Fozzy to Stanford

pat_hm

The program isn't going to tank without Sarrell. However the only way this team is ever going to be able to beat Ohio State or Bama or Auburn is in the trenches. This kid was dominating the best defensive lineman in the country at the Opening and he is was born and raised 30 minutes from UW. It would be a massive disappointment to not pull him in especially with every other legit in state kid committed to Washington.

I think last season is when Foster became attached to the idea of him going to Stanford. UW was 7-6 and Stanford was in the Rose Bowl so it made the choice easier. Washington's success this season has made him question that notion a bit but I'd still say Stanford is the favorite.

The visit in December is our final chance. Petersen is going to go all in. He is apparently committing at the All American Game and then planning on taking a visit to Stanford thereafter. Technically we have the last visit before he commits..

This is my big question: is the fact he is choosing to commit at the All American game a positive or negative for UW? Picking a Stanford hat in San Antonio as opposed to his high school gym certainly wouldn't create as much backfire. Or is he trying to make a statement for UW by choosing us on National TV? It's tough to call.

pat_hm

RoadDawg55 said:

pat_hm said:

Do any of you TBS's remember Kyle Murphy? He was the 5 star LT out of San Clemente who committed to #NerdNation the same class at Future Doctor Garnett.

Can't miss guy right? Offers from everywhere going to the perceived best school for offensive lineman development on the west coast. Future first round pick, right?

The problem for Stanford all they could do was "develop" him into a 6TH FUCKING ROUND PICK. He got worse at Stanford. He turned into a soft bitch. Yet no one mentions this. Cleary the lineman myth is alive and well in Palo Alto.

He was like 250 pounds coming out of high school. I hardly count those guys, even when they get 5 stars because they are so far from physically being able to compete at a P5 school.

He didn't redshirt and made an All Conference team. He maybe wasn't a huge star, but he's hardly a bust either.

Peat, DeCastro, and Garnett - first round
7 OL drafted since 2012

I doubt any PAC 12 school can match that. How is it a myth because one five star guy was drafted in the 6th round?

That said, Fozzy is a pussy for going to Stanford when the hometown school will be competing for titles.

Fuck Stanford

pat_hm

I didn't know we had so many closet Stanford fans on this bored.

Passion

pat_hm said:

The program isn't going to tank without Sarrell. However the only way this team is ever going to be able to beat Ohio State or Bama or Auburn is in the trenches. This kid was dominating the best defensive lineman in the country at the Opening and he is was born and raised 30 minutes from UW. It would be a massive disappointment to not pull him in especially with every other legit in state kid committed to Washington.

I think last season is when Foster became attached to the idea of him going to Stanford. UW was 7-6 and Stanford was in the Rose Bowl so it made the choice easier. Washington's success this season has made him question that notion a bit but I'd still say Stanford is the favorite.

The visit in December is our final chance. Petersen is going to go all in. He is apparently committing at the All American Game and then planning on taking a visit to Stanford thereafter. Technically we have the last visit before he commits..

This is my big question: is the fact he is choosing to commit at the All American game a positive or negative for UW? Picking a Stanford hat in San Antonio as opposed to his high school gym certainly wouldn't create as much backfire. Or is he trying to make a statement for UW by choosing us on National TV? It's tough to call.

Umm...not a tough call. He's not making a choice in his home state (Washington). Instead he's doing it on a neutral site. Bad sign.

Then he's traveling to stanford right after that.

Looks pretty clear tome. He gone.

RoadDawg55

pat_hm said:

RoadDawg55 said:

pat_hm said:

Do any of you TBS's remember Kyle Murphy? He was the 5 star LT out of San Clemente who committed to #NerdNation the same class at Future Doctor Garnett.

Can't miss guy right? Offers from everywhere going to the perceived best school for offensive lineman development on the west coast. Future first round pick, right?

The problem for Stanford all they could do was "develop" him into a 6TH FUCKING ROUND PICK. He got worse at Stanford. He turned into a soft bitch. Yet no one mentions this. Cleary the lineman myth is alive and well in Palo Alto.

