Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Stanford is killing it.
Comments
-
Not saying they are doing bad. Clearly they identify a specific type of a player and develop him into their system. It seems to be working.FremontTroll said:
Would you think more highly of their class if they took 4* Bisharat over 2* Maddox? They had their choice and preferred Maddox.pat_hm said:An average star rating of 3.28 seems a bit underwhelming coming off a rose bowl plunger victory vs mighty Iowa.
They have an identity. They are getting their pick of players nationwide that fit that identity. They are kicking ass.
However I think its funny that everyone is sucking Shaw's dick over a class that averages 3.28 stars but if Petersen had just came off a Rose Bowl victory and pulled the same type of class everyone would be destroying him. I'm still not a huge believer in Shaw as a head coach but I have to give him the benefit of the doubt re: recruiting given their on the field performance during his time as HC. -
Holy strawman, batman! That is an absolutely ludicrous comparison. CCCP coming off a Rose Bowl win would be a god who could do no wrong.pat_hm said:
Not saying they are doing bad. Clearly they identify a specific type of a player and develop him into their system. It seems to be working.FremontTroll said:
Would you think more highly of their class if they took 4* Bisharat over 2* Maddox? They had their choice and preferred Maddox.pat_hm said:An average star rating of 3.28 seems a bit underwhelming coming off a rose bowl plunger victory vs mighty Iowa.
They have an identity. They are getting their pick of players nationwide that fit that identity. They are kicking ass.
However I think its funny that everyone is sucking Shaw's dick over a class that averages 3.28 stars but if Petersen had just came off a Rose Bowl victory and pulled the same type of class everyone would be destroying him. I'm still not a huge believer in Shaw as a head coach but I have to give him the benefit of the doubt re: recruiting given their on the field performance during his time as HC.
54-14, 36-9. 4 top ten finishes in 5 years. What can he do to make you a believer? Winners win. Shaw has proven everyone wrong- he is a winner. -
His first year he inherited Andrew Luck. Petersen inherited Cyler Miles and Lindquist. His rose bowl victories have been against an 8-5 lame duck Wisconsin team coached by the athletic director and Iowa. Sorry but I'm not a big Iowa guy. He was 8-5 last season with Hogan. He's a good coach. Never said he wasn't. In general he beats who he is supposed to beat. But I don't consider him elite.FremontTroll said:
Holy strawman, batman! That is an absolutely ludicrous comparison. CCCP coming off a Rose Bowl win would be a god who could do no wrong.pat_hm said:
Not saying they are doing bad. Clearly they identify a specific type of a player and develop him into their system. It seems to be working.FremontTroll said:
Would you think more highly of their class if they took 4* Bisharat over 2* Maddox? They had their choice and preferred Maddox.pat_hm said:An average star rating of 3.28 seems a bit underwhelming coming off a rose bowl plunger victory vs mighty Iowa.
They have an identity. They are getting their pick of players nationwide that fit that identity. They are kicking ass.
However I think its funny that everyone is sucking Shaw's dick over a class that averages 3.28 stars but if Petersen had just came off a Rose Bowl victory and pulled the same type of class everyone would be destroying him. I'm still not a huge believer in Shaw as a head coach but I have to give him the benefit of the doubt re: recruiting given their on the field performance during his time as HC.
54-14, 36-9. 4 top ten finishes in 5 years. What can he do to make you a believer? Winners win. Shaw has proven everyone wrong- he is a winner. -
He's won the conference three out of five years and made a BCS Bowl in four out of five years. That's elite. I would bet a lot of money Petersen will never do that and I'm on the doog train the next two years.pat_hm said:
His first year he inherited Andrew Luck. Petersen inherited Cyler Miles and Lindquist. His rose bowl victories have been against an 8-5 lame duck Wisconsin team coached by the athletic director and Iowa. Sorry but I'm not a big Iowa guy. He was 8-5 last season with Hogan. He's a good coach. Never said he wasn't. In general he beats who he is supposed to beat. But I don't consider him elite.FremontTroll said:
Holy strawman, batman! That is an absolutely ludicrous comparison. CCCP coming off a Rose Bowl win would be a god who could do no wrong.pat_hm said:
Not saying they are doing bad. Clearly they identify a specific type of a player and develop him into their system. It seems to be working.FremontTroll said:
Would you think more highly of their class if they took 4* Bisharat over 2* Maddox? They had their choice and preferred Maddox.pat_hm said:An average star rating of 3.28 seems a bit underwhelming coming off a rose bowl plunger victory vs mighty Iowa.
They have an identity. They are getting their pick of players nationwide that fit that identity. They are kicking ass.
However I think its funny that everyone is sucking Shaw's dick over a class that averages 3.28 stars but if Petersen had just came off a Rose Bowl victory and pulled the same type of class everyone would be destroying him. I'm still not a huge believer in Shaw as a head coach but I have to give him the benefit of the doubt re: recruiting given their on the field performance during his time as HC.
