Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Who won the FIRST!!! debate?

1246710

Comments

  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,572
    TRUMP
    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    J?

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    There's that loser talk again.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,869 Founders Club
    J?
    I like Trump in the second debate because the next moderator will have to get on Hills the way Holt went after Trump

    Plus Donald will do a lot better getting after her himself.

    President Trump

    Deal with it loosers
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    TRUMP

    I was busy waiting tables at my night job. A "job" is this thing that you go to where you accomplish tasks as efficiently as you can in exchange for money, in case any of you Clinton supporters are confused.

    You should have earned a useful college degree.
    I have a degree in internet message board posting. It's been chincredibly useful. See?
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    CLITON

    I like Trump in the second debate because the next moderator will have to get on Hills the way Holt went after Trump

    Plus Donald will do a lot better getting after her himself.

    President Trump

    Deal with it loosers

    Great blame the refs post as always!

    Hopefully next time a question is brought up about cyber security, Trump will remember to talk about personal email servers and less about Rosie O'Donnell.

    Losers lose.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,869 Founders Club
    J?

    I like Trump in the second debate because the next moderator will have to get on Hills the way Holt went after Trump

    Plus Donald will do a lot better getting after her himself.

    President Trump

    Deal with it loosers

    Great blame the refs post as always!

    Hopefully next time a question is brought up about cyber security, Trump will remember to talk about personal email servers and less about Rosie O'Donnell.

    Losers lose.
    Good point. Classy post
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    I like Trump in the second debate because the next moderator will have to get on Hills the way Holt went after Trump

    Plus Donald will do a lot better getting after her himself.

    President Trump

    Deal with it loosers

    Trump has a much better chance to win the second debate given he won't be on stage.

    HTH
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,572
    TRUMP
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
    In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,869 Founders Club
    J?

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    I agree with this. If the bars were equal Hillary wins, but Trumps bar was so low, the fact that he looked human and didn't use a "little marco" remark made him the winner at the polls. I'm not saying it's right, it's just how it is.

    For the record, by getting in a pissing match with Trump, Lester Holt just gave a Trump an unneeded narrative. A moderator's job isn't to be correcting candidates. That's the other candidate's job. It just adds to the narrative that the liberal media is all in for Hillary. Also being a minority and using the racial profiling line about Trumps frisk policy more than likely ticked off the silent majority. Especially, given the sensitivity of the Kaepernick protests which 75% of Americans disagree with. It's just not a good look. It will hurt Lester's ratings going forward, and helped Trump in the process.

    Hillary won the debate but Trump won at the polls so technically Trump won. So there you go.
    You do know that Lester is a registered Republican, right?

    And losers blame the refs.
    That doesn't mean anything. George Bush Sr is a registered republican. To think being a registered member of a party means what it once did for this campaign is naive.
    So you are blaming the refs for Trump looking like a douche? Got it.
    In my TLDR post I mentioned that Lester actually helped Trump by pushing the media narrative. You might want to reread that part.
    Holt played his role as an establishment stooge perfectly. Helps Trump IMO

    The leftard lemmings here can't even admit a basic truth that Holt was biased as shit so they start the doog stuff. It's embarrassing how bad these posters are. They should kill themselves