If Sark lays a dud (likely) on Saturday and we lose to ASU...
Comments
-
Sark isn't getting fired for 7-6
-
He definitely shouldn't survive another 7-6, but Seattle and the UW are full of pussies.RoadDawg55 said:Sark won't survive if he loses this game. Both UCLA and Oregon State are better. This is the easiest road game left. Another 7-6 and Sark will be fired. I know many on this board think otherwise, but he is not surviving a 4th consecutive season of 7-6, which is what will happen if he loses this game.
-
"We’ve played a good first half of football against some really good teams,’’ he said. “But, just as we’ve been all season long, we’re an excellent second-half football team. And we’re going to go out in the second half and play a great half of the season. And it starts Saturday at Arizona State.’’
I don't think the Huskies have played one good first half against anyone besides the scrimmage against Idaho State so he's wrong there.
Hard to sell the second half when Oregon literally scored on every single drive but the final mercy kneel drive. -
mhawkeye
Redondo, WA
681 comments
October 15, 2013 at 8:17 AMRating: You must be signed in to rate this post. (7) You must be signed in to rate this post. (0) Log in to
report abuse
Larry makes a great point about the schedule -- something I've noticed but haven't heard any comments about. In essence, the Husky schedule is unfriendly, in that most of the pivotal games are on the road. Here's what I mean: (looking at schedule in August)
Swing games (pivotal): BSU, Arizona, ASU, UCLA, OSU
Likely wins: Illinois, Idaho St., Cal, Colo, WSU
Likely losses: Stan, Ore
Ideally, you'd like to see the pivotal games at home and the likely wins on the road. Unfortunately, the Dawgs have 3/5 of their pivotal games on the road and 5/6 of their likely wins at home.
To win 9 games, they have to "hold serve" on all their "likely win" games and win 3 of the 5 pivotal games. All three of the remaining pivotal games are on the road. They beat BSU and Ariz at home, so they'll need to win 2/3 vs. ASU, UCLA and OSU all on the road to have a chance to reach 9 wins.
So, from a "home and away" standpoint, the remaining schedule is a tough one. The ASU game is huge.
Judging by the comments and every comment that is critical of Sark receiving a ton of thumb downs and doog 101 posts like this have 7 thumbs up and zero thumbs down our fan base has learned nothing.
Again with the blaming of the conference schedule?!! Jesus Christ when do these excuses ever fucking end?!
This is why Washington is dead. Fans like these fucks put zero pressure and in fact support this bullshit program. So there is no sudden rush to change anything. To upper campus everything is going just great. -
The excuses for Sark end the day after he's fired. Coincidentally, these same Doogs will tell us they knew Sark was the wrong guy all along.He_Needs_More_Time said:mhawkeye
Redondo, WA
681 comments
October 15, 2013 at 8:17 AMRating: You must be signed in to rate this post. (7) You must be signed in to rate this post. (0) Log in to
report abuse
Larry makes a great point about the schedule -- something I've noticed but haven't heard any comments about. In essence, the Husky schedule is unfriendly, in that most of the pivotal games are on the road. Here's what I mean: (looking at schedule in August)
Swing games (pivotal): BSU, Arizona, ASU, UCLA, OSU
Likely wins: Illinois, Idaho St., Cal, Colo, WSU
Likely losses: Stan, Ore
Ideally, you'd like to see the pivotal games at home and the likely wins on the road. Unfortunately, the Dawgs have 3/5 of their pivotal games on the road and 5/6 of their likely wins at home.
To win 9 games, they have to "hold serve" on all their "likely win" games and win 3 of the 5 pivotal games. All three of the remaining pivotal games are on the road. They beat BSU and Ariz at home, so they'll need to win 2/3 vs. ASU, UCLA and OSU all on the road to have a chance to reach 9 wins.
So, from a "home and away" standpoint, the remaining schedule is a tough one. The ASU game is huge.
Judging by the comments and every comment that is critical of Sark receiving a ton of thumb downs and doog 101 posts like this have 7 thumbs up and zero thumbs down our fan base has learned nothing.
Again with the blaming of the conference schedule?!! Jesus Christ when do these excuses ever fucking end?!
This is why Washington is dead. Fans like these fucks put zero pressure and in fact support this bullshit program. So there is no sudden rush to change anything. To upper campus everything is going just great.
LRR -
My wish: 7-5, lose bowl for 7-6, fire Sark, after a long and exhausting coaching search they hire Lane Kiffin
-
That's why I stopped posting on ST while back. Tired of going head to head with some of those homers w/ 3,000 posts.
I saw someone posted a link to HH today, and one of those retards went off the deep end. Funny enough, I think Jood is well aware of the situation. -
El. Oh. El.greenblood said:My wish: 7-5, lose bowl for 7-6, fire Sark, after a long and exhausting coaching search they hire Lane Kiffin
If Sark gets fired, it's before the bowl game or Scott Woodward is even more retarded than we all think he is.
-
Sark won 9 games last year and Woody agrees.
The only thing on the line Saturday is the increase in the size of the contract extension Sark signs at the end of the year
-
Would Lane coach the bowl game?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
El. Oh. El.greenblood said:My wish: 7-5, lose bowl for 7-6, fire Sark, after a long and exhausting coaching search they hire Lane Kiffin
If Sark gets fired, it's before the bowl game or Scott Woodward is even more retarded than we all think he is.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
