Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hot Playoff Talk (not trolling)

2456

Comments

  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    I can't, for the life of me figure out why we try to pick 4 teams before the bowls instead of 2 teams after the bowls. It's so fucking stupid.

    Bowl tie ins that would make sense:

    Rose: Pac-12 vs. Big 10 (UW vs. Michigan)
    Sugar: SEC vs. ACC (Bama vs. Clemson)
    Orange: Big 12 vs. At Large 1 (Okie vs. Ohio State)
    Fiesta: At Large 2 vs. At Large 3 (Louisville vs. Western Mich - fuck it)

    Then you have an undefeated UW vs. an undefeated Clemson in the COMCAST BROUGHT TO YOU BY BUDLIGHT, POWERED BY AT&T NATTY BOWL, PRESENTED BY MONSANTO.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    I can't, for the life of me figure out why we try to pick 4 teams before the bowls instead of 2 teams after the bowls. It's so fucking stupid.

    Bowl tie ins that would make sense:

    Rose: Pac-12 vs. Big 10 (UW vs. Michigan)
    Sugar: SEC vs. ACC (Bama vs. Clemson)
    Orange: Big 12 vs. At Large 1 (Okie vs. Ohio State)
    Fiesta: At Large 2 vs. At Large 3 (Louisville vs. Western Mich - fuck it)

    Then you have an undefeated UW vs. an undefeated Clemson in the COMCAST BROUGHT TO YOU BY BUDLIGHT, POWERED BY AT&T NATTY BOWL, PRESENTED BY MONSANTO.

    That's pretty much the system we have now, dumbass.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    I can't, for the life of me figure out why we try to pick 4 teams before the bowls instead of 2 teams after the bowls. It's so fucking stupid.

    Bowl tie ins that would make sense:

    Rose: Pac-12 vs. Big 10 (UW vs. Michigan)
    Sugar: SEC vs. ACC (Bama vs. Clemson)
    Orange: Big 12 vs. At Large 1 (Okie vs. Ohio State)
    Fiesta: At Large 2 vs. At Large 3 (Louisville vs. Western Mich - fuck it)

    Then you have an undefeated UW vs. an undefeated Clemson in the COMCAST BROUGHT TO YOU BY BUDLIGHT, POWERED BY AT&T NATTY BOWL, PRESENTED BY MONSANTO.

    That's pretty much the system we have now, dumbass.
    Except for the fact that we have the over-complication of not knowing where the fuck conference champions are going to play and fucking up the traditional bowl tie ins, dumbass.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    I can't, for the life of me figure out why we try to pick 4 teams before the bowls instead of 2 teams after the bowls. It's so fucking stupid.

    Bowl tie ins that would make sense:

    Rose: Pac-12 vs. Big 10 (UW vs. Michigan)
    Sugar: SEC vs. ACC (Bama vs. Clemson)
    Orange: Big 12 vs. At Large 1 (Okie vs. Ohio State)
    Fiesta: At Large 2 vs. At Large 3 (Louisville vs. Western Mich - fuck it)

    Then you have an undefeated UW vs. an undefeated Clemson in the COMCAST BROUGHT TO YOU BY BUDLIGHT, POWERED BY AT&T NATTY BOWL, PRESENTED BY MONSANTO.

    That's pretty much the system we have now, dumbass.
    Except for the fact that we have the over-complication of not knowing where the fuck conference champions are going to play and fucking up the traditional bowl tie ins, dumbass.
    It's very simple to figure out the new system.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • The_Undertaker
    The_Undertaker Member Posts: 521
    PurpleJ said:

    The quest for an undisputed champ is ruining college football. Get the fuck off my lawn!

    I tend to agree with that. Also it seems like people can't even enjoy winning their conference anymore. That should be the real goal of every team every season. Let the rest play itself out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    The whole thing is fucking retarded. You are never going to get a true national champ in CFB. It's ruining fucking everything like my future husband @PurpleJ said.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    The whole thing is fucking retarded. You are never going to get a true national champ in CFB. It's ruining fucking everything like my future husband @PurpleJ said.

    Alabama was a true champion last year.

    Fuck off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,771
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    The whole thing is fucking retarded. You are never going to get a true national champ in CFB. It's ruining fucking everything like my future husband @PurpleJ said.

    Alabama was a true champion last year.

    Fuck off.
    They won the Sugar Bowl.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,500 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2016
    A motion from the floor:

    Whenever a thread contains the word "hot", a Keely/Antje-like pic is required or the thread author is banned.

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    edited November 2016
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    The whole thing is fucking retarded. You are never going to get a true national champ in CFB. It's ruining fucking everything like my future husband @PurpleJ said.

    Alabama was a true champion last year.

    Fuck off.
    FUCKING WRONG.

    You are really bad at understanding shit.

    Clemson and Bama tied last year and split the natty. If you want the fucking NFL, watch the NFL.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter