Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Thanks Sawant you terrorist cunt
Comments
-
Winning is PART of being a good sports town. The other part is people supporting their pro teams when they aren't doing so well. So they don't leave town. Sound familiar? Chicago is probably the best example of that. Their 5 big league franchises only won one thing in 30 years until Jordan showed up but the town showed up to support them anyway.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:
You clearly don't get what defines a sports town. Keep jerking off onto your Lombardi replica and believe that one win makes Seattle a good sports town.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Maybe the worst seats in the stadiumsalemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
And winners increase interest, who knew?
fucking coog loser
Winning is what makes a sports town.
Cleveland is probably a sports mecca using your fucktarded logic.
And I don't think Seattle is anything special as far as "sports towns" go. The city will support winners, but I don't blame people for not wanting to watch losers like the Mariners and Huskies.
HTH, even though I know it won't.
That's what defines a good sports town. Not Seahawk fans selling out Century Link after Super Bowl appearances. -
The Seahawks have almost always had a lot of supportsalemcoog said:
Winning is PART of being a good sports town. The other part is people supporting their pro teams when they aren't doing so well. So they don't leave town. Sound familiar? Chicago is probably the best example of that. Their 5 big league franchises only won one thing in 30 years until Jordan showed up but the town showed up to support them anyway.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:
You clearly don't get what defines a sports town. Keep jerking off onto your Lombardi replica and believe that one win makes Seattle a good sports town.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Maybe the worst seats in the stadiumsalemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
And winners increase interest, who knew?
fucking coog loser
Winning is what makes a sports town.
Cleveland is probably a sports mecca using your fucktarded logic.
And I don't think Seattle is anything special as far as "sports towns" go. The city will support winners, but I don't blame people for not wanting to watch losers like the Mariners and Huskies.
HTH, even though I know it won't.
That's what defines a good sports town. Not Seahawk fans selling out Century Link after Super Bowl appearances.
And people in Chicago like the Cubs because it's pretty much an excuse to get drunk and party.
Not many loser franchises are supported in the US like the Cubs are...at UW we called it a statistical outlier.
Not sure what they teach in cow town. -
Myopia is what they teach wherever the fuck you went to school obviously as you forgot about the Bears, Bulls, White Sox and Blackhawks and the support that Chicago has given them win or lose.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The Seahawks have almost always had a lot of supportsalemcoog said:
Winning is PART of being a good sports town. The other part is people supporting their pro teams when they aren't doing so well. So they don't leave town. Sound familiar? Chicago is probably the best example of that. Their 5 big league franchises only won one thing in 30 years until Jordan showed up but the town showed up to support them anyway.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:
You clearly don't get what defines a sports town. Keep jerking off onto your Lombardi replica and believe that one win makes Seattle a good sports town.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Maybe the worst seats in the stadiumsalemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
And winners increase interest, who knew?
fucking coog loser
Winning is what makes a sports town.
Cleveland is probably a sports mecca using your fucktarded logic.
And I don't think Seattle is anything special as far as "sports towns" go. The city will support winners, but I don't blame people for not wanting to watch losers like the Mariners and Huskies.
HTH, even though I know it won't.
That's what defines a good sports town. Not Seahawk fans selling out Century Link after Super Bowl appearances.
And people in Chicago like the Cubs because it's pretty much an excuse to get drunk and party.
Not many loser franchises are supported in the US like the Cubs are...at UW we called it a statistical outlier.
Not sure what they teach in cow town.
You've stumbled over the Hondo bar and have arrived in imaloser land. Congrats. -
Those teams still had winning seasons you fucking dipshit.salemcoog said:
Myopia is what they teach wherever the fuck you went to school obviously as you forgot about the Bears, Bulls, White Sox and Blackhawks and the support that Chicago has given them win or lose.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
The Seahawks have almost always had a lot of supportsalemcoog said:
Winning is PART of being a good sports town. The other part is people supporting their pro teams when they aren't doing so well. So they don't leave town. Sound familiar? Chicago is probably the best example of that. Their 5 big league franchises only won one thing in 30 years until Jordan showed up but the town showed up to support them anyway.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:
You clearly don't get what defines a sports town. Keep jerking off onto your Lombardi replica and believe that one win makes Seattle a good sports town.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Maybe the worst seats in the stadiumsalemcoog said:
You could walk up and get Seahawk tickets for $10 a piece and a smile pre-2004. The Sonics had low capacity and still didn't sell out during the lean years. But I'm hearing your WHL team is killing it this year at the gate so mad props.PostGameOrangeSlices said:salemcoog said:Seattle is the shittiest sports town in the Country that has some density. Why WOULD anyone devote public money to fund an arena for teams that won't be supported unless they are on top???
