Rondeau post game comment
Comments
-
Okay fren. Who's better? And you have no idea, because he's never had to do that. Arizona he had a kind of similar game. But our running game went crazy and he managed the game well. Made some nice throws down the stretch. The kid has some improvements to make to become Zeus and shit, but he has so many mad skills its crazy.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself. -
An 8-0 start means you can and should raise your expectations for the year. Jake wasn't very good outside of the two early tds. It really shouldn't be controversial to say that.
-
He wasn't his best today, but I would still take him over any QB in the conference.
-
His 3rd quarter TD to put UW back in the lead you mean?doogsinparadise said:An 8-0 start means you can and should raise your expectations for the year. Jake wasn't very good outside of the two early tds. It really shouldn't be controversial to say that.
-
He's in the top three in the State of Washington.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
Haven't seen CWU play. -
How are the WWU and Whitman QBs looking this year?PurpleThrobber said:
He's in the top three in the State of Washington.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
Haven't seen CWU play. -
Everyone likely gets beat by Bama but I think we hang with anyone else.PurpleJ said:Utah kept in the game with timely throws and a good running game. Our QB was better and we ran the ball well. Should have won by more, but we won.
Bama is the #1 team in the land with a true frosh at QB. It doesn't matter if you can run it and play good (they are great, but we are pretty good on D) defense and special teams.
We aren't quite there yet with our front 7. It showed against a real line today. I don't think we can win in the playoffs if we get there. People will hate me for pointing this out, but I am impressed with the improvement this year.
Thank koop for his service in getting a decent post out of this fucktard. I like my Noles tonight. The ACC is my favorite conference this year.
Enjoy the ride and hopefully we can keep it respectable in the playoffs. Everyone on the west coast will want to be a Dawg.
Shit Michigan struggled with Colorado at home!
Not going to win every game by 21 although take away the bs roughing and the dumbshit unsportsman and we get close. -
Darnold. maybe falkkoopdog said:
Okay fren. Who's better? And you have no idea, because he's never had to do that. Arizona he had a kind of similar game. But our running game went crazy and he managed the game well. Made some nice throws down the stretch. The kid has some improvements to make to become Zeus and shit, but he has so many mad skills its crazy.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself. -
"Tunnel of Love" is an interesting album. It's kind of a time capsule because it has a very distinct 80s synth sound that was made completely obsolete a few years later. It sounds like 80s pop trash but if you dig into it it's actually a rather dark album. I always considered it a bizarro-world successor to Nebraska - an album that stands out from the rest of his cstalogue, both sonically and lyrically.koopdog said:
I'm a fan. But you're wrong here. Kinda like when Bruce Springsteen did the whole "Tunnel of Love" shit.doogsinparadise said:
He's the fourth best qb in the conference.dnc said:Browning's worst game of the season and he completed 60% of his passes for 9.5 yards per attempt, two scores and a pick.
He wasn't at his best but he wasn't close to bad.
He's the best QB we've had since Tui and the best QB in the nation who doesn't play in the ACC.
He sucks.
I'm drunk -
@koopdogPurpleThrobber said:
He's in the top three in the State of Washington.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
Haven't seen CWU play.
Put UW in the Louisville Clemson game and tell me that Browning makes the plays that Watson and Jackson made to keep their teams in the game.
I would even take Falk over him. Probably Darnold, despite the turnovers. -
As shitty as this post is, I love you for it. He hated his wife. That is as deep as it gets.bananasnblondes said:
"Tunnel of Love" is an interesting album. It's kind of a time capsule because it has a very distinct 80s synth sound that was made completely obsolete a few years later. It sounds like 80s pop trash but if you dig into it it's actually a rather dark album. I always considered it a bizarro-world successor to Nebraska - an album that stands out from the rest of his cstalogue, both sonically and lyrically.koopdog said:
I'm a fan. But you're wrong here. Kinda like when Bruce Springsteen did the whole "Tunnel of Love" shit.doogsinparadise said:
He's the fourth best qb in the conference.dnc said:Browning's worst game of the season and he completed 60% of his passes for 9.5 yards per attempt, two scores and a pick.
