Stanford is killing it.
Comments
-
POTWRaceBannon said:First you have to get your program to the point where you blow games that cost you national titles while you are winning conference titles. That was Don James from 1977-1991.
That is Shaw now. Oregon has done better with their conference champs by losing in the final game. At least they got there!!!111!!!! But it took Oregon time to get to that point.
In arguing against fucktards like Ty and Sark we do sometimes go a bit over the top on good to great winning coaches by saying they suck. You don't want to settle and you don't want 20 years of 9-3 just because you had 15 years of Owen 12 to 7-6.
But Shaw or Miles or hopefully Petermen would be welcome here. We'd bitch and moan when they lost but overall we would regain some of our Husky Arrogance.
James would lose to fucking Navy and go to the Rose Bowl. It drove me crazy. Two straight Apple Cup losses stopped us from 4 Rose Bowls in a row.
You get pissed. You lash out. Then you get excited for the next season. Trust me, its a lot better than the shit show of this century -
I want so badly to know what this feels like, Uncle Race.RaceBannon said:First you have to get your program to the point where you blow games that cost you national titles while you are winning conference titles. That was Don James from 1977-1991.
That is Shaw now. Oregon has done better with their conference champs by losing in the final game. At least they got there!!!111!!!! But it took Oregon time to get to that point.
In arguing against fucktards like Ty and Sark we do sometimes go a bit over the top on good to great winning coaches by saying they suck. You don't want to settle and you don't want 20 years of 9-3 just because you had 15 years of Owen 12 to 7-6.
But Shaw or Miles or hopefully Petermen would be welcome here. We'd bitch and moan when they lost but overall we would regain some of our Husky Arrogance.
James would lose to fucking Navy and go to the Rose Bowl. It drove me crazy. Two straight Apple Cup losses stopped us from 4 Rose Bowls in a row.
You get pissed. You lash out. Then you get excited for the next season. Trust me, its a lot better than the shit show of this century -
Awkward.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I want so badly to know what this feels like, Uncle Race.RaceBannon said:First you have to get your program to the point where you blow games that cost you national titles while you are winning conference titles. That was Don James from 1977-1991.
That is Shaw now. Oregon has done better with their conference champs by losing in the final game. At least they got there!!!111!!!! But it took Oregon time to get to that point.
In arguing against fucktards like Ty and Sark we do sometimes go a bit over the top on good to great winning coaches by saying they suck. You don't want to settle and you don't want 20 years of 9-3 just because you had 15 years of Owen 12 to 7-6.
But Shaw or Miles or hopefully Petermen would be welcome here. We'd bitch and moan when they lost but overall we would regain some of our Husky Arrogance.
James would lose to fucking Navy and go to the Rose Bowl. It drove me crazy. Two straight Apple Cup losses stopped us from 4 Rose Bowls in a row.
You get pissed. You lash out. Then you get excited for the next season. Trust me, its a lot better than the shit show of this century -
Some of us have been pro Shaw all along.RaceBannon said:We (?) are going to have to give Shaw his due. Is he perfect? No. But he's pretty damn good all around the job
Kind of the Black Les Miles
Dude's easily the best coach in the conference. Tallest midget perhaps, but that midget's getting shit done. -
How in the world people can say Shaw sucks is beyond me. All of you sound like haters. Stanford is getting it done and UW is not. There's no comparison. And they are recruiting very well regardless of what some of you think.
-
That was what I was going forMisterEm said:
Awkward.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I want so badly to know what this feels like, Uncle Race.RaceBannon said:First you have to get your program to the point where you blow games that cost you national titles while you are winning conference titles. That was Don James from 1977-1991.
That is Shaw now. Oregon has done better with their conference champs by losing in the final game. At least they got there!!!111!!!! But it took Oregon time to get to that point.
In arguing against fucktards like Ty and Sark we do sometimes go a bit over the top on good to great winning coaches by saying they suck. You don't want to settle and you don't want 20 years of 9-3 just because you had 15 years of Owen 12 to 7-6.
But Shaw or Miles or hopefully Petermen would be welcome here. We'd bitch and moan when they lost but overall we would regain some of our Husky Arrogance.
James would lose to fucking Navy and go to the Rose Bowl. It drove me crazy. Two straight Apple Cup losses stopped us from 4 Rose Bowls in a row.
You get pissed. You lash out. Then you get excited for the next season. Trust me, its a lot better than the shit show of this century -
I was a hater initially but can't argue with his results.dnc said:
Some of us have been pro Shaw all along.RaceBannon said:We (?) are going to have to give Shaw his due. Is he perfect? No. But he's pretty damn good all around the job
Kind of the Black Les Miles
Dude's easily the best coach in the conference. Tallest midget perhaps, but that midget's getting shit done. -
^^ Self-awareness awesome. Ahem, @woodchips. I mean @CollegeDoog.
-
Is there a way to both upvote and downvote the same poast?pat_hm said:
Not saying they are doing bad. Clearly they identify a specific type of a player and develop him into their system. It seems to be working.FremontTroll said:
Would you think more highly of their class if they took 4* Bisharat over 2* Maddox? They had their choice and preferred Maddox.pat_hm said:An average star rating of 3.28 seems a bit underwhelming coming off a rose bowl plunger victory vs mighty Iowa.
They have an identity. They are getting their pick of players nationwide that fit that identity. They are kicking ass.
However I think its funny that everyone is sucking Shaw's dick over a class that averages 3.28 stars but if Petersen had just came off a Rose Bowl victory and pulled the same type of class everyone would be destroying him. I'm still not a huge believer in Shaw as a head coach but I have to give him the benefit of the doubt re: recruiting given their on the field performance during his time as HC. -
He's a damn good coach but it's far from calling him tallest midget. There is one Saban, one Urb and one Harbaugh. That's it. And people act like anything below that is unacceptable. So the Pac12 doesn't have 1 of those 3 coaches. But in order, the pirate is an upgrade over Wulff, Peterman an upgrade over bark for sark. The beavs, a wash. Oregon, a downgrade. Cal, a downgrade/wash, SC a wash, UCLA an upgrade, ASU an upgrade, UofA an upgrade, Colorada slight upgrade but still a dreck, and Whittingham is a damn good coach.dnc said:
Some of us have been pro Shaw all along.RaceBannon said:We (?) are going to have to give Shaw his due. Is he perfect? No. But he's pretty damn good all around the job
Kind of the Black Les Miles
Dude's easily the best coach in the conference. Tallest midget perhaps, but that midget's getting shit done.
