Fozzy to Stanford
Comments
-
I love Strausser and think it's beyond retarded to complain about him for any reason.whuggy said:
We haven't got Banner this year andRoadDawg55 said:
We didn't survive no Garnett or Banner at all. Weird logic.whuggy said:
Yep. We survived no Garnett and Banner.Meek said:Look, our smallest, youngest and weakest offensive lineman who is a true freshman and was maybe a 3* is the guy that the tv announcers are praising week in and week out for his amazing play.
i think we'll be okay without mr. sarrell.
But 2018 I hope the recruiting focuses on
both lines. That's how you stay elite.
The 2013-2015 teams would have been quite a bit better with those guys, especially Garnett.
Banner would have thrived under Petersen. No way would this staff let him weigh 380 like he did at USC.
have a pretty damn good line. If we don't
have Sarell next year we'll still have a better
line than this year. Pretty straightfoward
to me. Love to have him but people wetting
their pants when it looks like he's headed
elsewhere, WTF? Strauser seems pretty damn good
at development. Don't think Shelton or Eldenkramp
were very high rated but look where they are now.
And Harris is the next low rated jewel.
If Fozzy doesn't come, he doesn't come. Not much more anyone could have done than win the conference, show we can have a great OL, and have the head coach arrive in a helicopter to a high school game. -
- if we have the last visit before the AA game then we have a chance.
- if there's any talk of Shaw testing NFL waters then we have a shot (haven't heard much lately)
- where's the girlfriend going?
- looks like mom probably wants Stanford, shes in charge of his recruiting, everything goes though her. it's like that gladiator line, win the crowd (mom) and win your freedom (commit).
- if he takes a good look at the empty seats and the lack of football support ... That's an important part of the football experience.
- on another note, with Kennedy polamalu gone from UCLA, here's hoping Jaelen Phillips takes a good look at other options. That guy is a beast (if johnson sticks with Miami)
- since I'm adding value to this bored, do I get fellatio or just a cookie from Dennis? -
I'm kind of getting the feeling that Tiger momanimate said:- if we have the last visit before the AA game then we have a chance.
- if there's any talk of Shaw testing NFL waters then we have a shot (haven't heard much lately)
- where's the girlfriend going?
- looks like mom probably wants Stanford, shes in charge of his recruiting, everything goes though her. it's like that gladiator line, win the crowd (mom) and win your freedom (commit).
- if he takes a good look at the empty seats and the lack of football support ... That's an important part of the football experience.
- on another note, with Kennedy polamalu gone from UCLA, here's hoping Jaelen Phillips takes a good look at other options. That guy is a beast (if johnson sticks with Miami)
- since I'm adding value to this bored, do I get fellatio or just a cookie from Dennis?
is holding a lot of sway too. More interested in
Tufele and Phillips to tell you the truth. -
fuck her!whuggy said:
I'm kind of getting the feeling that Tiger momanimate said:- if we have the last visit before the AA game then we have a chance.
- if there's any talk of Shaw testing NFL waters then we have a shot (haven't heard much lately)
- where's the girlfriend going?
- looks like mom probably wants Stanford, shes in charge of his recruiting, everything goes though her. it's like that gladiator line, win the crowd (mom) and win your freedom (commit).
- if he takes a good look at the empty seats and the lack of football support ... That's an important part of the football experience.
- on another note, with Kennedy polamalu gone from UCLA, here's hoping Jaelen Phillips takes a good look at other options. That guy is a beast (if johnson sticks with Miami)
- since I'm adding value to this bored, do I get fellatio or just a cookie from Dennis?
is holding a lot of swaye too. More interested in
Tufele and Phillips to tell you the truth.