He wasn't at his best but he wasn't close to bad.
He's the best QB we've had since Tui and the best QB in the nation who doesn't play in the ACC.
He sucks.
I'm drunk
-
Not so fast. He has mad weapons and a good offensive line.koopdog said:
Okay fren. Who's better? And you have no idea, because he's never had to do that. Arizona he had a kind of similar game. But our running game went crazy and he managed the game well. Made some nice throws down the stretch. The kid has some improvements to make to become Zeus and shit, but he has so many mad skills its crazy.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
He's a limp arm film nerd who's been pretty good so far. Playoff/Natty material? Not. Rosebowl worthy. Yep. -
Thanks for elaborating, this is pretty much how I feel about his ceiling.Baseman said:
Not so fast. He has mad weapons and a good offensive line.koopdog said:
Okay fren. Who's better? And you have no idea, because he's never had to do that. Arizona he had a kind of similar game. But our running game went crazy and he managed the game well. Made some nice throws down the stretch. The kid has some improvements to make to become Zeus and shit, but he has so many mad skills its crazy.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
He's a limp arm film nerd who's been pretty good so far. Playoff/Natty material? Not. Rosebowl worthy. Yep. -
Brother, I don't know, because he hasn't been put in that position yet. I think he's really, really, really good. I'll go with Browning. Look at the quantum leap in his development since last year. Next year? We'll see. We are a year ahead of what I thought would happen.doogsinparadise said:
@koopdogPurpleThrobber said:
He's in the top three in the State of Washington.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
Haven't seen CWU play.
Put UW in the Louisville Clemson game and tell me that Browning makes the plays that Watson and Jackson made to keep their teams in the game.
I would even take Falk over him. Probably Darnold, despite the turnovers. -
8-0
4th in the cuntry
Two wins on the road when previous versions of the Huskies would have folded their tent.
I don't give a fuck if a grandma pushing a walker and wearing a pink tutu is QB.
Just win. -
Better hope Browning takes a bigger leap next year after John Boy, Butta, Qualls, Jones, and Sid MF Jones LEAVEkoopdog said:
Brother, I don't know, because he hasn't been put in that position yet. I think he's really, really, really good. I'll go with Browning. Look at the quantum leap in his development since last year. Next year? We'll see. We are a year ahead of what I thought would happen.doogsinparadise said:
@koopdogPurpleThrobber said:
He's in the top three in the State of Washington.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
Haven't seen CWU play.
Put UW in the Louisville Clemson game and tell me that Browning makes the plays that Watson and Jackson made to keep their teams in the game.
I would even take Falk over him. Probably Darnold, despite the turnovers. -
We must not be watching the same game. He's alright, certainly in the top 15 in the country. But elite? Idk man.koopdog said:
Brother, I don't know, because he hasn't been put in that position yet. I think he's really, really, really good. I'll go with Browning. Look at the quantum leap in his development since last year. Next year? We'll see. We are a year ahead of what I thought would happen.doogsinparadise said:
@koopdogPurpleThrobber said:
He's in the top three in the State of Washington.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
Haven't seen CWU play.
Put UW in the Louisville Clemson game and tell me that Browning makes the plays that Watson and Jackson made to keep their teams in the game.
I would even take Falk over him. Probably Darnold, despite the turnovers. -
I guess Darnold is pretty good. I haven't seen him much but I heard and watched a little of the AZ-USC gayme. Falk is obvioiusly good but he's a system qb. People said BJ Simmons and @KkkliffKkklingsbury were good (also Leach QB's) too. Browning is definitely an all-Pac 12 contender right now though.
-
Chinsightful. TW, by virtue of today, is a PAC-12 contender too.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I guess Darnold is pretty good. I haven't seen him much but I heard and watched a little of the AZ-USC gayme. Falk is obvioiusly good but he's a system qb. People said BJ Simmons and @KkkliffKkklingsbury were good (also Leach QB's) too. Browning is definitely an all-Pac 12 contender right now though.
