Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Fozzy to Stanford

1235715

Comments

  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245
    - if we have the last visit before the AA game then we have a chance.
    - if there's any talk of Shaw testing NFL waters then we have a shot (haven't heard much lately)
    - where's the girlfriend going?
    - looks like mom probably wants Stanford, shes in charge of his recruiting, everything goes though her. it's like that gladiator line, win the crowd (mom) and win your freedom (commit).
    - if he takes a good look at the empty seats and the lack of football support ... That's an important part of the football experience.
    - on another note, with Kennedy polamalu gone from UCLA, here's hoping Jaelen Phillips takes a good look at other options. That guy is a beast (if johnson sticks with Miami)
    - since I'm adding value to this bored, do I get fellatio or just a cookie from Dennis?
  • whuggy
    whuggy Member Posts: 2,088
    animate said:

    - if we have the last visit before the AA game then we have a chance.
    - if there's any talk of Shaw testing NFL waters then we have a shot (haven't heard much lately)
    - where's the girlfriend going?
    - looks like mom probably wants Stanford, shes in charge of his recruiting, everything goes though her. it's like that gladiator line, win the crowd (mom) and win your freedom (commit).
    - if he takes a good look at the empty seats and the lack of football support ... That's an important part of the football experience.
    - on another note, with Kennedy polamalu gone from UCLA, here's hoping Jaelen Phillips takes a good look at other options. That guy is a beast (if johnson sticks with Miami)
    - since I'm adding value to this bored, do I get fellatio or just a cookie from Dennis?

    I'm kind of getting the feeling that Tiger mom
    is holding a lot of sway too. More interested in
    Tufele and Phillips to tell you the truth.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    edited November 2016
    whuggy said:

    animate said:

    - if we have the last visit before the AA game then we have a chance.
    - if there's any talk of Shaw testing NFL waters then we have a shot (haven't heard much lately)
    - where's the girlfriend going?
    - looks like mom probably wants Stanford, shes in charge of his recruiting, everything goes though her. it's like that gladiator line, win the crowd (mom) and win your freedom (commit).
    - if he takes a good look at the empty seats and the lack of football support ... That's an important part of the football experience.
    - on another note, with Kennedy polamalu gone from UCLA, here's hoping Jaelen Phillips takes a good look at other options. That guy is a beast (if johnson sticks with Miami)
    - since I'm adding value to this bored, do I get fellatio or just a cookie from Dennis?

    I'm kind of getting the feeling that Tiger mom
    is holding a lot of swaye too. More interested in
    Tufele and Phillips to tell you the truth.
    fuck her!

    image
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,261

    whuggy said:

    whuggy said:

    Meek said:

    Look, our smallest, youngest and weakest offensive lineman who is a true freshman and was maybe a 3* is the guy that the tv announcers are praising week in and week out for his amazing play.

    i think we'll be okay without mr. sarrell.

    Yep. We survived no Garnett and Banner.
    But 2018 I hope the recruiting focuses on
    both lines. That's how you stay elite.
    We didn't survive no Garnett or Banner at all. Weird logic.

    The 2013-2015 teams would have been quite a bit better with those guys, especially Garnett.

    Banner would have thrived under Petersen. No way would this staff let him weigh 380 like he did at USC.
    We haven't got Banner this year and
    have a pretty damn good line. If we don't
    have Sarell next year we'll still have a better
    line than this year. Pretty straightfoward
    to me. Love to have him but people wetting
    their pants when it looks like he's headed
    elsewhere, WTF? Strauser seems pretty damn good
    at development. Don't think Shelton or Eldenkramp
    were very high rated but look where they are now.
    And Harris is the next low rated jewel.
    I love Strausser and think it's beyond retarded to complain about him for any reason.

    If Fozzy doesn't come, he doesn't come. Not much more anyone could have done than win the conference, show we can have a great OL, and have the head coach arrive in a helicopter to a high school game.
    Assuming that Fozzy doesn't come here (LIPO) ... you do realize that when it comes to the 3 primary OL targets that we had this year in this class we will have gotten 1 of 3?

    The one we got is a local kid ...

    The local national recruit (top 5 player by any service) is going to Stanford ...

    The out of state kid from the Bay Area who is coached by a UW legend has chosen USC ...

    IF this program is to compete at a national level, as others have stated, it will be because we are able to compete first and foremost on the OL. The reality is that the top 2 targets we had in this class we'll likely miss on both. Bainivalu is a really good OL prospect and nothing to sneeze at ... but if he is your 3rd OL in the class you are dancing in the streets. If he's your top OL recruit in this class then you probably aren't building the kind of combination of depth/talent needed to compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, Michigan, and even USC's to the point where you walk onto the field knowing you are going to beat them.

    What other positional groupings on the field can you say that about going forward given what is currently on the roster and where this class has recruited?

    Still want to stand by the fact that it's beyond retarted to complain about Strausser for any reason?
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    The line of thought of, "can't blame a kid for going to Stanford," is absurd.

    There are a myriad of ways to be successful in life. Success doesn't route strictly through.

    Tiger Woods went to Stanford. He is without question a net negative to society. Total scum.

    What did he gain from going Stanford?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,554 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited November 2016
    Tequilla said:

    whuggy said:

    whuggy said:

    Meek said:

    Look, our smallest, youngest and weakest offensive lineman who is a true freshman and was maybe a 3* is the guy that the tv announcers are praising week in and week out for his amazing play.

    i think we'll be okay without mr. sarrell.

