Wtf? I thought voter ID was about voter fraud
Asked about how Ted Cruz or Donald Trump could win Wisconsin in the general election, Grothman said, "I think Hillary Clinton is about the weakest candidate the Democrats have ever put up. And now we have photo ID, and I think photo ID is going to make a little bit of a difference as well."
http://www.vox.com/2016/4/6/11377078/voter-id-republicans-grothman
Comments
-
#whyhondocameback
-
Maybe he's right and the Ds benefit from voter fraud more than the Rs? Ever think of that? You have a weird habit of making someone else's argument for them with your retard logic.
-
You need to dig deeper.PurpleJ said:Maybe he's right and the Ds benefit from voter fraud more than the Rs? Ever think of that? You have a weird habit of making someone else's argument for them with your retard logic.
-
They can't afford ID?doogsinparadise said:
You need to dig deeper.PurpleJ said:Maybe he's right and the Ds benefit from voter fraud more than the Rs? Ever think of that? You have a weird habit of making someone else's argument for them with your retard logic.
-
How many Americans vote as it is? 25%?
Registration should just be part of your tax return: automatic and compulsory. It's just that the GOP recognizes that their vote share in inversely related to turnout, and so they support anything that suppresses the vote. It's soft discrimination, not hard, but it's still a factor in disenfranchising people.
If you're confident in your political argument then it shouldn't matter how many people vote. -
Tammany and I shared a good laugh over this one. Maybe registration should be mandatory, but some people don't like being put on lists. You act as if there isn't a history of shady voting practices on both sides. Aren't the Dems suppressing Sanders voters right now? The fact of the matter is that the election system is fucked on both sides.doogsinparadise said:How many Americans vote as it is? 25%?
Registration should just be part of your tax return: automatic and compulsory. It's just that the GOP recognizes that their vote share in inversely related to turnout, and so they support anything that suppresses the vote. It's soft discrimination, not hard, but it's still a factor in disenfranchising people.
If you're confident in your political argument then it shouldn't matter how many people vote. -
Stop living in the past.PurpleJ said:
Tammany and I shared a good laugh over this one. Maybe registration should be mandatory, but some people don't like being put on lists. You act as if there isn't a history of shady voting practices on both sides. Aren't the Dems suppressing Sanders voters right now? The fact of the matter is that the election system is fucked on both sides.doogsinparadise said:How many Americans vote as it is? 25%?
Registration should just be part of your tax return: automatic and compulsory. It's just that the GOP recognizes that their vote share in inversely related to turnout, and so they support anything that suppresses the vote. It's soft discrimination, not hard, but it's still a factor in disenfranchising people.
If you're confident in your political argument then it shouldn't matter how many people vote. -
So how about the DNC rigging it now?ThomasFremont said:
Stop living in the past.PurpleJ said:
Tammany and I shared a good laugh over this one. Maybe registration should be mandatory, but some people don't like being put on lists. You act as if there isn't a history of shady voting practices on both sides. Aren't the Dems suppressing Sanders voters right now? The fact of the matter is that the election system is fucked on both sides.doogsinparadise said:How many Americans vote as it is? 25%?
Registration should just be part of your tax return: automatic and compulsory. It's just that the GOP recognizes that their vote share in inversely related to turnout, and so they support anything that suppresses the vote. It's soft discrimination, not hard, but it's still a factor in disenfranchising people.
If you're confident in your political argument then it shouldn't matter how many people vote.
-
Agree it's happening on both sides, and is not a partisan issue (at least it shouldn't be).PurpleJ said:
So how about the DNC rigging it now?ThomasFremont said:
Stop living in the past.PurpleJ said:
Tammany and I shared a good laugh over this one. Maybe registration should be mandatory, but some people don't like being put on lists. You act as if there isn't a history of shady voting practices on both sides. Aren't the Dems suppressing Sanders voters right now? The fact of the matter is that the election system is fucked on both sides.doogsinparadise said:How many Americans vote as it is? 25%?
Registration should just be part of your tax return: automatic and compulsory. It's just that the GOP recognizes that their vote share in inversely related to turnout, and so they support anything that suppresses the vote. It's soft discrimination, not hard, but it's still a factor in disenfranchising people.
If you're confident in your political argument then it shouldn't matter how many people vote.
Although GOP Governors gerrymander like nobodies business. But I digress...
It all boils down to those in power doing what it takes to hold power. And since good ideas are too much work for these whores, they quietly change the rules to prevent being challenged. At this point they don't even try to hide it, because they know people can't or won't do a damn thing about it. -
It should be harder to vote. Not financially but if you are too stupid or lazy to make an effort to vote then fuck you.
Why not just have everyone who isn't registered to vote marked down as a D vote and be done with it? -
Race, protecting the Constitution as always.RaceBannon said:It should be harder to vote. Not financially but if you are too stupid or lazy to make an effort to vote then fuck you.
