Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pete lauds his OL Coach.

Passion
Passion Member Posts: 4,622
edited October 2016 in Hardcore Husky Board
Pretty high praise for Strausser at the 23:05 mark: seattletimes.com/sports/uw-husky-football/uws-chris-petersen-on-jake-brownings-heisman-hopes-oregon-pete-carroll-bye-week-and-more/

In answering the questions, Pete was obviously directing his comments toward some specific people.
«1

Comments

  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited October 2016

    Pretty sure that was directed at Fozzy.

    Ya think?
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Also, I think we need to include a trigger warning for the pussies of @RoadDawg55 and others that have struggled to adjust to the idea that football and recruiting sometimes overlap.
  • AIRWOLF
    AIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    dnc said:

    Yeah but assistants recruit areas, not what they coach. Isn't that recruiting 101? Pete is the closer. Stausser or whatever (if we win the natty I'll learn their names) has coached up some bags of shit. If we want better recruits the whole staff and the closer have to do it

    I thought that was the case too, but it seems like every DB recruit we've gotten has been Jimmy Lake's responsibility, and likewise with other recruits (Hamdan comes in and all of a sudden we can recruit WR's).

    It seems the position coach has more to do with positional recruiting in Pete's program than the traditional college model.

    Or maybe it's classic confirmation bias?
    The regional model is definitely what we heard about under Sark, mainly as it related to fucking disasters (instate whiffs being due to Cox, Cozzeto didn't bring in OLs, but maybe helped get a couple AZ kids). Maybe it was true, maybe it was BS, but they were disasters either way.

    The difference now is that I am going to be legitimately shocked by any disasters.
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    I tend to agree with road dawg espcially at the college level. A guy like Nick Harris who is super athletic is at an advantage over a lesser athlete of course. Which makes him have a higher ceiling and easier to coach based on that fact. So if they can get over looked athletic as hell guys, watch out because they can coach. Some of these higher rated kids are so unathletic but they are rated highly because they are huge. I think being a good OL is more important than being a "great recruiter". You recruit based on special attributes and coach them up from there, not on stars.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,760 Founders Club
    Thanks DAWG fan
  • Purple_Pills
    Purple_Pills Member Posts: 2,110
    AIRWOLF said:

    The regional model is definitely what we heard about under Sark, mainly as it related to fucking disasters (instate whiffs being due to Cox, Cozzeto didn't bring in OLs, but maybe helped get a couple AZ kids). Maybe it was true, maybe it was BS, but they were disasters either way.

    The difference now is that I am going to be legitimately shocked by any disasters.

    Washington used the regional model back to James if not earlier. Coaches would focus on particular areas so they could build relationships with the high school coaches in those areas. The closer assistant (Bobby Hauck under Nuehiesel for example) or head coach would step when needed and become primary contact.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,035 Standard Supporter
    FYI: There's a lot of creepy-pedo phrasing in this thread. Huge, super-athletic, kids, 3 deep...

    Oy Vey.
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,508
    I'm pretty sure our coaches are still assigned to regions. The position coaches still play an equal role though.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    I'm pretty sure our coaches are still assigned to regions. The position coaches still play an equal role though.

    Duh.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    I need to see some beef that doesn't look like they're in the Aryan Brotherhood.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    Yeah but assistants recruit areas, not what they coach. Isn't that recruiting 101? Pete is the closer. Stausser or whatever (if we win the natty I'll learn their names) has coached up some bags of shit. If we want better recruits the whole staff and the closer have to do it

    Disagree.

    In the social media age 'territories' have become secondary. People primarily recruit the kids at their position. Straußer has been horrible at it. It's nice that he's coached up kids, but they aren't POSes. Adams and McGary were top 300 kids, Eldrenkamp was talented and Coleman Shelton is only okay.

    Further, we only have 2 deep in the line right now because of bizarre recruiting strategies and failings. I prefer to be AT LEAST 3 deep at every position.

    If we had 2 line injuries for one game, we would be playing walk-ons or people who are god awful.
    Everyone here wants a 5 star in state tackle.

    If we had two injuries at any position we would be playing some bums. I would rather have any two OL hurt (even Adams and McGary) than Qualls and Gaines... Or Victor and Bierria. Or probably even Ross and Pettis.

    I bitched about Garnett and Banner because the team and OL sucked. The team is undefefeated and the OL is doing well now. Pete is taking a helicopter to the kid's game. He has an undefeated team. If Sarrell doesn't want to come here, fuck him.

    I would rather have a coach like Strausser who is getting results than Klemm. Bitching about the OL coach of the best OL we have had in years is fucking stupid.
    AGAIN - why the fuck would I want a coach that can recruit but can't coach?

    Here's a novel fucking idea: I WANT A COACH THAT CAN DO BOTH!!! WHOA!?!?!?

    Arguing that 'whoever we get is going to be fine' is dumb. Our OL right now is great because we have two highly rated kids as tackles and a really good 'lifeblood' type player in Eldrenkamp.

    We need coaches at ALL positions that can coach and recruit. This is just low standards doog bullshit.
  • KobeStan
    KobeStan Member Posts: 91
    edited October 2016
    dnc said:

    Yeah but assistants recruit areas, not what they coach. Isn't that recruiting 101? Pete is the closer. Stausser or whatever (if we win the natty I'll learn their names) has coached up some bags of shit. If we want better recruits the whole staff and the closer have to do it

    I thought that was the case too, but it seems like every DB recruit we've gotten has been Jimmy Lake's responsibility, and likewise with other recruits (Hamdan comes in and all of a sudden we can recruit WR's).

    It seems the position coach has more to do with positional recruiting in Pete's program than the traditional college model.

    Or maybe it's classic confirmation bias?
    Its still assigned by region. Unless you're a Texas team(in which case like 90% of your team comes from in-state) recruiting by position is incredibly inefficient.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    KobeStan said:

    dnc said:

    Yeah but assistants recruit areas, not what they coach. Isn't that recruiting 101? Pete is the closer. Stausser or whatever (if we win the natty I'll learn their names) has coached up some bags of shit. If we want better recruits the whole staff and the closer have to do it

    I thought that was the case too, but it seems like every DB recruit we've gotten has been Jimmy Lake's responsibility, and likewise with other recruits (Hamdan comes in and all of a sudden we can recruit WR's).

    It seems the position coach has more to do with positional recruiting in Pete's program than the traditional college model.

    Or maybe it's classic confirmation bias?
    Its still assigned by region. Unless you're a Texas team(in which case like 90% of your team comes from in-state) recruiting by position is incredibly inefficient.
    Get a fucking avatar or LEAVE!