If Sark lays a dud (likely) on Saturday and we lose to ASU...
Comments
-
Jood remember was the beat writer for Oregon so I'm sure he was fully aware of the Doogs before he took this job.unfrozencaveman said:That's why I stopped posting on ST while back. Tired of going head to head with some of those homers w/ 3,000 posts.
I saw someone posted a link to HH today, and one of those retards went off the deep end. Funny enough, I think Jood is well aware of the situation.
Having this job and seeing first hand the difference in the two programs he is more likely see our side of things.
I think deep down inside Condooga especially towards the end(why he bailed) knows we are right about Sark. -
That's a given but I was asking when does the TUFF schedule argument ever fucking end?! Not making excuses for Lambright but he truly had a TUFF schedule yet I never heard that brought up as an excuse.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The excuses for Sark end the day after he's fired. Coincidentally, these same Doogs will tell us they knew Sark was the wrong guy all along.He_Needs_More_Time said:mhawkeye
Redondo, WA
681 comments
October 15, 2013 at 8:17 AMRating: You must be signed in to rate this post. (7) You must be signed in to rate this post. (0) Log in to
report abuse
Larry makes a great point about the schedule -- something I've noticed but haven't heard any comments about. In essence, the Husky schedule is unfriendly, in that most of the pivotal games are on the road. Here's what I mean: (looking at schedule in August)
Swing games (pivotal): BSU, Arizona, ASU, UCLA, OSU
Likely wins: Illinois, Idaho St., Cal, Colo, WSU
Likely losses: Stan, Ore
Ideally, you'd like to see the pivotal games at home and the likely wins on the road. Unfortunately, the Dawgs have 3/5 of their pivotal games on the road and 5/6 of their likely wins at home.
To win 9 games, they have to "hold serve" on all their "likely win" games and win 3 of the 5 pivotal games. All three of the remaining pivotal games are on the road. They beat BSU and Ariz at home, so they'll need to win 2/3 vs. ASU, UCLA and OSU all on the road to have a chance to reach 9 wins.
So, from a "home and away" standpoint, the remaining schedule is a tough one. The ASU game is huge.
Judging by the comments and every comment that is critical of Sark receiving a ton of thumb downs and doog 101 posts like this have 7 thumbs up and zero thumbs down our fan base has learned nothing.
Again with the blaming of the conference schedule?!! Jesus Christ when do these excuses ever fucking end?!
This is why Washington is dead. Fans like these fucks put zero pressure and in fact support this bullshit program. So there is no sudden rush to change anything. To upper campus everything is going just great.
LRR
I remember the TUFF schedule argument started to come up during the Ty years and it's been going on ever since. -
You know we are in trouble when an ST columnist opens with:unfrozencaveman said:Larry Stone took a stab at it today, but his words are fairly well couched. Still, its progress
http://seattletimes.com/html/larrystone/2022044273_stone15xml.html
"The Huskies can save those illusions of grandeur for next season. "
Grandeur next season? Try next millennium. -
The Kardashian family will be outraged that Armenian's aren't getting a fair shake in this country!monroecougdad said:
Are there any Armenian NFL stars that will write a letter to President Young compelling Sark to be extended? Is there a Seattle chapter of the NAAAP that will intervene on Corky's behalf?RaceBannon said:Sark isn't getting fired for 7-6
-
The TUFF schedule argument ends when UW and WSU join their brothers in the Big Sky.He_Needs_More_Time said:
That's a given but I was asking when does the TUFF schedule argument ever fucking end?! Not making excuses for Lambright but he truly had a TUFF schedule yet I never heard that brought up as an excuse.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The excuses for Sark end the day after he's fired. Coincidentally, these same Doogs will tell us they knew Sark was the wrong guy all along.He_Needs_More_Time said:mhawkeye
Redondo, WA
681 comments
October 15, 2013 at 8:17 AMRating: You must be signed in to rate this post. (7) You must be signed in to rate this post. (0) Log in to
report abuse
Larry makes a great point about the schedule -- something I've noticed but haven't heard any comments about. In essence, the Husky schedule is unfriendly, in that most of the pivotal games are on the road. Here's what I mean: (looking at schedule in August)
Swing games (pivotal): BSU, Arizona, ASU, UCLA, OSU
Likely wins: Illinois, Idaho St., Cal, Colo, WSU
Likely losses: Stan, Ore
Ideally, you'd like to see the pivotal games at home and the likely wins on the road. Unfortunately, the Dawgs have 3/5 of their pivotal games on the road and 5/6 of their likely wins at home.
To win 9 games, they have to "hold serve" on all their "likely win" games and win 3 of the 5 pivotal games. All three of the remaining pivotal games are on the road. They beat BSU and Ariz at home, so they'll need to win 2/3 vs. ASU, UCLA and OSU all on the road to have a chance to reach 9 wins.
So, from a "home and away" standpoint, the remaining schedule is a tough one. The ASU game is huge.
Judging by the comments and every comment that is critical of Sark receiving a ton of thumb downs and doog 101 posts like this have 7 thumbs up and zero thumbs down our fan base has learned nothing.
Again with the blaming of the conference schedule?!! Jesus Christ when do these excuses ever fucking end?!
This is why Washington is dead. Fans like these fucks put zero pressure and in fact support this bullshit program. So there is no sudden rush to change anything. To upper campus everything is going just great.
