Maybe I'm just too old, sraight, and white

greenblood · May 2016

GreenRiverGatorz said:

show previous quotes
greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.

Is staring sexual assault?

PurpleJ · May 2016

greenblood said:

show previous quotes
GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?

15 for targeting

2001400ex · May 2016

greenblood said:

show previous quotes
GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?

Have you been in a girl's bathroom? Notice stall doors?

PurpleJ · May 2016

2001400ex said:

show previous quotes
greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
Have you been in a girl's bathroom? Notice stall doors?

They're pretty easy to kick in.

2001400ex · May 2016

PurpleJ said:

show previous quotes
2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
Have you been in a girl's bathroom? Notice stall doors?
They're pretty easy to kick in.

Such fag J.

Southerndawg · May 2016

greenblood said:

show previous quotes
PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.

It's a great time to be a TUG. #TUGslife

TurdBomber · May 2016

ThomasFremont said:

show previous quotes
HFNY said:
It's all very sad. In 2016, the Federal Deficit will increase again for the first time in 6 or 7 years but Obama and the Loony Left would rather focus on transexuals.

I agree that there are more important things.

But neither side is addressing them.

Vocal minorities on either extreme have dominated the conversation. Nobody I know cares about this. Or if they do, it's just that they don't know why it's even a topic of conversation. We are wasting time tearing hair out and screaming about where people piss and shit in restaurants. Why anyone cares in the first place is a joke.

Instead of professionals near the end of their careers performing a public service, we have camera friendly people (maybe we skipped that part this year) that are trained to speak in public and repeat the script they're given by their handlers as our politicians.

As long as they can get people lathered up over shit like this, REAL issues (like the economy) get ignored, or glossed over because it isn't a flashy headline.

Every post like this is immeasurably better if you imagine Walter Cronkite reading it aloud.

greenblood · May 2016

2001400ex said:

show previous quotes
greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
Have you been in a girl's bathroom? Notice stall doors?

You're right, except I'm talking about locker rooms

GreenRiverGatorz · May 2016

greenblood said:

show previous quotes
GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?

In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.

greenblood · May 2016

GreenRiverGatorz said:

show previous quotes
greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.

I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.

2001400ex · May 2016

greenblood said:

show previous quotes
GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.

What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.

Blackie · May 2016

2001400ex said:

show previous quotes
greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.

Masturbating furiously? Is that the answer?

sarktastic · May 2016

Obama lit the world on fire and people care which indoor plumbing facility is used by .003% of the population?

dnc · May 2016

2001400ex said:

show previous quotes
greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.

Why do you hate transgender gym coaches?

GrundleStiltzkin · May 2016

dnc said:

show previous quotes
2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Why do you hate transgender gym coaches?

My middle school's girl's PE teacher way back when was a lesbian. Not the ntd,bb kind either.

2001400ex · May 2016

dnc said:

show previous quotes
2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Why do you hate transgender gym coaches?

If they are transgender, why would they masturbate to young girls? Are they a lesbian trapped in a man's body?

RoadTrip · May 2016

PurpleJ said:
I use the girls room now.

Having to piss really bad can have that effect on you. Thank allah we can still take a walk and find a bush or a cop car if you're an OWS type.

dnc · May 2016

2001400ex said:

show previous quotes
dnc said:

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Why do you hate transgender gym coaches?
If they are transgender, why would they masturbate to young girls? Are they a lesbian trapped in a man's body?

You axed "what would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way?" I said nothing about masturbation. hth

greenblood · May 2016

2001400ex said:

show previous quotes
greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.

Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.

RaceBannon · May 2016

I was in a gas station and the men's room was closed so I used the women's room.

AND I WAS PROUD TO DO SO

2001400ex · May 2016

RaceBannon said:
I was in a gas station and the men's room was closed so I used the women's room.

AND I WAS PROUD TO DO SO

Race, the HH transgender hero!!!

2001400ex · May 2016

greenblood said:

show previous quotes
2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.

You are making a big deal out of nothing. Stop being a fucking pussy.

GreenRiverGatorz · May 2016

greenblood said:

show previous quotes
2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.

