Thanks Sawant you terrorist cunt
Comments
-
Must have spent all their money on Huskie season tix.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
-
Seattle closets are filled with 95-97 jerseys clamoring to see the light if the Mariners would ever win consistentlyPostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans -
Thissarktastic said:
Seattle closets are filled with 95-97 jerseys clamoring to see the light if the Mariners would ever win consistentlyPostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
Look at the support the Seahawks get. Winners sell tickets -
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans -
I don't think you understand his argument lol.salemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
-
Maybe the worst seats in the stadiumsalemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
And winners increase interest, who knew?
fucking coog loser -
I think you need to STFU and jack another IP in hopes of getting accepted on the FIFA '16 higher discussion board.
-
You clearly don't get what defines a sports town. Keep jerking off onto your Lombardi replica and believe that one win makes Seattle a good sports town.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Maybe the worst seats in the stadiumsalemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
And winners increase interest, who knew?
fucking coog loser -
How many other sports towns have Chevron car races? That's what I thought!
-
salemcoog said:
You clearly don't get what defines a sports town. Keep jerking off onto your Lombardi replica and believe that one win makes Seattle a good sports town.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Maybe the worst seats in the stadiumsalemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
And winners increase interest, who knew?
fucking coog loser
Winning is what makes a sports town.
Cleveland is probably a sports mecca using your fucktarded logic.
And I don't think Seattle is anything special as far as "sports towns" go. The city will support winners, but I don't blame people for not wanting to watch losers like the Mariners and Huskies.
HTH, even though I know it won't. -
Winning is PART of being a good sports town. The other part is people supporting their pro teams when they aren't doing so well. So they don't leave town. Sound familiar? Chicago is probably the best example of that. Their 5 big league franchises only won one thing in 30 years until Jordan showed up but the town showed up to support them anyway.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:
You clearly don't get what defines a sports town. Keep jerking off onto your Lombardi replica and believe that one win makes Seattle a good sports town.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Maybe the worst seats in the stadiumsalemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
And winners increase interest, who knew?
fucking coog loser
Winning is what makes a sports town.
Cleveland is probably a sports mecca using your fucktarded logic.
And I don't think Seattle is anything special as far as "sports towns" go. The city will support winners, but I don't blame people for not wanting to watch losers like the Mariners and Huskies.
HTH, even though I know it won't.
That's what defines a good sports town. Not Seahawk fans selling out Century Link after Super Bowl appearances. -
The Seahawks have almost always had a lot of supportsalemcoog said:
Winning is PART of being a good sports town. The other part is people supporting their pro teams when they aren't doing so well. So they don't leave town. Sound familiar? Chicago is probably the best example of that. Their 5 big league franchises only won one thing in 30 years until Jordan showed up but the town showed up to support them anyway.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:
You clearly don't get what defines a sports town. Keep jerking off onto your Lombardi replica and believe that one win makes Seattle a good sports town.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Maybe the worst seats in the stadiumsalemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
And winners increase interest, who knew?
fucking coog loser
Winning is what makes a sports town.
Cleveland is probably a sports mecca using your fucktarded logic.
And I don't think Seattle is anything special as far as "sports towns" go. The city will support winners, but I don't blame people for not wanting to watch losers like the Mariners and Huskies.
HTH, even though I know it won't.
That's what defines a good sports town. Not Seahawk fans selling out Century Link after Super Bowl appearances.
And people in Chicago like the Cubs because it's pretty much an excuse to get drunk and party.
Not many loser franchises are supported in the US like the Cubs are...at UW we called it a statistical outlier.
Not sure what they teach in cow town. -
Myopia is what they teach wherever the fuck you went to school obviously as you forgot about the Bears, Bulls, White Sox and Blackhawks and the support that Chicago has given them win or lose.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The Seahawks have almost always had a lot of supportsalemcoog said:
Winning is PART of being a good sports town. The other part is people supporting their pro teams when they aren't doing so well. So they don't leave town. Sound familiar? Chicago is probably the best example of that. Their 5 big league franchises only won one thing in 30 years until Jordan showed up but the town showed up to support them anyway.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:
You clearly don't get what defines a sports town. Keep jerking off onto your Lombardi replica and believe that one win makes Seattle a good sports town.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Maybe the worst seats in the stadiumsalemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
And winners increase interest, who knew?
fucking coog loser
Winning is what makes a sports town.
Cleveland is probably a sports mecca using your fucktarded logic.
And I don't think Seattle is anything special as far as "sports towns" go. The city will support winners, but I don't blame people for not wanting to watch losers like the Mariners and Huskies.
HTH, even though I know it won't.
That's what defines a good sports town. Not Seahawk fans selling out Century Link after Super Bowl appearances.
And people in Chicago like the Cubs because it's pretty much an excuse to get drunk and party.
Not many loser franchises are supported in the US like the Cubs are...at UW we called it a statistical outlier.
