Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Didn't See This Coming!

2

Comments

  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,615 Standard Supporter
    Gee, perverts are taking advantage of a misguided law. Who didn't see this coming from a mile away?
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    2001400ex said:

    This is really stupidly simple. If you got a cock, go to the dudes room. If you got a vagina go to the women's. If you identify as a woman, man up and get your shit chopped then you can walk into the woman's room.

    You would've fit in well with the Nazis.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    2001400ex said:

    This is really stupidly simple. If you got a cock, go to the dudes room. If you got a vagina go to the women's. If you identify as a woman, man up and get your shit chopped then you can walk into the woman's room.

    Honda...first time I agree with you
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559

    We shouldn't give people rights because others might abuse it.

    When it comes to perverts walking into female dressing rooms under the disguise of gender identity, I disagree
    What exactly is stopping a pervert from the same gender from walking into that dressing room?
    In one instance you go to jail. But apparently in Seattle its approved. That's the difference
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    This is really stupidly simple. If you got a cock, go to the dudes room. If you got a vagina go to the women's. If you identify as a woman, man up and get your shit chopped then you can walk into the woman's room.

    But what if you identify as an attack helicopter? Then what?














    That's what I thought.
    Consider yourself lucky
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    Doogles said:

    Is APAG trolling or serious? How you can equate skin color to differences in gender is beyond me.

    I don't really care if a girl takes a shit next to me, but I can see how obviously twisted this is going to become if you can sue over not feeling comfortable using the facilities intended for your sex.

    Not trolling, just trying to understand. Is the issue for the transgenders that they feel forced into using bathrooms that don't mesh with their mental identity and therefore feel threatened or uncomfortable?

    I don't care if there is a 3rd bathroom for whomever, but I don't think it's okay to infringe on people's privacy because you think you're something you're not.

    Women shouldn't have to feel threatened by a guy in their locker room because he thinks he is a woman. At the end of the day, he is physically a man and poses a real physical threat to them. We're not all the same. That's ok.

    The point is not that race and gender are the same, it's that the argument is the same.

    It's not about threatened or uncomfortable, they want the right to use that bathroom.

    In what way is a trans person using a restroom infringing on anyone elses right to privacy? Are gay people infringing on that right? Would you like to start having straight check points before entering a public restroom or locker room?

    What you think women should and should not have to feel is irrelevant. Furthermore, you are not the decider on what is and is not threatening. If women have the right to not "feel" threatened then everyone has that right. And please tell me how exactly you are going to sort through what is and is not a real threat. If I feel threatened by black people why am I not protected as well? If my argument against blacks is exactly the same as your argument against trangendered then why is one valid and one not? Do straight women feel threatened by gay women? If so what percent feel that way? How high or low does it have to be to ban lesbians from public restrooms? Your point is as ridiculous as it is stupid.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Blackie said:

    Doogles said:

    Is APAG trolling or serious? How you can equate skin color to differences in gender is beyond me.

    I don't really care if a girl takes a shit next to me, but I can see how obviously twisted this is going to become if you can sue over not feeling comfortable using the facilities intended for your sex.

    Not trolling, just trying to understand. Is the issue for the transgenders that they feel forced into using bathrooms that don't mesh with their mental identity and therefore feel threatened or uncomfortable?

    I don't care if there is a 3rd bathroom for whomever, but I don't think it's okay to infringe on people's privacy because you think you're something you're not.

    Women shouldn't have to feel threatened by a guy in their locker room because he thinks he is a woman. At the end of the day, he is physically a man and poses a real physical threat to them. We're not all the same. That's ok.

    The point is not that race and gender are the same, it's that the argument is the same.

    It's not about threatened or uncomfortable, they want the right to use that bathroom.

    In what way is a trans person using a restroom infringing on anyone elses right to privacy? Are gay people infringing on that right? Would you like to start having straight check points before entering a public restroom or locker room?

    What you think women should and should not have to feel is irrelevant. Furthermore, you are not the decider on what is and is not threatening. If women have the right to not "feel" threatened then everyone has that right. And please tell me how exactly you are going to sort through what is and is not a real threat. If I feel threatened by black people why am I not protected as well? If my argument against blacks is exactly the same as your argument against trangendered then why is one valid and one not? Do straight women feel threatened by gay women? If so what percent feel that way? How high or low does it have to be to ban lesbians from public restrooms? Your point is as ridiculous as it is stupid.
    You don't have a right to feel safe. You have a right to not be aggressed against, and to defend yourself from said aggression.
    That sounds like good grounds to get rid of the TSA.
  • HuskyInAZ
    HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732
    Doogles said:

    Is APAG trolling or serious? How you can equate skin color to differences in gender is beyond me.

    I don't really care if a girl takes a shit next to me, but I can see how obviously twisted this is going to become if you can sue over not feeling comfortable using the facilities intended for your sex.