LRR
I remember the TUFF schedule argument started to come up during the Ty years and it's been going on ever since. -
Go Bobcats!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The TUFF schedule argument ends when UW and WSU join their brothers in the Big Sky.He_Needs_More_Time said:
That's a given but I was asking when does the TUFF schedule argument ever fucking end?! Not making excuses for Lambright but he truly had a TUFF schedule yet I never heard that brought up as an excuse.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The excuses for Sark end the day after he's fired. Coincidentally, these same Doogs will tell us they knew Sark was the wrong guy all along.He_Needs_More_Time said:mhawkeye
Redondo, WA
681 comments
October 15, 2013 at 8:17 AMRating: You must be signed in to rate this post. (7) You must be signed in to rate this post. (0) Log in to
report abuse
Larry makes a great point about the schedule -- something I've noticed but haven't heard any comments about. In essence, the Husky schedule is unfriendly, in that most of the pivotal games are on the road. Here's what I mean: (looking at schedule in August)
Swing games (pivotal): BSU, Arizona, ASU, UCLA, OSU
Likely wins: Illinois, Idaho St., Cal, Colo, WSU
Likely losses: Stan, Ore
Ideally, you'd like to see the pivotal games at home and the likely wins on the road. Unfortunately, the Dawgs have 3/5 of their pivotal games on the road and 5/6 of their likely wins at home.
To win 9 games, they have to "hold serve" on all their "likely win" games and win 3 of the 5 pivotal games. All three of the remaining pivotal games are on the road. They beat BSU and Ariz at home, so they'll need to win 2/3 vs. ASU, UCLA and OSU all on the road to have a chance to reach 9 wins.
So, from a "home and away" standpoint, the remaining schedule is a tough one. The ASU game is huge.
Judging by the comments and every comment that is critical of Sark receiving a ton of thumb downs and doog 101 posts like this have 7 thumbs up and zero thumbs down our fan base has learned nothing.
Again with the blaming of the conference schedule?!! Jesus Christ when do these excuses ever fucking end?!
This is why Washington is dead. Fans like these fucks put zero pressure and in fact support this bullshit program. So there is no sudden rush to change anything. To upper campus everything is going just great.
LRR
I remember the TUFF schedule argument started to come up during the Ty years and it's been going on ever since. -
Our Bobcats and Vikings would give those classless motherfuckers some beatdowns.Dick_B said:
Go Bobcats!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The TUFF schedule argument ends when UW and WSU join their brothers in the Big Sky.He_Needs_More_Time said:
That's a given but I was asking when does the TUFF schedule argument ever fucking end?! Not making excuses for Lambright but he truly had a TUFF schedule yet I never heard that brought up as an excuse.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The excuses for Sark end the day after he's fired. Coincidentally, these same Doogs will tell us they knew Sark was the wrong guy all along.He_Needs_More_Time said:mhawkeye
Redondo, WA
681 comments
October 15, 2013 at 8:17 AMRating: You must be signed in to rate this post. (7) You must be signed in to rate this post. (0) Log in to
report abuse
Larry makes a great point about the schedule -- something I've noticed but haven't heard any comments about. In essence, the Husky schedule is unfriendly, in that most of the pivotal games are on the road. Here's what I mean: (looking at schedule in August)
Swing games (pivotal): BSU, Arizona, ASU, UCLA, OSU
Likely wins: Illinois, Idaho St., Cal, Colo, WSU
Likely losses: Stan, Ore
Ideally, you'd like to see the pivotal games at home and the likely wins on the road. Unfortunately, the Dawgs have 3/5 of their pivotal games on the road and 5/6 of their likely wins at home.
To win 9 games, they have to "hold serve" on all their "likely win" games and win 3 of the 5 pivotal games. All three of the remaining pivotal games are on the road. They beat BSU and Ariz at home, so they'll need to win 2/3 vs. ASU, UCLA and OSU all on the road to have a chance to reach 9 wins.
So, from a "home and away" standpoint, the remaining schedule is a tough one. The ASU game is huge.
Judging by the comments and every comment that is critical of Sark receiving a ton of thumb downs and doog 101 posts like this have 7 thumbs up and zero thumbs down our fan base has learned nothing.
Again with the blaming of the conference schedule?!! Jesus Christ when do these excuses ever fucking end?!
This is why Washington is dead. Fans like these fucks put zero pressure and in fact support this bullshit program. So there is no sudden rush to change anything. To upper campus everything is going just great.
LRR
I remember the TUFF schedule argument started to come up during the Ty years and it's been going on ever since.
Simple fact.
-
Roaddawg, what makes you think this? There's a huge difference between should and will. With an AD that cares about winning, 4 straight 7-6 seasons gets you fired. But what makes you think woody all of a sudden has an about-face after sucking sark's cock for 5 years? If this is just wishful thinking from you, I'm right there with you.RoadDawg55 said:Sark won't survive if he loses this game. Both UCLA and Oregon State are better. This is the easiest road game left. Another 7-6 and Sark will be fired. I know many on this board think otherwise, but he is not surviving a 4th consecutive season of 7-6, which is what will happen if he loses this game.
-
After a 4th straight 7-6 season then Sark will be on the "hot seat" and be given "one last chance" to prove himself next year.DugtheDoog said:
Roaddawg, what makes you think this? There's a huge difference between should and will. With an AD that cares about winning, 4 straight 7-6 seasons gets you fired. But what makes you think woody all of a sudden has an about-face after sucking sark's cock for 5 years? If this is just wishful thinking from you, I'm right there with you.RoadDawg55 said:Sark won't survive if he loses this game. Both UCLA and Oregon State are better. This is the easiest road game left. Another 7-6 and Sark will be fired. I know many on this board think otherwise, but he is not surviving a 4th consecutive season of 7-6, which is what will happen if he loses this game.
Lather, Rinse, Repeat. -
Going into a season on the hot seat with no previous record of success is a recipe for disaster. I am not sure the athletic department has learned anything though.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
