I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?
And losers blame the refs.
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
You state that like Lester wanted Trump to lose. Get it yet?
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?
And losers blame the refs.
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMO
The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?
And losers blame the refs.
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?
And losers blame the refs.
I told you he was the whitest black guy alive.
Going racist is exactly what is expected from Troomps. Nice work filling the stereotype.
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?
And losers blame the refs.
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?
And losers blame the refs.
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMO
The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.
Your team is shit. Don't blame the refs troomps.
I'm giving intelligent analysis. Not surprised it is over your head
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?
And losers blame the refs.
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMO
The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.
I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.
For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.
Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?
And losers blame the refs.
That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMO
The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves
Holt was pretty non-existent if anything and let trump interrupt at will. He asked about emails early. He threw an alley oop to trump on cyber security that Trump whiffed completely.
Your team is shit. Don't blame the refs troomps.
I'm giving intelligent analysis.
Disagree.
You're blaming the refs. Every thread. Sad!
Simple thoughts from a simple mind. Sad to see how far a UCLA education has fallen
I love the racism accusations from 1974. Wasn't everyone racist as fuck back then? Yet, race relations were actually better, because people were more open and honest about it than today, so shit actually got done and progress actually happened. I guarantee N-word jokes got big laughs at Bill and Hill's Arkansas Mansion back in the 1970's, but now Hill's all down with the AA peeps. Yeah, right.
I love the racism accusations from 1974. Wasn't everyone racist as fuck back then? Yet, race relations were actually better, because people were more open and honest about it than today, so shit actually got done and progress actually happened. I guarantee N-word jokes got big laughs at Bill and Hill's Arkansas Mansion back in the 1970's, but now Hill's all down with the AA peeps. Yeah, right.
The greatest contribution Trump has made in this campaign is that he has shown how racist everyone still is.
It never went away. He just made people feel comfortable about expressing their racism again.
I love the racism accusations from 1974. Wasn't everyone racist as fuck back then? Yet, race relations were actually better, because people were more open and honest about it than today, so shit actually got done and progress actually happened. I guarantee N-word jokes got big laughs at Bill and Hill's Arkansas Mansion back in the 1970's, but now Hill's all down with the AA peeps. Yeah, right.
The greatest contribution Trump has made in this campaign is that he has shown how racist everyone still is.
It never went away. He just made people feel comfortable about expressing their racism again.
Welcome to Oregon
And great racial healing of America by Obama as always. I blame Trump
Comments
Your team is shit. Don't blame the refs troomps.
You're blaming the refs. Every thread. Sad!
It never went away. He just made people feel comfortable about expressing their racism again.
And great racial healing of America by Obama as always. I blame Trump
Great point, Boobs!
Great state. Lots of mighty fine white folks there