He was like 250 pounds coming out of high school. I hardly count those guys, even when they get 5 stars because they are so far from physically being able to compete at a P5 school.

He didn't redshirt and made an All Conference team. He maybe wasn't a huge star, but he's hardly a bust either.

Peat, DeCastro, and Garnett - first round
7 OL drafted since 2012

I doubt any PAC 12 school can match that. How is it a myth because one five star guy was drafted in the 6th round?

That said, Fozzy is a pussy for going to Stanford when the hometown school will be competing for titles.

Fuck Stanford

I don't like Stanford at all, but it is what it is. They have churned out more NFL OL than the other schools in the PAC 12 in recent years.

NeGgaPlEaSe

pat_hm said:

Do any of you TBS's remember Kyle Murphy? He was the 5 star LT out of San Clemente who committed to #NerdNation the same class at Future Doctor Garnett.

Can't miss guy right? Offers from everywhere going to the perceived best school for offensive lineman development on the west coast. Future first round pick, right?

The problem for Stanford all they could do was "develop" him into a 6TH FUCKING ROUND PICK. He got worse at Stanford. He turned into a soft bitch. Yet no one mentions this. Cleary the lineman myth is alive and well in Palo Alto.

Wasn't Mark Brunel a 5th or 6th round pick
Anyway he gone

RoadDawg55

whuggy said:

Meek said:

Look, our smallest, youngest and weakest offensive lineman who is a true freshman and was maybe a 3* is the guy that the tv announcers are praising week in and week out for his amazing play.

i think we'll be okay without mr. sarrell.

Yep. We survived no Garnett and Banner.
But 2018 I hope the recruiting focuses on
both lines. That's how you stay elite.

We didn't survive no Garnett or Banner at all. Weird logic.

The 2013-2015 teams would have been quite a bit better with those guys, especially Garnett.

Banner would have thrived under Petersen. No way would this staff let him weigh 380 like he did at USC.

FreeChavez

pat_hm said:

I didn't know we had so many closet Stanford fans on this bored.

WDWHA was left at the bored for losers. Go to DM.c if you want to play that doogism bullshit. UW would have been better with a talented OL, such as banner or garnett.

Doogs seriously can't look outside the helmet, and only rip fellow fans when someone states the obvious and it conflicts with their doogism. It's okay to say that another team is good, or offers something better than UW. Such as an education at Stanford, or song girls at USC, or weed at Kal(okay, that was over the line).

Go Fozzy yourself

bananasnblondes

If Fozzy cares about his development as a football player, I'd present him with two important case studies.

Exhibit A: UW had 3 All-conference linemen this year, Stanford had 0.

Exhibit B: Video montage of Casey Tucker's play vs. UW. He was the Foster Sarrell of 3 years ago (top OT in the west) and Foster will likely be his heir at LT. The dude looked like freshman-year Shane Brostek against our defense.

whuggy

RoadDawg55 said:

whuggy said:

Meek said:

Look, our smallest, youngest and weakest offensive lineman who is a true freshman and was maybe a 3* is the guy that the tv announcers are praising week in and week out for his amazing play.

i think we'll be okay without mr. sarrell.

Yep. We survived no Garnett and Banner.
But 2018 I hope the recruiting focuses on
both lines. That's how you stay elite.

We didn't survive no Garnett or Banner at all. Weird logic.

The 2013-2015 teams would have been quite a bit better with those guys, especially Garnett.

Banner would have thrived under Petersen. No way would this staff let him weigh 380 like he did at USC.

We haven't got Banner this year and
have a pretty damn good line. If we don't
have Sarell next year we'll still have a better
line than this year. Pretty straightfoward
to me. Love to have him but people wetting
their pants when it looks like he's headed
elsewhere, WTF? Strauser seems pretty damn good
at development. Don't think Shelton or Eldenkramp
were very high rated but look where they are now.
And Harris is the next low rated jewel.