If Sark lays a dud (likely) on Saturday and we lose to ASU...
Comments
-
pac12 still 1-2 conference in country up top and in depth. Utah almost beat UcLA and did the Tree. I never backtrack bitchTheKobeStopper said:
Lol. There's one good team in this conference. But your AuburnDoog backtrack excuse making impression is top notch.puppylove_sugarsteel said:this game is bigger than the Oregon game. Its the difference between 10-2 and 7-6. Unfair matchups though. This conference is unfair. Alabama and LSU would be 4-2 with UW's schedule. The difference? Banner and Miles would at least make as game @ASU. Sark better lose by no more than 3-7
-
The Pac-12 has only one good team maybe two with UCLA.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
pac12 still 1-2 conference in country up top and in depth. Utah almost beat UcLA and did the Tree. I never backtrack bitchTheKobeStopper said:
Lol. There's one good team in this conference. But your AuburnDoog backtrack excuse making impression is top notch.puppylove_sugarsteel said:this game is bigger than the Oregon game. Its the difference between 10-2 and 7-6. Unfair matchups though. This conference is unfair. Alabama and LSU would be 4-2 with UW's schedule. The difference? Banner and Miles would at least make as game @ASU. Sark better lose by no more than 3-7
-
It very well may be wishful thinking, but I really do believe he will be fired if he goes 7-6. It seems crazy to think he would survive a fourth consecutive year of that especially when you watch this team and see 10 win talent.DugtheDoog said:
Roaddawg, what makes you think this? There's a huge difference between should and will. With an AD that cares about winning, 4 straight 7-6 seasons gets you fired. But what makes you think woody all of a sudden has an about-face after sucking sark's cock for 5 years? If this is just wishful thinking from you, I'm right there with you.RoadDawg55 said:Sark won't survive if he loses this game. Both UCLA and Oregon State are better. This is the easiest road game left. Another 7-6 and Sark will be fired. I know many on this board think otherwise, but he is not surviving a 4th consecutive season of 7-6, which is what will happen if he loses this game.
-
agreedRoadDawg55 said:
It very well may be wishful thinking, but I really do believe he will be fired if he goes 7-6. It seems crazy to think he would survive a fourth consecutive year of that especially when you watch this team and see 10 win talent.DugtheDoog said:
Roaddawg, what makes you think this? There's a huge difference between should and will. With an AD that cares about winning, 4 straight 7-6 seasons gets you fired. But what makes you think woody all of a sudden has an about-face after sucking sark's cock for 5 years? If this is just wishful thinking from you, I'm right there with you.RoadDawg55 said:Sark won't survive if he loses this game. Both UCLA and Oregon State are better. This is the easiest road game left. Another 7-6 and Sark will be fired. I know many on this board think otherwise, but he is not surviving a 4th consecutive season of 7-6, which is what will happen if he loses this game.
I think the boosters start to get really pissed. It's probably more of a 60 / 40 thing.
-
What is, "he needs more time"!
-
I believe it's located in the Turkish Consulate.monroecougdad said:
Are there any Armenian NFL stars that will write a letter to President Young compelling Sark to be extended? Is there a Seattle chapter of the NAAAP that will intervene on Corky's behalf?RaceBannon said:Sark isn't getting fired for 7-6
-
It will come down to butts in the seats. Lose at ASU and the Cal game is sparsely attended. Sark will start to be in trouble no matter what is said publicly. If there is still decent attendance and we go 7-6, it will not matter and it will be about the journey.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
agreedRoadDawg55 said:
It very well may be wishful thinking, but I really do believe he will be fired if he goes 7-6. It seems crazy to think he would survive a fourth consecutive year of that especially when you watch this team and see 10 win talent.DugtheDoog said:
Roaddawg, what makes you think this? There's a huge difference between should and will. With an AD that cares about winning, 4 straight 7-6 seasons gets you fired. But what makes you think woody all of a sudden has an about-face after sucking sark's cock for 5 years? If this is just wishful thinking from you, I'm right there with you.RoadDawg55 said:Sark won't survive if he loses this game. Both UCLA and Oregon State are better. This is the easiest road game left. Another 7-6 and Sark will be fired. I know many on this board think otherwise, but he is not surviving a 4th consecutive season of 7-6, which is what will happen if he loses this game.
I think the boosters start to get really pissed. It's probably more of a 60 / 40 thing. -
Looks like you just need more time to get aclimated to this place.JECAR said:What is, "he needs more time"!
-
Even if he goes 7-6, Sark will be bailed out by the same excuse used to bail out his teams year after year: he's young.
We'd hate to be Sark's training ground for a new job and then have him go somewhere else and win a natty or five. So we'd better hang on to him and reap the benefits of our patience. 2018 will be special, for real this time. -
Yup you don't want to fire Rich Brooks too soon. We need the 17 year plan to lose the Rose Bowl.DeLarry said:Even if he goes 7-6, Sark will be bailed out by the same excuse used to bail out his teams year after year: he's young.
We'd hate to be Sark's training ground for a new job and then have him go somewhere else and win a natty or five. So we'd better hang on to him and reap the benefits of our patience. 2018 will be special, for real this time.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