    Yep. We survived no Garnett and Banner.
    But 2018 I hope the recruiting focuses on
    both lines. That's how you stay elite.
    We didn't survive no Garnett or Banner at all. Weird logic.

    The 2013-2015 teams would have been quite a bit better with those guys, especially Garnett.

    Banner would have thrived under Petersen. No way would this staff let him weigh 380 like he did at USC.
    We haven't got Banner this year and
    have a pretty damn good line. If we don't
    have Sarell next year we'll still have a better
    line than this year. Pretty straightfoward
    to me. Love to have him but people wetting
    their pants when it looks like he's headed
    elsewhere, WTF? Strauser seems pretty damn good
    at development. Don't think Shelton or Eldenkramp
    were very high rated but look where they are now.
    And Harris is the next low rated jewel.
    I love Strausser and think it's beyond retarded to complain about him for any reason.

    If Fozzy doesn't come, he doesn't come. Not much more anyone could have done than win the conference, show we can have a great OL, and have the head coach arrive in a helicopter to a high school game.
    Assuming that Fozzy doesn't come here (LIPO) ... you do realize that when it comes to the 3 primary OL targets that we had this year in this class we will have gotten 1 of 3?

    The one we got is a local kid ...

    The local national recruit (top 5 player by any service) is going to Stanford ...

    The out of state kid from the Bay Area who is coached by a UW legend has chosen USC ...

    IF this program is to compete at a national level, as others have stated, it will be because we are able to compete first and foremost on the OL. The reality is that the top 2 targets we had in this class we'll likely miss on both. Bainivalu is a really good OL prospect and nothing to sneeze at ... but if he is your 3rd OL in the class you are dancing in the streets. If he's your top OL recruit in this class then you probably aren't building the kind of combination of depth/talent needed to compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, Michigan, and even USC's to the point where you walk onto the field knowing you are going to beat them.

    What other positional groupings on the field can you say that about going forward given what is currently on the roster and where this class has recruited?

    Still want to stand by the fact that it's beyond retarted to complain about Strausser for any reason?
    We already are competing on a national level, so yes it is beyond retarded to complain about the OL coach of a really good OL from a team very likely to make the playoff. I've only posted that line of thought maybe 20-25 times.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    Tequilla said:

    whuggy said:

    whuggy said:

    Meek said:

    Look, our smallest, youngest and weakest offensive lineman who is a true freshman and was maybe a 3* is the guy that the tv announcers are praising week in and week out for his amazing play.

    i think we'll be okay without mr. sarrell.

    Yep. We survived no Garnett and Banner.
    But 2018 I hope the recruiting focuses on
    both lines. That's how you stay elite.
    We didn't survive no Garnett or Banner at all. Weird logic.

    The 2013-2015 teams would have been quite a bit better with those guys, especially Garnett.

    Banner would have thrived under Petersen. No way would this staff let him weigh 380 like he did at USC.
    We haven't got Banner this year and
    have a pretty damn good line. If we don't
    have Sarell next year we'll still have a better
    line than this year. Pretty straightfoward
    to me. Love to have him but people wetting
    their pants when it looks like he's headed
    elsewhere, WTF? Strauser seems pretty damn good
    at development. Don't think Shelton or Eldenkramp
    were very high rated but look where they are now.
    And Harris is the next low rated jewel.
    I love Strausser and think it's beyond retarded to complain about him for any reason.

    If Fozzy doesn't come, he doesn't come. Not much more anyone could have done than win the conference, show we can have a great OL, and have the head coach arrive in a helicopter to a high school game.
    Assuming that Fozzy doesn't come here (LIPO) ... you do realize that when it comes to the 3 primary OL targets that we had this year in this class we will have gotten 1 of 3?

    The one we got is a local kid ...

    The local national recruit (top 5 player by any service) is going to Stanford ...

    The out of state kid from the Bay Area who is coached by a UW legend has chosen USC ...

    IF this program is to compete at a national level, as others have stated, it will be because we are able to compete first and foremost on the OL. The reality is that the top 2 targets we had in this class we'll likely miss on both. Bainivalu is a really good OL prospect and nothing to sneeze at ... but if he is your 3rd OL in the class you are dancing in the streets. If he's your top OL recruit in this class then you probably aren't building the kind of combination of depth/talent needed to compete with the Alabama's, Ohio State's, Michigan, and even USC's to the point where you walk onto the field knowing you are going to beat them.

    What other positional groupings on the field can you say that about going forward given what is currently on the roster and where this class has recruited?

    Still want to stand by the fact that it's beyond retarted to complain about Strausser for any reason?
    If UW can get 1 out of 3 primary OL targets every year that's a hell of a success rate.

    1 out of 3 in recruiting is really good.
  • Ice_Holmvik
    Ice_Holmvik Member Posts: 2,912
    jecornel said:

    The line of thought of, "can't blame a kid for going to Stanford," is absurd.

    There are a myriad of ways to be successful in life. Success doesn't route strictly through.

    Tiger Woods went to Stanford. He is without question a net negative to society. Total scum.

    What did he gain from going Stanford?

    Wearing red.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,066 Founders Club
    jecornel said:

    The line of thought of, "can't blame a kid for going to Stanford," is absurd.

    There are a myriad of ways to be successful in life. Success doesn't route strictly through.

    Tiger Woods went to Stanford. He is without question a net negative to society. Total scum.

    What did he gain from going Stanford?

    Remind me why the fuck you are here again