Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Isis attack on OSU campus
Comments
-
Yet no one has provided a link.doogie said:You can't be this fucking dumb. It's everywhere including CNN last night.
-
Have you not read his stupid bullshit before? He's dumber than a sack of hammers.dhdawg said:
you have to be lying. you cannot be that stupidSledog said:
Neither is the 2A. Gun crime isn't a big problem either. Probably a lower percentage of gun owners commit crime than voter fraud. So by your logic: No ID, no background check, no fees etc.dhdawg said:
1. Voter Fraud is not a huge issue in this country like what gun violence is. You and Trump can lie about it all you want, it just isn't.Sledog said:
Then being certain a person isn't voting illegally by impersonating another or not being a citizen shouldn't bother anyone either.dhdawg said:
I'm fairly certain a background check in no way infringing on law abiding citizens' gun rights while keeping them away from felons and terrorists would pass strict scrutiny.RaceBannon said:BUT THE CONSTITUTION!
2. and more importantly. I don't think anyone is pro voter fraud. You want to distribute a special ID to everyone in the country for free, have at it. Ballot by mail is actually the best and cheapest system. The problem is they aren't easily accessible, and they cost. Voting isn't a privilege.
And he's a huge pussy, too. -
A few voters in Washington state.ThomasFremont said:
Wut?Sledog said:
Neither is the 2A. Gun crime isn't a big problem either. Probably a lower percentage of gun owners commit crime than voter fraud. So by your logic: No ID, no background check, no fees etc.dhdawg said:
1. Voter Fraud is not a huge issue in this country like what gun violence is. You and Trump can lie about it all you want, it just isn't.Sledog said:
Then being certain a person isn't voting illegally by impersonating another or not being a citizen shouldn't bother anyone either.dhdawg said:
I'm fairly certain a background check in no way infringing on law abiding citizens' gun rights while keeping them away from felons and terrorists would pass strict scrutiny.RaceBannon said:BUT THE CONSTITUTION!
2. and more importantly. I don't think anyone is pro voter fraud. You want to distribute a special ID to everyone in the country for free, have at it. Ballot by mail is actually the best and cheapest system. The problem is they aren't easily accessible, and they cost. Voting isn't a privilege.
Still waiting for evidence of the "millions" of fraudulent votes...tick...tick...tick...
-
My mom died shortly before the election and I told my brother that at least Hillary would still be able to count on her vote.PurpleThrobber said:
A few voters in Washington state.ThomasFremont said:
Wut?Sledog said:
Neither is the 2A. Gun crime isn't a big problem either. Probably a lower percentage of gun owners commit crime than voter fraud. So by your logic: No ID, no background check, no fees etc.dhdawg said:
1. Voter Fraud is not a huge issue in this country like what gun violence is. You and Trump can lie about it all you want, it just isn't.Sledog said:
Then being certain a person isn't voting illegally by impersonating another or not being a citizen shouldn't bother anyone either.dhdawg said:
I'm fairly certain a background check in no way infringing on law abiding citizens' gun rights while keeping them away from felons and terrorists would pass strict scrutiny.RaceBannon said:BUT THE CONSTITUTION!
2. and more importantly. I don't think anyone is pro voter fraud. You want to distribute a special ID to everyone in the country for free, have at it. Ballot by mail is actually the best and cheapest system. The problem is they aren't easily accessible, and they cost. Voting isn't a privilege.
Still waiting for evidence of the "millions" of fraudulent votes...tick...tick...tick...
He glossed over that and said it was a shame she didn't live to see the first woman president. I don't think she had 8 more years in her -
Data. Care to provide it?PurpleThrobber said:
A few voters in Washington state.ThomasFremont said:
Wut?Sledog said:
Neither is the 2A. Gun crime isn't a big problem either. Probably a lower percentage of gun owners commit crime than voter fraud. So by your logic: No ID, no background check, no fees etc.dhdawg said:
1. Voter Fraud is not a huge issue in this country like what gun violence is. You and Trump can lie about it all you want, it just isn't.Sledog said:
Then being certain a person isn't voting illegally by impersonating another or not being a citizen shouldn't bother anyone either.dhdawg said:
I'm fairly certain a background check in no way infringing on law abiding citizens' gun rights while keeping them away from felons and terrorists would pass strict scrutiny.RaceBannon said:BUT THE CONSTITUTION!
2. and more importantly. I don't think anyone is pro voter fraud. You want to distribute a special ID to everyone in the country for free, have at it. Ballot by mail is actually the best and cheapest system. The problem is they aren't easily accessible, and they cost. Voting isn't a privilege.
Still waiting for evidence of the "millions" of fraudulent votes...tick...tick...tick...
-
No source or reason will ever allow a democrat to admit this shit goes on and they refuse to clean up voter registration roles as those illegally cast are usually for democratic candidates. Just ask Chicago.
http://thefederalist.com/2016/10/13/voter-fraud-real-heres-proof/
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/elections-expert-now-4-million-ineligible-dead-voters-american-voter-rolls-video/
-
There's a difference between people being on the voter rolls and actually voting.
-
And that federalist article is seriously reaching. When you have to reference a investigation that hasn't been completely you are really grasping at straws
-
But if you catch 100 people jaywalking,, doesn't mean only 100 people were jaywalking. So clearly the voter fraud is exponentially higher than the documented cases.dhdawg said:And that federalist article is seriously reaching. When you have to reference a investigation that hasn't been completely you are really grasping at straws