-
Assuming that Fozzy doesn't come here (LIPO) ... you do realize that when it comes to the 3 primary OL targets that we had this year in this class we will have gotten 1 of 3?RoadDawg55 said:
I love Strausser and think it's beyond retarded to complain about him for any reason.whuggy said:
We haven't got Banner this year andRoadDawg55 said:
We didn't survive no Garnett or Banner at all. Weird logic.whuggy said:
Yep. We survived no Garnett and Banner.Meek said:Look, our smallest, youngest and weakest offensive lineman who is a true freshman and was maybe a 3* is the guy that the tv announcers are praising week in and week out for his amazing play.
i think we'll be okay without mr. sarrell.
But 2018 I hope the recruiting focuses on
both lines. That's how you stay elite.
The 2013-2015 teams would have been quite a bit better with those guys, especially Garnett.
Banner would have thrived under Petersen. No way would this staff let him weigh 380 like he did at USC.
have a pretty damn good line. If we don't
have Sarell next year we'll still have a better
line than this year. Pretty straightfoward
to me. Love to have him but people wetting
their pants when it looks like he's headed
elsewhere, WTF? Strauser seems pretty damn good
at development. Don't think Shelton or Eldenkramp
were very high rated but look where they are now.
And Harris is the next low rated jewel.
If Fozzy doesn't come, he doesn't come. Not much more anyone could have done than win the conference, show we can have a great OL, and have the head coach arrive in a helicopter to a high school game.
The one we got is a local kid ...
The local national recruit (top 5 player by any service) is going to Stanford ...
The out of state kid from the Bay Area who is coached by a UW legend has chosen USC ...
IF this program is to compete at a national level, as others have stated, it will be because we are able to compete first and foremost on the OL. The reality is that the top 2 targets we had in this class we'll likely miss on both. Bainivalu is a really good OL prospect and nothing to sneeze at ... but if he is your 3rd OL in the class you are dancing in the streets. If he's your top OL recruit in this class then you probably aren't building the kind of combination of depth/talent needed to compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, Michigan, and even USC's to the point where you walk onto the field knowing you are going to beat them.
What other positional groupings on the field can you say that about going forward given what is currently on the roster and where this class has recruited?
Still want to stand by the fact that it's beyond retarted to complain about Strausser for any reason? -
The line of thought of, "can't blame a kid for going to Stanford," is absurd.
There are a myriad of ways to be successful in life. Success doesn't route strictly through.
Tiger Woods went to Stanford. He is without question a net negative to society. Total scum.
What did he gain from going Stanford? -
We already are competing on a national level, so yes it is beyond retarded to complain about the OL coach of a really good OL from a team very likely to make the playoff. I've only posted that line of thought maybe 20-25 times.Tequilla said:
Assuming that Fozzy doesn't come here (LIPO) ... you do realize that when it comes to the 3 primary OL targets that we had this year in this class we will have gotten 1 of 3?RoadDawg55 said:
I love Strausser and think it's beyond retarded to complain about him for any reason.whuggy said:
We haven't got Banner this year andRoadDawg55 said:
We didn't survive no Garnett or Banner at all. Weird logic.whuggy said:
Yep. We survived no Garnett and Banner.Meek said:Look, our smallest, youngest and weakest offensive lineman who is a true freshman and was maybe a 3* is the guy that the tv announcers are praising week in and week out for his amazing play.
i think we'll be okay without mr. sarrell.
But 2018 I hope the recruiting focuses on
both lines. That's how you stay elite.
The 2013-2015 teams would have been quite a bit better with those guys, especially Garnett.
Banner would have thrived under Petersen. No way would this staff let him weigh 380 like he did at USC.
have a pretty damn good line. If we don't
have Sarell next year we'll still have a better
line than this year. Pretty straightfoward
to me. Love to have him but people wetting
their pants when it looks like he's headed
elsewhere, WTF? Strauser seems pretty damn good
at development. Don't think Shelton or Eldenkramp
were very high rated but look where they are now.
And Harris is the next low rated jewel.
If Fozzy doesn't come, he doesn't come. Not much more anyone could have done than win the conference, show we can have a great OL, and have the head coach arrive in a helicopter to a high school game.
