Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Isis attack on OSU campus
Comments
-
In addition to that...ThomasFremont said:
Standing Rock
...delegitimization of protestors as being paid or incited by the media
...demanding the Hamilton cast apologize for their expression of free speech
...religious considerations in immigration (aka no Muslims allowed)
...attacks on the free press, wanting to "open up libel laws" (though now he walked this back some)...
...so he campaigned against freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of assembly...
...he hasn't "trampled" the 1st yet for the simple fact that he's not yet president, but if he continues to pull this bullshit while in office, using the full weight of the executive branch, then yeah, he will be trampling all over it.
-
Is there any point you're trying to invent?
-
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.doogie said:Is there any point you're trying to invent?
Evidently the president is exempt. -
The hysteria is real. Get under the bed girls the first ammendment is under assault! !!!!!
Nothing you wrote is true or a first ammendment issue but good effort good job -
So if Trump called you a fucking retard he'd be infringing on your 1st amendment rights? Good to know...HardlyClothed said:
In addition to that...
...delegitimization of protestors as being paid or incited by the media
...demanding the Hamilton cast apologize for their expression of free speech
...religious considerations in immigration (aka no Muslims allowed)
...attacks on the free press, wanting to "open up libel laws" (though now he walked this back some)...
...so he campaigned against freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of assembly...
...he hasn't "trampled" the 1st yet for the simple fact that he's not yet president, but if he continues to pull this bullshit while in office, using the full weight of the executive branch, then yeah, he will be trampling all over it. -
See, that's just not the case. But enjoy the new post-truth country you've ushered in.RaceBannon said:The hysteria is real. Get under the bed girls the first ammendment is under assault! !!!!!
Nothing you wrote is true or a first ammendment issue but good effort good job -
So telling the cast of Hamilton to fuck off takes away first ammendment rights?ThomasFremont said:
See, that's just not the case. But enjoy the new post-truth country you've ushered in.
Take a midol -
Funny.RaceBannon said:
So telling the cast of Hamilton to fuck off takes away first ammendment rights?
Take a midol
I'd say the same to your dear leader for even giving a fuck about what the cast of a Broadway musical said.
The Mormons and I had a good laugh at his wet paper thin skin. -
Bring thin skinned and asking for an apology is different than infringing on the 1st amendment. But you're a sensitive liberal, so I wouldn't expect you to know the difference.ThomasFremont said:
Funny.
I'd say the same to your dear leader for even giving a fuck about what the cast of a Broadway musical said.
The Mormons and I had a good laugh at his wet paper thin skin. -
The only time in recent memory that a political leader demanded an apology from some actors, it was Kim Jung Un.greenblood said:
Bring thin skinned and asking for an apology is different than infringing on the 1st amendment. But you're a sensitive liberal, so I wouldn't expect you to know the difference.
Great company to keep. -
Kim jung un will explode a missile up your ass, trump will make fun of you on twitter. Learn the difference, then grow a pair, or take a midol.ThomasFremont said:
The only time in recent memory that a political leader demanded an apology from some actors, it was Kim Jung Un.
Great company to keep. -
2 fat daddy's boys that inherited their empires.greenblood said:
Kim jung un will explode a missile up your ass, trump will make fun of you on twitter. Learn the difference, then grow a pair, or take a midol.
Sorry, the similarities are unmistakable. -
If people want to harm others with no regard to their own well being they will be successful.
Now the smart money is to figure out what demograpic is doing this the most. Of course not everyone that does something like this is of that key demographic, but most are.
A perfect example is a Pitt Bull. Your junior high graduate neighbor will tell you they are the nicest dogs ever and they get a bad rap as his murder machine is biting through a cow femur with almost zero effort behind you. Then you look at the statistics and the breed of dog involved in an overwhelming number of fatal dog attacks compared to any other breed is a Pitt Bull.
As a responsible adult you don't buy a Pitt Bull. You don't allow your children to play around one. You keep your distance when you unexpectedly encounter one and you sure as fuck don't invite one into your house or into your yard.