    Not trolling, just trying to understand. Is the issue for the transgenders that they feel forced into using bathrooms that don't mesh with their mental identity and therefore feel threatened or uncomfortable?

    I don't care if there is a 3rd bathroom for whomever, but I don't think it's okay to infringe on people's privacy because you think you're something you're not.

    Women shouldn't have to feel threatened by a guy in their locker room because he thinks he is a woman. At the end of the day, he is physically a man and poses a real physical threat to them. We're not all the same. That's ok.

    Clearly he is serious. Perhaps there are some "issues" behind these rants.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,072
    DeepSeaZ said:

    DeepSeaZ said:

    HuskyInAZ said:

    We shouldn't give people rights because others might abuse it.

    But we should subjugate the rights of people who can figure out which bathroom/locker room their plumbing dictates. Got it.
    Why are blacks allowed in the same restroom/locker room as me? They're subjugating my rights.
    Lets not compare apples to oranges. Let's do this. If you have a dick use the locker room for males. If you don't women's locker room is for you.
    If you have white skin the white locker room is for you, if you have colored skin the colored locker room is for you.
    No. Sorry not buying into any type of 'isms on this one. What if I'm white and colored? Can I use both?

    Or can I just go into a women's locker room say I identify as a woman. Jerk off in the shower, which is ok, because I'm a lesbian. I have rights here so don't tell me I can't do this. Oh and I am colored. Because fuck it I woke up this morning to the smooth sounds of R & B and it felt right.
    Got any pics?

    Cyber?
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Swaye said:

    What if I feel threatened by a woman, who identifies as a man, walking into the restroom while I am pissing? I wouldn't, because I'm not a fag, but there are lots of scarf wearing dudes who would feel uncomfortable. So, when transgenders and attack helicopters feel the need to go into the "wrong" bathroom, what about the rights of others who now feel threatened having to shit in front of a woman who thinks she's a dude?

    This is some confusing shit. I'm getting always drunk.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,072
    I have been with my wife for going on 15 years now - and never once have I seen her shit or shit in front of her. Maybe once or twice taken a piss but that's it.

    We have a fantastic sex life so there's no repession. It's simply a matter of courtesy and respect for one's personal space.

    I definitely do not need to have some random chick slide up next to me in a stall. Or some dude slide into my wife's locker room.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771

    I have been with my wife for going on 15 years now - and never once have I seen her shit or shit in front of her. Maybe once or twice taken a piss but that's it.

    We have a fantastic sex life so there's no repession. It's simply a matter of courtesy and respect for one's personal space.

    I definitely do not need to have some random chick slide up next to me in a stall. Or some dude slide into my wife's locker room.

    So you do need some random dude shitting next to you?
  • Blackie
    Blackie Member Posts: 499

    I have been with my wife for going on 15 years now - and never once have I seen her shit or shit in front of her. Maybe once or twice taken a piss but that's it.

    We have a fantastic sex life so there's no repession. It's simply a matter of courtesy and respect for one's personal space.

    I definitely do not need to have some random chick slide up next to me in a stall. Or some dude slide into my wife's locker room.

    It's a stall. With a locking door. What's the issue?
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Blackie said:

    I have been with my wife for going on 15 years now - and never once have I seen her shit or shit in front of her. Maybe once or twice taken a piss but that's it.

    We have a fantastic sex life so there's no repession. It's simply a matter of courtesy and respect for one's personal space.

    I definitely do not need to have some random chick slide up next to me in a stall. Or some dude slide into my wife's locker room.

    It's a stall. With a locking door. What's the issue?
    Larry Craig ... Oh wait.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    If a transgender with a dick goes into a women's room it isn't like there is a urinal where she will whip it out. She will be in a stall.

    A transgender going into a men's room or school men's restroom could get beat up rather easily.

    I assume that is the rationale behind the law. Abuse the law and go to jail, just like any law
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    I have been with my wife for going on 15 years now - and never once have I seen her shit or shit in front of her. Maybe once or twice taken a piss but that's it.

    We have a fantastic sex life so there's no repession. It's simply a matter of courtesy and respect for one's personal space.

    I definitely do not need to have some random chick slide up next to me in a stall. Or some dude slide into my wife's locker room.

    That's some dark shit man. Do you not fart in front of her either? Never given her a Dutch oven? Clearly you don't love her and she hates you.
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    I was in an office building the other day where they had a women's restroom but the men's was designated as mens/family/trans/handicap.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    section8 said:

    I was in an office building the other day where they had a women's restroom but the men's was designated as mens/family/trans/handicap.

    Which one are you?
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    2001400ex said:

    section8 said:

    I was in an office building the other day where they had a women's restroom but the men's was designated as mens/family/trans/handicap.

    Which one are you?
    For purposes of shitting in comfort, handicapped.
  • DeepSeaZ
    DeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901
    APAG, in all seriousness. I don't need some perv or true tranny going into the women's locker room and whipping out his dong in front of my 6 year old daughter. There is never a circumstance where a little girl needs to see dong. God, this last sentence might really be a test for this board. Anyway, she's 6. She doesn't need any of this bullshit.