The one we got is a local kid ...
The local national recruit (top 5 player by any service) is going to Stanford ...
The out of state kid from the Bay Area who is coached by a UW legend has chosen USC ...
IF this program is to compete at a national level, as others have stated, it will be because we are able to compete first and foremost on the OL. The reality is that the top 2 targets we had in this class we'll likely miss on both. Bainivalu is a really good OL prospect and nothing to sneeze at ... but if he is your 3rd OL in the class you are dancing in the streets. If he's your top OL recruit in this class then you probably aren't building the kind of combination of depth/talent needed to compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, Michigan, and even USC's to the point where you walk onto the field knowing you are going to beat them.
What other positional groupings on the field can you say that about going forward given what is currently on the roster and where this class has recruited?
Still want to stand by the fact that it's beyond retarted to complain about Strausser for any reason? -
If UW can get 1 out of 3 primary OL targets every year that's a hell of a success rate.Tequilla said:
Assuming that Fozzy doesn't come here (LIPO) ... you do realize that when it comes to the 3 primary OL targets that we had this year in this class we will have gotten 1 of 3?RoadDawg55 said:
I love Strausser and think it's beyond retarded to complain about him for any reason.whuggy said:
We haven't got Banner this year andRoadDawg55 said:
We didn't survive no Garnett or Banner at all. Weird logic.whuggy said:
Yep. We survived no Garnett and Banner.Meek said:Look, our smallest, youngest and weakest offensive lineman who is a true freshman and was maybe a 3* is the guy that the tv announcers are praising week in and week out for his amazing play.
i think we'll be okay without mr. sarrell.
But 2018 I hope the recruiting focuses on
both lines. That's how you stay elite.
The 2013-2015 teams would have been quite a bit better with those guys, especially Garnett.
Banner would have thrived under Petersen. No way would this staff let him weigh 380 like he did at USC.
have a pretty damn good line. If we don't
have Sarell next year we'll still have a better
line than this year. Pretty straightfoward
to me. Love to have him but people wetting
their pants when it looks like he's headed
elsewhere, WTF? Strauser seems pretty damn good
at development. Don't think Shelton or Eldenkramp
were very high rated but look where they are now.
And Harris is the next low rated jewel.
If Fozzy doesn't come, he doesn't come. Not much more anyone could have done than win the conference, show we can have a great OL, and have the head coach arrive in a helicopter to a high school game.
The one we got is a local kid ...
The local national recruit (top 5 player by any service) is going to Stanford ...
The out of state kid from the Bay Area who is coached by a UW legend has chosen USC ...
IF this program is to compete at a national level, as others have stated, it will be because we are able to compete first and foremost on the OL. The reality is that the top 2 targets we had in this class we'll likely miss on both. Bainivalu is a really good OL prospect and nothing to sneeze at ... but if he is your 3rd OL in the class you are dancing in the streets. If he's your top OL recruit in this class then you probably aren't building the kind of combination of depth/talent needed to compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, Michigan, and even USC's to the point where you walk onto the field knowing you are going to beat them.
What other positional groupings on the field can you say that about going forward given what is currently on the roster and where this class has recruited?
Still want to stand by the fact that it's beyond retarted to complain about Strausser for any reason?
1 out of 3 in recruiting is really good. -
Wearing red.jecornel said:The line of thought of, "can't blame a kid for going to Stanford," is absurd.
There are a myriad of ways to be successful in life. Success doesn't route strictly through.
Tiger Woods went to Stanford. He is without question a net negative to society. Total scum.
What did he gain from going Stanford? -
Remind me why the fuck you are here againjecornel said:The line of thought of, "can't blame a kid for going to Stanford," is absurd.
There are a myriad of ways to be successful in life. Success doesn't route strictly through.
Tiger Woods went to Stanford. He is without question a net negative to society. Total scum.
What did he gain from going Stanford?