Why not just have everyone who isn't registered to vote marked down as a D vote and be done with it? -
PurpleJ said:
So how about the DNC rigging it now?ThomasFremont said:
Stop living in the past.PurpleJ said:
Tammany and I shared a good laugh over this one. Maybe registration should be mandatory, but some people don't like being put on lists. You act as if there isn't a history of shady voting practices on both sides. Aren't the Dems suppressing Sanders voters right now? The fact of the matter is that the election system is fucked on both sides.doogsinparadise said:How many Americans vote as it is? 25%?
Registration should just be part of your tax return: automatic and compulsory. It's just that the GOP recognizes that their vote share in inversely related to turnout, and so they support anything that suppresses the vote. It's soft discrimination, not hard, but it's still a factor in disenfranchising people.
If you're confident in your political argument then it shouldn't matter how many people vote.
-
My Wikipedia research says between 50-60% have voted the past three elections. It seems high though.doogsinparadise said:How many Americans vote as it is? 25%?
Registration should just be part of your tax return: automatic and compulsory. It's just that the GOP recognizes that their vote share in inversely related to turnout, and so they support anything that suppresses the vote. It's soft discrimination, not hard, but it's still a factor in disenfranchising people.
If you're confident in your political argument then it shouldn't matter how many people vote. -
That's probably of registered voters, no?RoadDawg55 said:
My Wikipedia research says between 50-60% have voted the past three elections. It seems high though.doogsinparadise said:How many Americans vote as it is? 25%?
Registration should just be part of your tax return: automatic and compulsory. It's just that the GOP recognizes that their vote share in inversely related to turnout, and so they support anything that suppresses the vote. It's soft discrimination, not hard, but it's still a factor in disenfranchising people.
If you're confident in your political argument then it shouldn't matter how many people vote. -
Stupid even for you2001400ex said:
Race, protecting the Constitution as always.RaceBannon said:It should be harder to vote. Not financially but if you are too stupid or lazy to make an effort to vote then fuck you.
Why not just have everyone who isn't registered to vote marked down as a D vote and be done with it? -
It's not about getting more D votes. It's not about being lazy voters.RaceBannon said:It should be harder to vote. Not financially but if you are too stupid or lazy to make an effort to vote then fuck you.
Why not just have everyone who isn't registered to vote marked down as a D vote and be done with it?
The lazy ones are the people that close over half of the polling locations in their county, creating 5+ hour lines to vote. And provisional ballots not being counted, despite Independents correctly filling out their paperwork, just because they're not registered democrats (aka Bernie voters).
I don't know about you Race, but my time is too valuable to spend 1 hour, much less 5 in line to vote.
-
My ballot is mailed to me.ThomasFremont said:
It's not about getting more D votes. It's not about being lazy voters.RaceBannon said:It should be harder to vote. Not financially but if you are too stupid or lazy to make an effort to vote then fuck you.
Why not just have everyone who isn't registered to vote marked down as a D vote and be done with it?
The lazy ones are the people that close over half of the polling locations in their county, creating 5+ hour lines to vote. And provisional ballots not being counted, despite Independents correctly filling out their paperwork, just because they're not registered democrats (aka Bernie voters).
I don't know about you Race, but my time is too valuable to spend 1 hour, much less 5 in line to vote. -
Read the Constitution fuckstick.RaceBannon said:
Stupid even for you2001400ex said:
Race, protecting the Constitution as always.RaceBannon said:It should be harder to vote. Not financially but if you are too stupid or lazy to make an effort to vote then fuck you.
Why not just have everyone who isn't registered to vote marked down as a D vote and be done with it? -
So is mine.RaceBannon said:
My ballot is mailed to me.ThomasFremont said:
It's not about getting more D votes. It's not about being lazy voters.RaceBannon said:It should be harder to vote. Not financially but if you are too stupid or lazy to make an effort to vote then fuck you.
Why not just have everyone who isn't registered to vote marked down as a D vote and be done with it?
The lazy ones are the people that close over half of the polling locations in their county, creating 5+ hour lines to vote. And provisional ballots not being counted, despite Independents correctly filling out their paperwork, just because they're not registered democrats (aka Bernie voters).
I don't know about you Race, but my time is too valuable to spend 1 hour, much less 5 in line to vote.
But we can't all be winners.
Someone has to live in Arizona. -
Heck Ted Kennedy is now eligible to vote in Chicago. I think there is more voter fraud than we realize. ID to vote should be mandatory it's not discriminatory in any way. You need ID for everything else.PurpleJ said:Maybe he's right and the Ds benefit from voter fraud more than the Rs? Ever think of that? You have a weird habit of making someone else's argument for them with your retard logic.