Not sure what they teach in cow town.
You've stumbled over the Hondo bar and have arrived in imaloser land. Congrats. -
Those teams still had winning seasons you fucking dipshit.salemcoog said:
Myopia is what they teach wherever the fuck you went to school obviously as you forgot about the Bears, Bulls, White Sox and Blackhawks and the support that Chicago has given them win or lose.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The Seahawks have almost always had a lot of supportsalemcoog said:
Winning is PART of being a good sports town. The other part is people supporting their pro teams when they aren't doing so well. So they don't leave town. Sound familiar? Chicago is probably the best example of that. Their 5 big league franchises only won one thing in 30 years until Jordan showed up but the town showed up to support them anyway.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:
You clearly don't get what defines a sports town. Keep jerking off onto your Lombardi replica and believe that one win makes Seattle a good sports town.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Maybe the worst seats in the stadiumsalemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
And winners increase interest, who knew?
fucking coog loser
Winning is what makes a sports town.
Cleveland is probably a sports mecca using your fucktarded logic.
And I don't think Seattle is anything special as far as "sports towns" go. The city will support winners, but I don't blame people for not wanting to watch losers like the Mariners and Huskies.
HTH, even though I know it won't.
That's what defines a good sports town. Not Seahawk fans selling out Century Link after Super Bowl appearances.
And people in Chicago like the Cubs because it's pretty much an excuse to get drunk and party.
Not many loser franchises are supported in the US like the Cubs are...at UW we called it a statistical outlier.
Not sure what they teach in cow town.
You've stumbled over the Hondo bar and have arrived in imaloser land. Congrats.
They weren't inept on an annual basis ala the Mariners
I like a lot of the stuff you post. But you're dead wrong on this, partner -
Pretty sure the ownership group if I've followed along correctlysalemcoog said:
So when the teams suck and the arena is half full of actual paying attendants, who will foot the bill then?Tequilla said:
Unless I've completely misread the entire proposed funding, none of the funding was going to be put in a position where the general population was going to be paying for it regardless of use. The public contribution was going to be all dependent upon those that would use the facility through taxes on tickets, etc. Simply put, if you don't want to pay taxes, then don't go to the arena. No change in anybody's lives as it is.doogsinparadise said:I want the Sonics back, and it's possible that this was the best deal that Hansen is willing to make, but property taxes are starting to get out of control as it is and where else are you going to get the money without an income tax.
As someone without kids (and I'm sure I'm not the only person on this bored in this position), I could argue that I'm pissed at some of the taxes that I pay to support educational initiatives because they don't directly impact me. Or, just as likely, I could complain about how much funding goes to furthering the arts given that I don't go to an art museum, a symphony, etc. But who am I say that my interests are better/worse than others. -
I like to use Chicago as an example of a great sports town but overlook the vast empty seats for Blackhawks games as recent as 10-15 years ago ... but you're a FS Coug like that
-
We? have an arena.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
When did Portland get hit by a meteor?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
But how is Seattle the most pussified city in America?PostGameOrangeSlices said:I didn't read the whole thread, but the 4 guys on the council that have an ounce of civic pride voted yes
The 5 dry vaginas voted no
All that needs to be said -
So does SeattleTierbsHsotBoobs said:
We? have an arena.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
When did Portland get hit by a meteor?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
But how is Seattle the most pussified city in America?PostGameOrangeSlices said:I didn't read the whole thread, but the 4 guys on the council that have an ounce of civic pride voted yes
The 5 dry vaginas voted no
All that needs to be said
It's just a piece of shit one.
Also, NFL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NBA
The Blazers are a million times better than the M's though -
Oregon has its own pro football team.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
So does SeattleTierbsHsotBoobs said:
We? have an arena.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
When did Portland get hit by a meteor?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
But how is Seattle the most pussified city in America?PostGameOrangeSlices said:I didn't read the whole thread, but the 4 guys on the council that have an ounce of civic pride voted yes
The 5 dry vaginas voted no
All that needs to be said
It's just a piece of shit one.
Also, NFL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NBA
The Blazers are a million times better than the M's though -
I think the smartest sports fans are bandwagon fans. Put shit on the field, I'm not watching and not buying tickets. Improve and have success, and I'm buying and watching. Who the fuck wants to watch losers lose? Cuogs? As if cheering fans have fuck all to do with winning anyway.
-
Disagree.TurdBuffer said:Who the fuck wants to watch losers lose? Cuogs? As if cheering fans have fuck all to do with winning anyway.
-
#OurTimbers????TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon has its own pro football team.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
So does SeattleTierbsHsotBoobs said:
We? have an arena.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
When did Portland get hit by a meteor?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
But how is Seattle the most pussified city in America?PostGameOrangeSlices said:I didn't read the whole thread, but the 4 guys on the council that have an ounce of civic pride voted yes
The 5 dry vaginas voted no
All that needs to be said
It's just a piece of shit one.