-
Where in theeeeee fuck is this limp arm thing coming from? It's bullfuckingshitontoast. He's been throwing dimes this year. Yes, of course in a sample size he's fucked off a few passes. But he has a solid arm and his long ball, which they worked on in the scrimmages like I predicted, has been ridiculously better. This is a fucking myth that needs to die. He has needled it at times. It's not 100% but his completion rate and his ability to fucking kill it is amazing. Especially his ability to throw on the scramble.Baseman said:
Not so fast. He has mad weapons and a good offensive line.koopdog said:
Okay fren. Who's better? And you have no idea, because he's never had to do that. Arizona he had a kind of similar game. But our running game went crazy and he managed the game well. Made some nice throws down the stretch. The kid has some improvements to make to become Zeus and shit, but he has so many mad skills its crazy.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
He's a limp arm film nerd who's been pretty good so far. Playoff/Natty material? Not. Rosebowl worthy. Yep.
Yes, I want to fuck him apparently, but I'm right. -
Browning is a system qb.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I guess Darnold is pretty good. I haven't seen him much but I heard and watched a little of the AZ-USC gayme. Falk is obvioiusly good but he's a system qb. People said BJ Simmons and @KkkliffKkklingsbury were good (also Leach QB's) too. Browning is definitely an all-Pac 12 contender right now though.
-
I honestly believe if he's not now, he will be. His development is off the charts. Put that together with his competitive streak and his accuracy which is empirical, and his ability to evade the pocket rush.....yes. And his ability to look off the defense. A true Sophomore. I'm a doog for him like I was for Peterman. I get that. But I'm right.doogsinparadise said:
We must not be watching the same game. He's alright, certainly in the top 15 in the country. But elite? Idk man.koopdog said:
Brother, I don't know, because he hasn't been put in that position yet. I think he's really, really, really good. I'll go with Browning. Look at the quantum leap in his development since last year. Next year? We'll see. We are a year ahead of what I thought would happen.doogsinparadise said:
@koopdogPurpleThrobber said:
He's in the top three in the State of Washington.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
Haven't seen CWU play.
Put UW in the Louisville Clemson game and tell me that Browning makes the plays that Watson and Jackson made to keep their teams in the game.
I would even take Falk over him. Probably Darnold, despite the turnovers.
-
What's been empirically proven this year is that the team does better when Jake doesn't have to throw more than 20-22 times per game. That's not the mark of a transcendent qb. His interception today happened because he stared down his receiver, and he's still shitting his pants against the blitz.koopdog said:
I honestly believe if he's not now, he will be. His development is off the charts. Put that together with his competitive streak and his accuracy which is empirical, and his ability to evade the pocket rush.....yes. And his ability to look off the defense. A true Sophomore. I'm a doog for him like I was for Peterman. I get that. But I'm right.doogsinparadise said:
We must not be watching the same game. He's alright, certainly in the top 15 in the country. But elite? Idk man.koopdog said:
Brother, I don't know, because he hasn't been put in that position yet. I think he's really, really, really good. I'll go with Browning. Look at the quantum leap in his development since last year. Next year? We'll see. We are a year ahead of what I thought would happen.doogsinparadise said:
@koopdogPurpleThrobber said:
He's in the top three in the State of Washington.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
Haven't seen CWU play.
Put UW in the Louisville Clemson game and tell me that Browning makes the plays that Watson and Jackson made to keep their teams in the game.
I would even take Falk over him. Probably Darnold, despite the turnovers.