Now being that same responsible adult you apply the same logic to Muslims. Seems logical and not so racist/prejudice now doesn't it?
-
That why all your butthole dems are calling for more gun control? Calling it an active shooter situation? Dem's it's whats for dummies.2001400ex said:Imagine the damage if he had a gun rather than a knife.
-
Ban assault knives he never even had to reload!dhdawg said:
because knives are able to easily mow down 10 people like that unlike assault weapons. Or at least that's what I've been told -
We know you can't pass the NICS check. Get over it!2001400ex said:
I know you are being sarcastic, but there are stricter controls over driving a vehicle than owning a gun. Then why would buying a knife require stricter controls than a gun?
Askin for a fren. -
Going for a quad post.
Hondo's gun. -
You seem bitter...ThomasFremont said:
2 fat daddy's boys that inherited their empires.
Sorry, the similarities are unmistakable. -
Who is calling for gun control? Komo4 buttfucker.Sledog said:
That why all your butthole dems are calling for more gun control? Calling it an active shooter situation? Dem's it's whats for dummies. -
Tim Kaine, for one.
Find it yourself, buttfucker -
Guns are designed to kill and are by far and away the most used object in human murders.Baseman said:Congress need to outlaw vehichles that go over 10 mph as well as hunting knives. There needs to be a law, too, requiring anyone who wants to buy steak knives submit to a background check and go through a 10-day waiting period to ensure they are not a convicted felon or are mentally ill.
-
Ok!doogie said:Tim Kaine, for one.
Find it yourself, buttfucker -
I'm hearing Tommy likes missiles exploding up his ass, at least that's what Puppy says. A "violent" tweet on the interwebs is surely more offending to those so inclined.greenblood said:
Kim jung un will explode a missile up your ass, trump will make fun of you on twitter. Learn the difference, then grow a pair, or take a midol. -
All your lefty hero's. It was reported as a active shooter for some time and many of your Castro "bro's" were already yapping about more gun control. Not like it's gonna happen in the trump admin but they yap. Then they try and back peddle when another Swedish Lutheran goes on a religious war attack on defenseless people.2001400ex said:
Who is calling for gun control? Komo4 buttfucker.
No change without chaos as your hero's say. -
Link. Buttfucker.Sledog said:
All your lefty hero's. It was reported as a active shooter for some time and many of your Castro "bro's" were already yapping about more gun control. Not like it's gonna happen in the trump admin but they yap. Then they try and back peddle when another Swedish Lutheran goes on a religious war attack on defenseless people.
No change without chaos as your hero's say. -
Just so you know driving a car is not a right. Bearing arms is.2001400ex said:
I know you are being sarcastic, but there are stricter controls over driving a vehicle than owning a gun. Then why would buying a knife require stricter controls than a gun?
Askin for a fren.
Odd how the left says requiring an ID to vote infringes on a right guaranteed in the constitution because poor people can't afford it (total bullshit) but I need an ID, background check and have thousands of restrictive laws controlling my 2A rights. In CA you now have to pay $50.00 to get a permit to buy ammo. Costs more than a DL.
I don't see the lefties protecting this basic right.
-
No need to link you as a buttfucker. Well established.2001400ex said:
Link. Buttfucker. -
Hillary was actually one of the most aggressive on gun control that I've seen. Probably a ploy to get the left to ignore all the other shit they hate her for.
Pretending like the proposals the democrats make are somehow gonna infringe on the gun rights of law abiding citizens is comical tho. Even background check bills that are widely popular are shot down because the republican party is bought off by the NRA.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/162083/americans-wanted-gun-background-checks-pass-senate.aspx
-
BUT THE CONSTITUTION!
-
I'm fairly certain a background check in no way infringing on law abiding citizens' gun rights while keeping them away from felons and terrorists would pass strict scrutiny.RaceBannon said:BUT THE CONSTITUTION!