The epidemic of gay men seeking visitor's passes at high schools so they can watch teen boys change would definitely lead one to believe that this transgendered bathroom policy will lead to even more sexual deviancy. Your ability to conjure up hypotheticals to be scared of is really quite remarkable.

Blackie · May 2016

GreenRiverGatorz said:

show previous quotes
greenblood said:

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.
The epidemic of gay men seeking visitor's passes at high schools so they can watch teen boys change would definitely lead one to believe that this transgendered bathroom policy will lead to even more sexual deviancy. Your ability to conjure up hypotheticals to be scared of is really quite remarkable.

but if it saves just one life...

greenblood · May 2016

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/targets_market_cap_down_6_billion_since_start_of_transgender_bathroom_policy.html

I guess here's one way to stop it...

greenblood · May 2016

2001400ex said:

show previous quotes
greenblood said:

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.
Is it that difficult to get a visitor's pass? I'm not just talking about schools anyways. The local swimming pool, the gym, etc, are good enough examples.
You are making a big deal out of nothing. Stop being a fucking pussy.

Ironic

2001400ex · May 2016

greenblood said:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/targets_market_cap_down_6_billion_since_start_of_transgender_bathroom_policy.html

I guess here's one way to stop it...

I hope that's a wwooosssshhhh and you really aren't that fucktarded.

Kaepsknee · May 2016

GreenRiverGatorz said:

show previous quotes
greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.

NO I think we should just continue to shred morality in the goal that maybe .0005 of the population can have another "look at me' moment to the disgust of about 60% of the population. We also need to give more attention to companies, washed up celebrities and state and local governments and Obama to be so courageous to stick up for those .0005.

That's what we need to continue to do.

I have a dream. A dream that one day the left will run out of groups to manufacture mistreatment to. Again it's a dream and will never be achieved.

Kaepsknee · May 2016

2001400ex said:

show previous quotes
greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
I'm referring to locker rooms not bathroom stalls.
What would an adult male be doing in a high school girls locker room any way? Your argument is FS.

My Gawd you are a fucking donkey.

GreenRiverGatorz · May 2016

salemcoog said:

show previous quotes
GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

GreenRiverGatorz said:

greenblood said:

PurpleReign said:
This is one issue I don't get why anyone is against it. Trans people have been using bathrooms without raping kids this whole time so suddenly being afraid of them is ridiculous. They pee too and that is all they want to do, and by the way they do not commit any more rape than any other group of people.

There is literally not a single legitimate reason to be opposed to trans people.
It's not limited to just bathrooms. It's going to effect student housing and locker rooms. Opposition isn't focused on trans gendered people, it's focused on perverts using federal protection laws to legally creep on young girls.

All you have to do is claim that you identify as a woman and your in like a dirty shirt. There are legitimate transgendered people, but to assume pervs aren't going to take advantage of it is stupid.
The notion that pervs have been dissuaded from committing felonies by the current lack of a law that explicitly allows people to use whichever restroom they choose, is pretty hysterical.
It was a felony, now it can be federally protected, that's the difference.
You think sexual assault has now somehow become legalized with this DOE directive? You can't be that stupid.
Is staring sexual assault?
In a private bathroom stall? Yeah, that's still a crime. Why don't we wait until there are actual instances of perverted men entering women's bathrooms to ogle women under the guise of being transgendered before we cry foul about this policy. Until then it's a total boogeyman. If that actually becomes a phenomenon then I'll be right there with you calling for the repeal of this rule.
NO I think we should just continue to shred morality in the goal that maybe .0005 of the population can have another "look at me' moment to the disgust of about 60% of the population. We also need to give more attention to companies, washed up celebrities and state and local governments and Obama to be so courageous to stick up for those .0005.

That's what we need to continue to do.

I have a dream. A dream that one day the left will run out of groups to manufacture mistreatment to. Again it's a dream and will never be achieved.

I'll admit, I don't give two shits about whether transgendered folks can use whichever bathroom they want or not. It's a completely peripheral issue and it's getting an absurd amount of attention. The world will keep spinning regardless.

That said, the argument that this is going to be a springboard for sex offenders to have a Constitutionally protected child diddling field day is fucking retarded.

Maybe I'm just too old, sraight, and white

Comments

Welcome!

Welcome!

Quick Links