I get that it's exciting to have an above average qb after 15 years, but slow the man crushage down a little bit. -
Disagree.koopdog said:
Where in theeeeee fuck is this limp arm thing coming from? It's bullfuckingshitontoast. He's been throwing dimes this year. Yes, of course in a sample size he's fucked off a few passes. But he has a solid arm and his long ball, which they worked on in the scrimmages like I predicted, has been ridiculously better. This is a fucking myth that needs to die. He has needled it at times. It's not 100% but his completion rate and his ability to fucking kill it is amazing. Especially his ability to throw on the scramble.Baseman said:
Not so fast. He has mad weapons and a good offensive line.koopdog said:
Okay fren. Who's better? And you have no idea, because he's never had to do that. Arizona he had a kind of similar game. But our running game went crazy and he managed the game well. Made some nice throws down the stretch. The kid has some improvements to make to become Zeus and shit, but he has so many mad skills its crazy.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
He's a limp arm film nerd who's been pretty good so far. Playoff/Natty material? Not. Rosebowl worthy. Yep.
Yes, I want to fuck him apparently, but I'm right.
He is what he is - a pretty good, maybe the best PAC-12 QB. ACC/SEC? Not so much. -
Trollolololodoogsinparadise said:
Browning is a system qb.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I guess Darnold is pretty good. I haven't seen him much but I heard and watched a little of the AZ-USC gayme. Falk is obvioiusly good but he's a system qb. People said BJ Simmons and @KkkliffKkklingsbury were good (also Leach QB's) too. Browning is definitely an all-Pac 12 contender right now though.
-
SEC?Baseman said:He is what he is - a pretty good, maybe the best PAC-12 QB. ACC/SEC? Not so much.
-
That's what she said.koopdog said:
As shitty as this post is, I love you for it. He hated his wife. That is as deep as it gets.bananasnblondes said:
"Tunnel of Love" is an interesting album. It's kind of a time capsule because it has a very distinct 80s synth sound that was made completely obsolete a few years later. It sounds like 80s pop trash but if you dig into it it's actually a rather dark album. I always considered it a bizarro-world successor to Nebraska - an album that stands out from the rest of his cstalogue, both sonically and lyrically.koopdog said:
I'm a fan. But you're wrong here. Kinda like when Bruce Springsteen did the whole "Tunnel of Love" shit.doogsinparadise said:
He's the fourth best qb in the conference.dnc said:Browning's worst game of the season and he completed 60% of his passes for 9.5 yards per attempt, two scores and a pick.
He wasn't at his best but he wasn't close to bad.
He's the best QB we've had since Tui and the best QB in the nation who doesn't play in the ACC.
He sucks.
I'm drunk -
You're such a faggot who hates pre snap Jesus.doogsinparadise said:
@koopdogPurpleThrobber said:
He's in the top three in the State of Washington.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
Haven't seen CWU play.
Put UW in the Louisville Clemson game and tell me that Browning makes the plays that Watson and Jackson made to keep their teams in the game.
I would even take Falk over him. Probably Darnold, despite the turnovers.
How simplistic your analysis is. Back to doog man with you. -
Darnold lol.... He will get exposed when he plays a decent defensedhdawg said:
Darnold. maybe falkkoopdog said:
Okay fren. Who's better? And you have no idea, because he's never had to do that. Arizona he had a kind of similar game. But our running game went crazy and he managed the game well. Made some nice throws down the stretch. The kid has some improvements to make to become Zeus and shit, but he has so many mad skills its crazy.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself. -
I like film nerds generally those guys are pretty good.Baseman said:
Not so fast. He has mad weapons and a good offensive line.koopdog said:
Okay fren. Who's better? And you have no idea, because he's never had to do that. Arizona he had a kind of similar game. But our running game went crazy and he managed the game well. Made some nice throws down the stretch. The kid has some improvements to make to become Zeus and shit, but he has so many mad skills its crazy.doogsinparadise said:Ok, fine. Top three
But I have a hard time saying he's the best qb in the conference when he struggles with the blitz against a mediocre Utah squad. That was a pretty bad pick, and unlike some of the other guys he doesn't have the ability to will the team to a win by himself.
He's a limp arm film nerd who's been pretty good so far. Playoff/Natty material? Not. Rosebowl worthy. Yep.
