ears back every down. -
Uhh no, he basically just reiterated what Pup told orangeslice today. quick passes, especially on 1st downs until the run finds an identity. If Bama is behind, for really the 1st time all year, Gaskin and his style will find little creases go bust through. Harris meet Reuban Foster.doogie said:If we run we're toast. No shot, he says.
We need line of scrimmage reads, pre- determined routes and quick release passes into space.
In other words, Hugh thinks that in order to have any shot at winning, we need to run Mike Leach''s offense and play like Cuogs???
Straight u p, no way to run on them. But Chad Kelly has thrown over a half mile on them in 2 years. Difference? Ole miss had zero fucking running game to make Bama pay. Washington does, and wont try to r u n straight at them (see Stanford). Conversely UW could run on USC. ..they ditched it, didnt force it and lost. But to say Hugh meant that we need to run Leach's offense shows what a buttfucking idiot you are. What's new around here -
Listen sally, just shut shut your ignernt cunt. Enough of this silly pillow-biting talkQuietcowskee said:We need Tedford right now so bad.