    We shouldn't give people rights because others might abuse it.

    When it comes to perverts walking into female dressing rooms under the disguise of gender identity, I disagree
    What exactly is stopping a pervert from the same gender from walking into that dressing room?
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    DeepSeaZ said:

    APAG, in all seriousness. I don't need some perv or true tranny going into the women's locker room and whipping out his dong in front of my 6 year old daughter. There is never a circumstance where a little girl needs to see dong. God, this last sentence might really be a test for this board. Anyway, she's 6. She doesn't need any of this bullshit.

    We shouldn't give people rights because others might abuse it.

    When it comes to perverts walking into female dressing rooms under the disguise of gender identity, I disagree
    What exactly is stopping a pervert from the same gender from walking into that dressing room?
    So all these perverts are free to go to the men's room and harass 6 year old boys?

    As for the non retarded part of your point, you think seeing a body part is going to scar your daughter for life because you don't have the parenting skills to explain it, that's fine. Don't let your daughter go in locker rooms.

    This is all new and scary but if we just accept it we'll normalize it and in a few years it won't be a big deal. A little girl sees a penis, asks what's that and you get to explain to her that some people are transgender. A nice teaching moment.

    Seeing a penis isn't going to scar your daughter. The problem is you haven't accepted the fact that she's going to suck dick one day. The problem is that we view women's sexuality as different then men's. That's why these complaints always mention little girls. But their sexuality isn't different and you, as parents, would do your kid a huge favor by coming to that realization. Sex is an amazing thing that your daughter will one day enjoy and seeing a penis at 6 years old will have zero impact on that. Your poor parenting, on the other hand, could really screw her up.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    @allpurpleallgold: You've done it. You've completely contradicted yourself. Place dunce cap upon your head and sit in front of the class. Nobody actually gives a shit about this stuff except the tranny community and it's sycophants like yourself. Cocks go in urinals. Cunts go in stalls. Your incredibly ridiculous argument about a 6 year old girl seeing another man's penis completely and utterly destroys your own argument and hoists it on it's own petard. If a guy's dick shouldn't matter to a six year old girl, then why should any differences in genitalia matter to a dude with fake tits, women's clothes, and a cock? Why shouldn't that community get the fuck over it already and go to the appropriate bathroom of which their plumbing dictates? Answer: Because they want to draw the rest of humanity into their self-obsession and gender-identity crisis, when the rest of humanity just wants to piss, shit, and wash up without some fucked up, confused, genitalia obsessed freak turning the whole thing into a spectacle.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913

    DeepSeaZ said:

    APAG, in all seriousness. I don't need some perv or true tranny going into the women's locker room and whipping out his dong in front of my 6 year old daughter. There is never a circumstance where a little girl needs to see dong. God, this last sentence might really be a test for this board. Anyway, she's 6. She doesn't need any of this bullshit.

    We shouldn't give people rights because others might abuse it.

    When it comes to perverts walking into female dressing rooms under the disguise of gender identity, I disagree
    What exactly is stopping a pervert from the same gender from walking into that dressing room?
    So all these perverts are free to go to the men's room and harass 6 year old boys?

    As for the non retarded part of your point, you think seeing a body part is going to scar your daughter for life because you don't have the parenting skills to explain it, that's fine. Don't let your daughter go in locker rooms.

    This is all new and scary but if we just accept it we'll normalize it and in a few years it won't be a big deal. A little girl sees a penis, asks what's that and you get to explain to her that some people are transgender. A nice teaching moment.

    Seeing a penis isn't going to scar your daughter. The problem is you haven't accepted the fact that she's going to suck dick one day. The problem is that we view women's sexuality as different then men's. That's why these complaints always mention little girls. But their sexuality isn't different and you, as parents, would do your kid a huge favor by coming to that realization. Sex is an amazing thing that your daughter will one day enjoy and seeing a penis at 6 years old will have zero impact on that. Your poor parenting, on the other hand, could really screw her up.
    Kreist. Please dont' breed.
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    It's not a contradiction. You are unable to take your own stupid point to its stupid logical conclusion. If it shouldn't matter to a 6 year old then it shouldn't matter to a transgendered person then it shouldn't matter to you and it shouldn't matter to anyone. So why the fuck are we talking about this again?

    Do you see how stupid you are? You've made up your mind, you're not even trying to understand the other side, all you're doing is looking for that gotcha moment. "Oh he contradicted himself!" You're a fuck boy.
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,509
    The solution here is pretty simple. The entire US should be a nudist colony
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,039 Standard Supporter
    @allpurpleallgold wrote: "The problem is that we view women's sexuality as different then men's." No shit, Sherlock. Only because sustainability of the human race depended on that which you term a "problem." How sexually confused are you? Dabbled in both but still can't decide? Grow a pair of either, pansy.