Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Maybe I'm just too old, sraight, and white

2

Comments

  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    15 for targeting
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    Have you been in a girl's bathroom? Notice stall doors?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    Have you been in a girl's bathroom? Notice stall doors?
    They're pretty easy to kick in.
    Such fag J.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    It's a great time to be a TUG. #TUGslife
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter

    HFNY said:

    It's all very sad. In 2016, the Federal Deficit will increase again for the first time in 6 or 7 years but Obama and the Loony Left would rather focus on transexuals.

    image

    I agree that there are more important things.

    But neither side is addressing them.

    Vocal minorities on either extreme have dominated the conversation. Nobody I know cares about this. Or if they do, it's just that they don't know why it's even a topic of conversation. We are wasting time tearing hair out and screaming about where people piss and shit in restaurants. Why anyone cares in the first place is a joke.

    Instead of professionals near the end of their careers performing a public service, we have camera friendly people (maybe we skipped that part this year) that are trained to speak in public and repeat the script they're given by their handlers as our politicians.

    As long as they can get people lathered up over shit like this, REAL issues (like the economy) get ignored, or glossed over because it isn't a flashy headline.
    Every post like this is immeasurably better if you imagine Walter Cronkite reading it aloud.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    2001400ex said:

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    Have you been in a girl's bathroom? Notice stall doors?
    You're right, except I'm talking about locker rooms
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    edited May 2016

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
    I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
    I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
    What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Obama lit the world on fire and people care which indoor plumbing facility is used by .003% of the population?
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    2001400ex said:

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
    I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
    What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
    Why do you hate transgender gym coaches?
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    2001400ex said:

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
    I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
    What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
    Why do you hate transgender gym coaches?
    My middle school's girl's PE teacher way back when was a lesbian. Not the ntd,bb kind either.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    dnc said:

    2001400ex said:

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
    I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
    What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
    Why do you hate transgender gym coaches?
    If they are transgender, why would they masturbate to young girls? Are they a lesbian trapped in a man's body?
  • RoadTrip
    RoadTrip Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,147 Founders Club
    PurpleJ said:

    I use the girls room now.

    Having to piss really bad can have that effect on you. Thank allah we can still take a walk and find a bush or a cop car if you're an OWS type.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    2001400ex said:

    dnc said:

    2001400ex said:

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
    I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
    What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
    Why do you hate transgender gym coaches?
    If they are transgender, why would they masturbate to young girls? Are they a lesbian trapped in a man's body?
    You axed "what would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way?" I said nothing about masturbation. hth
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    2001400ex said:

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
    I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
    What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
    Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    I was in a gas station and the men's room was closed so I used the women's room.

    AND I WAS PROUD TO DO SO
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    I was in a gas station and the men's room was closed so I used the women's room.

    AND I WAS PROUD TO DO SO

    Race, the HH transgender hero!!!
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
    I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
    What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
    Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.
    You are making a big deal out of nothing. Stop being a fucking pussy.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
    I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
    What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
    Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.
    You are making a big deal out of nothing. Stop being a fucking pussy.
    Ironic
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    I hope that's a wwooosssshhhh and you really aren't that fucktarded.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    2001400ex said:

    This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

    There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.

    It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

    All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
    The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
    It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
    You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
    Is staring sexual assault?
    In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
    I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
    What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
    My Gawd you are a fucking donkey.