No it's not.
People not wanting to see the shitshow Mariners lose in person =/= bad sports fans
And winners increase interest, who knew?
fucking coog loser
Winning is what makes a sports town.
Cleveland is probably a sports mecca using your fucktarded logic.
And I don't think Seattle is anything special as far as "sports towns" go. The city will support winners, but I don't blame people for not wanting to watch losers like the Mariners and Huskies.
HTH, even though I know it won't.
That's what defines a good sports town. Not Seahawk fans selling out Century Link after Super Bowl appearances.
And people in Chicago like the Cubs because it's pretty much an excuse to get drunk and party.
Not many loser franchises are supported in the US like the Cubs are...at UW we called it a statistical outlier.
Not sure what they teach in cow town.
You've stumbled over the Hondo bar and have arrived in imaloser land. Congrats.
They weren't inept on an annual basis ala the Mariners
I like a lot of the stuff you post. But you're dead wrong on this, partner -
Pretty sure the ownership group if I've followed along correctlysalemcoog said:
So when the teams suck and the arena is half full of actual paying attendants, who will foot the bill then?Tequilla said:
Unless I've completely misread the entire proposed funding, none of the funding was going to be put in a position where the general population was going to be paying for it regardless of use. The public contribution was going to be all dependent upon those that would use the facility through taxes on tickets, etc. Simply put, if you don't want to pay taxes, then don't go to the arena. No change in anybody's lives as it is.doogsinparadise said:I want the Sonics back, and it's possible that this was the best deal that Hansen is willing to make, but property taxes are starting to get out of control as it is and where else are you going to get the money without an income tax.
As someone without kids (and I'm sure I'm not the only person on this bored in this position), I could argue that I'm pissed at some of the taxes that I pay to support educational initiatives because they don't directly impact me. Or, just as likely, I could complain about how much funding goes to furthering the arts given that I don't go to an art museum, a symphony, etc. But who am I say that my interests are better/worse than others. -
I like to use Chicago as an example of a great sports town but overlook the vast empty seats for Blackhawks games as recent as 10-15 years ago ... but you're a FS Coug like that
-
We? have an arena.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
When did Portland get hit by a meteor?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
But how is Seattle the most pussified city in America?PostGameOrangeSlices said:I didn't read the whole thread, but the 4 guys on the council that have an ounce of civic pride voted yes
The 5 dry vaginas voted no
All that needs to be said -
So does SeattleTierbsHsotBoobs said:
We? have an arena.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
When did Portland get hit by a meteor?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
But how is Seattle the most pussified city in America?PostGameOrangeSlices said:I didn't read the whole thread, but the 4 guys on the council that have an ounce of civic pride voted yes
The 5 dry vaginas voted no
All that needs to be said
It's just a piece of shit one.
Also, NFL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NBA
The Blazers are a million times better than the M's though -
Oregon has its own pro football team.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
So does SeattleTierbsHsotBoobs said:
We? have an arena.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
When did Portland get hit by a meteor?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
But how is Seattle the most pussified city in America?PostGameOrangeSlices said:I didn't read the whole thread, but the 4 guys on the council that have an ounce of civic pride voted yes
The 5 dry vaginas voted no
All that needs to be said
It's just a piece of shit one.
Also, NFL >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NBA
The Blazers are a million times better than the M's though -
I think the smartest sports fans are bandwagon fans. Put shit on the field, I'm not watching and not buying tickets. Improve and have success, and I'm buying and watching. Who the fuck wants to watch losers lose? Cuogs? As if cheering fans have fuck all to do with winning anyway.