-
I think there's a couple provisions in the Constitution regarding access to voting. You should read them.Sledog said:
Heck Ted Kennedy is now eligible to vote in Chicago. I think there is more voter fraud than we realize. ID to vote should be mandatory it's not discriminatory in any way. You need ID for everything else.PurpleJ said:Maybe he's right and the Ds benefit from voter fraud more than the Rs? Ever think of that? You have a weird habit of making someone else's argument for them with your retard logic.
-
Yeah you need to be a citizen for one.2001400ex said:
I think there's a couple provisions in the Constitution regarding access to voting. You should read them.Sledog said:
Heck Ted Kennedy is now eligible to vote in Chicago. I think there is more voter fraud than we realize. ID to vote should be mandatory it's not discriminatory in any way. You need ID for everything else.PurpleJ said:Maybe he's right and the Ds benefit from voter fraud more than the Rs? Ever think of that? You have a weird habit of making someone else's argument for them with your retard logic.
-
Too bad there is zero evidence to support this thought of yours.Sledog said:
Heck Ted Kennedy is now eligible to vote in Chicago. I think there is more voter fraud than we realize. ID to vote should be mandatory it's not discriminatory in any way. You need ID for everything else.PurpleJ said:Maybe he's right and the Ds benefit from voter fraud more than the Rs? Ever think of that? You have a weird habit of making someone else's argument for them with your retard logic.
Also, we??? -
Dino Rossi disagrees.ThomasFremont said:
Too bad there is zero evidence to support this thought of yours.Sledog said:
Heck Ted Kennedy is now eligible to vote in Chicago. I think there is more voter fraud than we realize. ID to vote should be mandatory it's not discriminatory in any way. You need ID for everything else.PurpleJ said:Maybe he's right and the Ds benefit from voter fraud more than the Rs? Ever think of that? You have a weird habit of making someone else's argument for them with your retard logic.
Also, we???
-
FIFYPurpleThrobber said:ThomasFremont said:
Too bad there is zero evidence to support this thought of yours.Sledog said:
Heck Ted Kennedy is now eligible to vote in Chicago. I think there is more voter fraud than we realize. ID to vote should be mandatory it's not discriminatory in any way. You need ID for everything else.PurpleJ said:Maybe he's right and the Ds benefit from voter fraud more than the Rs? Ever think of that? You have a weird habit of making someone else's argument for them with your retard logic.
Also, we???Dino RossiAl Gore disagrees. -
So you agree voter fraud is a thing.2001400ex said:
FIFYPurpleThrobber said:ThomasFremont said:
Too bad there is zero evidence to support this thought of yours.Sledog said:
Heck Ted Kennedy is now eligible to vote in Chicago. I think there is more voter fraud than we realize. ID to vote should be mandatory it's not discriminatory in any way. You need ID for everything else.PurpleJ said:Maybe he's right and the Ds benefit from voter fraud more than the Rs? Ever think of that? You have a weird habit of making someone else's argument for them with your retard logic.
Also, we???Dino RossiAl Gore disagrees.
Thanks for playing. -
Yes the RNC in Florida screwed the voters in the state. They took away legitimate votes. Not people who are illegal or unregistered.dnc said:
So you agree voter fraud is a thing.2001400ex said:
FIFYPurpleThrobber said:ThomasFremont said:
Too bad there is zero evidence to support this thought of yours.Sledog said:
Heck Ted Kennedy is now eligible to vote in Chicago. I think there is more voter fraud than we realize. ID to vote should be mandatory it's not discriminatory in any way. You need ID for everything else.PurpleJ said:Maybe he's right and the Ds benefit from voter fraud more than the Rs? Ever think of that? You have a weird habit of making someone else's argument for them with your retard logic.
Also, we???Dino RossiAl Gore disagrees.
Thanks for playing.
Fuckstick. -
It's only a partisan issue if you're a partisan hack.
-
What did I write that is unconstitutional? Everyone has a right to vote. Doesn't mean everyone has to. Too stupid and lazy to register too bad. For 200 years you've had to register2001400ex said:
Read the Constitution fuckstick.RaceBannon said:
Stupid even for you2001400ex said:
Race, protecting the Constitution as always.RaceBannon said:It should be harder to vote. Not financially but if you are too stupid or lazy to make an effort to vote then fuck you.
Why not just have everyone who isn't registered to vote marked down as a D vote and be done with it?
-
It should be harder to vote.RaceBannon said:
What did I write that is unconstitutional? Everyone has a right to vote. Doesn't mean everyone has to. Too stupid and lazy to register too bad. For 200 years you've had to register2001400ex said:
Read the Constitution fuckstick.RaceBannon said:
Stupid even for you2001400ex said:
Race, protecting the Constitution as always.RaceBannon said:It should be harder to vote. Not financially but if you are too stupid or lazy to make an effort to vote then fuck you.
Why not just have everyone who isn't registered to vote marked down as a D vote and be done with it?
That's your quote.