Also, NFL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NBA
The Blazers are a million times better than the M's though
-
#OurTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon has its own pro football team.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
So does SeattleTierbsHsotBoobs said:
We? have an arena.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
When did Portland get hit by a meteor?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
But how is Seattle the most pussified city in America?PostGameOrangeSlices said:I didn't read the whole thread, but the 4 guys on the council that have an ounce of civic pride voted yes
The 5 dry vaginas voted no
All that needs to be said
It's just a piece of shit one.
Also, NFL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NBA
The Blazers are a million times better than the M's thoughThunderSteel -
I've completely changed my views on bandwagon fans the past few years. Even if you are rich, wasting money on loser teams is FS.TurdBuffer said:I think the smartest sports fans are bandwagon fans. Put shit on the field, I'm not watching and not buying tickets. Improve and have success, and I'm buying and watching. Who the fuck wants to watch losers lose? Cuogs? As if cheering fans have fuck all to do with winning anyway.
-
@RoadDawg55: It's not just the money. It's having my time wasted and being taken as a fool by organizations employing multi-millionaires (pro sports), or "sponsoring student athletes" (college sports) who have such little respect for the fanbase, and/or whom are driving some feel-good, PC-driven "it's only a game" agenda that they can't tell or don't know the difference between genuine passion and effort, and phone-it-in pretenders wearing their team colors. They sip wine, murmur "Go Team" once in awhile, get their photo ops and just expect fans to show up and overpay for the product on the field. Well, fuck that. I'd rather watch my paint dry. At least it gets it's job done.
-
And one more thing: Can we make it a rule to never put "Sawant" and "Cunt" in the same sentence again?
I'm shaking and about to vomit putrid smelly acidic bile that smell's better than Sawant's breath, I'm sure. -
But wasting time is ok apparently, or HH wouldn't exist lmao.RoadDawg55 said:
I've completely changed my views on bandwagon fans the past few years. Even if you are rich, wasting money on loser teams is FS.TurdBuffer said:I think the smartest sports fans are bandwagon fans. Put shit on the field, I'm not watching and not buying tickets. Improve and have success, and I'm buying and watching. Who the fuck wants to watch losers lose? Cuogs? As if cheering fans have fuck all to do with winning anyway.
-
You serious Clark?sarktastic said:
It's precisely this thinking that needs to change. That real estate belongs to ALL of us.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Jesus J, I just shake my head in disbelief at the shit that flows out your ass. Someday you and the family might be able to afford the trip north to Seattle from Roy. It'll be a short stay though. The cost to feed the family and park will force a quick exit back to the south sound and the nearest golden corral.PurpleJ said:Is the rental located in your ass? #assflow for pumpy
If someday you find a high paying $15 Sawant job up here, the company will be insolvent by the time you interview so DO NOT quit the day job in Buckley beforehand. That's free puppy advice. Any more will cost you
Rents should revert to 30 year mean average. Landlords should be taxed a "community usage fee" for each renter for the burden they put on community seeeervices.
Landlords should be fined if they try to pass tax increases on to renters. -
Ive been in idaho part time for 20 years. I ditch Seattle the second I head down the Lewiston grade. No worries sledogSledog said:
Just leave Seattle in Seattle when you come to Idaho!puppylove_sugarsteel said:Arena proposal voted down. Fuck Seattle, fuck their butthuffing mayor, fuck the city council, fuck every new fish transplant that lives here.
Im a wild Seattle resident. I dont even know this city, or State anymore, the city I grew up in. Im selling my real estate in this buttfuckered city and moving to idaho. Wont pay another tax to these rainblow warrior sodomists. -
Wow. So, no private property, 'cause "it belongs to all of us." No, you Communist-Jungle Resident, it doesn't. It belongs to those who paid for it, best take care of it and put it to it's best use, who in turn pay the taxes that put schools, roads and cops on the beat to protect your ass. If renters want all the shit they keep voting for, they can pay for it through rent increases. That's as fair as it gets.sarktastic said:
It's precisely this thinking that needs to change. That real estate belongs to ALL of us.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Jesus J, I just shake my head in disbelief at the shit that flows out your ass. Someday you and the family might be able to afford the trip north to Seattle from Roy. It'll be a short stay though. The cost to feed the family and park will force a quick exit back to the south sound and the nearest golden corral.PurpleJ said:Is the rental located in your ass? #assflow for pumpy
If someday you find a high paying $15 Sawant job up here, the company will be insolvent by the time you interview so DO NOT quit the day job in Buckley beforehand. That's free puppy advice. Any more will cost you
Rents should revert to 30 year mean average. Landlords should be taxed a "community usage fee" for each renter for the burden they put on community seeeervices.
Landlords should be fined if they try to pass tax increases on to renters.