54-14, 36-9. 4 top ten finishes in 5 years. What can he do to make you a believer? Winners win. Shaw has proven everyone wrong- he is a winner. -
Actually I think he always shits a game against a team he should beat, which is what kept him out of multiple playoff appearances. Northwestern, USC, UW... That alone keeps him from being a top tier coach, but he is very good and right on the tier below Saban/Meyer.pat_hm said:
His first year he inherited Andrew Luck. Petersen inherited Cyler Miles and Lindquist. His rose bowl victories have been against an 8-5 lame duck Wisconsin team coached by the athletic director and Iowa. Sorry but I'm not a big Iowa guy. He was 8-5 last season with Hogan. He's a good coach. Never said he wasn't. In general he beats who he is supposed to beat. But I don't consider him elite.FremontTroll said:
Holy strawman, batman! That is an absolutely ludicrous comparison. CCCP coming off a Rose Bowl win would be a god who could do no wrong.pat_hm said:
Not saying they are doing bad. Clearly they identify a specific type of a player and develop him into their system. It seems to be working.FremontTroll said:
Would you think more highly of their class if they took 4* Bisharat over 2* Maddox? They had their choice and preferred Maddox.pat_hm said:An average star rating of 3.28 seems a bit underwhelming coming off a rose bowl plunger victory vs mighty Iowa.
They have an identity. They are getting their pick of players nationwide that fit that identity. They are kicking ass.
However I think its funny that everyone is sucking Shaw's dick over a class that averages 3.28 stars but if Petersen had just came off a Rose Bowl victory and pulled the same type of class everyone would be destroying him. I'm still not a huge believer in Shaw as a head coach but I have to give him the benefit of the doubt re: recruiting given their on the field performance during his time as HC.
54-14, 36-9. 4 top ten finishes in 5 years. What can he do to make you a believer? Winners win. Shaw has proven everyone wrong- he is a winner. -
Why do you keep talking about CP? We are discussing Shaw.pat_hm said:
His first year he inherited Andrew Luck. Petersen inherited Cyler Miles and Lindquist. His rose bowl victories have been against an 8-5 lame duck Wisconsin team coached by the athletic director and Iowa. Sorry but I'm not a big Iowa guy. He was 8-5 last season with Hogan. He's a good coach. Never said he wasn't. In general he beats who he is supposed to beat. But I don't consider him elite.FremontTroll said:
Holy strawman, batman! That is an absolutely ludicrous comparison. CCCP coming off a Rose Bowl win would be a god who could do no wrong.pat_hm said:
Not saying they are doing bad. Clearly they identify a specific type of a player and develop him into their system. It seems to be working.FremontTroll said:
Would you think more highly of their class if they took 4* Bisharat over 2* Maddox? They had their choice and preferred Maddox.pat_hm said:An average star rating of 3.28 seems a bit underwhelming coming off a rose bowl plunger victory vs mighty Iowa.
They have an identity. They are getting their pick of players nationwide that fit that identity. They are kicking ass.
However I think its funny that everyone is sucking Shaw's dick over a class that averages 3.28 stars but if Petersen had just came off a Rose Bowl victory and pulled the same type of class everyone would be destroying him. I'm still not a huge believer in Shaw as a head coach but I have to give him the benefit of the doubt re: recruiting given their on the field performance during his time as HC.
54-14, 36-9. 4 top ten finishes in 5 years. What can he do to make you a believer? Winners win. Shaw has proven everyone wrong- he is a winner.
Shaw had Luck for one year. He had fricking Josh Nunes (who?) and Kevin Hogan the last four. Hogan almost grad transferred because it was questionable whether he would keep his job as a redshirt senior. Not an elite qb to say the least.
Saying that a coach "beats who he is supposed to beat" is basically a message board admission that you have no real analysis but you know that said coach hasn't won a national championship so its probably a safe but empty claim.
However Shaw is actually 6-1 straight up as an underdog of 3+ points. 4-1 as an underdog of more than a TD. Let that sink in for a minute. (If you want to bring CCCP into the discussion he is 2-8 as an underdog of 3+ points thus far. And oh, btw, that 2012 Badgers team had just put up 70 on Nebraska in the BIGCCG and hadn't lost by more than 3 points in regulation all year. Not a pushover.) -
People that rip David Shaw haven't a clue. He took a very good program and kept it very good to excellent. They may be a bit down next year. But a 10 win Season is a down year for them these days.RaceBannon said:We (?) are going to have to give Shaw his due. Is he perfect? No. But he's pretty damn good all around the job
Kind of the Black Les Miles
And He's a LOT better coach than Les Miles. -
Miles has a very good record and winner's win, but I've watched enough LSU football to realize he is one stupid motherfucker. He's also the coach of the only two loss champion.
The record is what it is though. It's pretty easy to make a case why he's a good coach. -
Miles is a borderline retard.RoadDawg55 said:Miles has a very good record and winner's win, but I've watched enough LSU football to realize he is one stupid motherfucker. He's also the coach of the only two loss champion.
The record is what it is though. It's pretty easy to make a case why he's a good coach.
But the ease of recruiting Louisiana athletes to LSU makes up for a lot of stupid.
-
First you have to get your program to the point where you blow games that cost you national titles while you are winning conference titles. That was Don James from 1977-1991.
That is Shaw now. Oregon has done better with their conference champs by losing in the final game. At least they got there!!!111!!!! But it took Oregon time to get to that point.
In arguing against fucktards like Ty and Sark we do sometimes go a bit over the top on good to great winning coaches by saying they suck. You don't want to settle and you don't want 20 years of 9-3 just because you had 15 years of Owen 12 to 7-6.
But Shaw or Miles or hopefully Petermen would be welcome here. We'd bitch and moan when they lost but overall we would regain some of our Husky Arrogance.
James would lose to fucking Navy and go to the Rose Bowl. It drove me crazy. Two straight Apple Cup losses stopped us from 4 Rose Bowls in a row.
You get pissed. You lash out. Then you get excited for the next season. Trust me, its a lot better than the shit show of this century
