Matt Calkins: Why the Huskies need Lorenzo Romar
Comments
-
And there you have it. He gets great recruits (true), and has gotten 13 players to the NBA (true). I look at both of those facts as more of indictment of him then a positive. Name one coach who put 13 players in the NBA in a 12 year span and only managed to even make the dance at a .500 clip?
I know this year recruiting class isn't a Kentucky class, but it isn't in a different solar system from one of theirs either. Number 6 in the nation. Think Coach K or Calipari would have lost to Santa Barbara with this team?
Izzo would have had a couple Final Fours with the teams Romar has had...and made the dance like 10 out of twelve years. I firmly believe that.
Fire Romar. -
Sickening article. Par for the ST course I guess.
-
For all the same reasons Oregon should have kept Ernesto
-
I don't think that the writer had a single tangible thought in the entire article ...
For those that use the whole "what was the program before Romar" argument in looking at relevance ... how many people are showing up to watch the games now? In other words, they aren't relevant now. So what Romar has really done is taken a program from irrelevant, made it somewhat relevant, pushed his chips into the middle for one and done guys, failed, and now has turned the program relatively irrelevant again. -
Sounds like Petersen, minus the "somewhat relevant" moment...Tequilla said:I don't think that the writer had a single tangible thought in the entire article ...
For those that use the whole "what was the program before Romar" argument in looking at relevance ... how many people are showing up to watch the games now? In other words, they aren't relevant now. So what Romar has really done is taken a program from irrelevant, made it somewhat relevant, pushed his chips into the middle for one and done guys, failed, and now has turned the program relatively irrelevant again. -
I honestly can't tell if you're trying to be colin coherd fucking retarded and annoying or honestly believe romar has any business being a head coach at UW.ThomasFremont said:
Sounds like Petersen, minus the "somewhat relevant" moment...Tequilla said:I don't think that the writer had a single tangible thought in the entire article ...
For those that use the whole "what was the program before Romar" argument in looking at relevance ... how many people are showing up to watch the games now? In other words, they aren't relevant now. So what Romar has really done is taken a program from irrelevant, made it somewhat relevant, pushed his chips into the middle for one and done guys, failed, and now has turned the program relatively irrelevant again.
Either way, tip of the cap. -
And just in the event you're being half serious, CP has put more guys in the nfl than most elite programs and actually won more BCS games than 95% of elite top 5 conference programs. I'll be the first to say I have no fucing clue if he makes it at UW, but to even place romar on CP's level is an embarrassment to CP. At least he has taken a lot less talent, made it better and actually won games. Where as Romar has taken far superior talent, middled or worse, and won nothing resembling a big game in his career.ThomasFremont said:
Sounds like Petersen, minus the "somewhat relevant" moment...Tequilla said:I don't think that the writer had a single tangible thought in the entire article ...
For those that use the whole "what was the program before Romar" argument in looking at relevance ... how many people are showing up to watch the games now? In other words, they aren't relevant now. So what Romar has really done is taken a program from irrelevant, made it somewhat relevant, pushed his chips into the middle for one and done guys, failed, and now has turned the program relatively irrelevant again. -
So what you're saying is they hired the white Jerry Brewer? Unpossible.
-
Romar has put a lot of players into the NBA relative to most power 5 programs. Now you are saying having had NFL talent makes Pete good. But that was listed earlier as a reason why Romar sucks. Can't have it both ways.FreeChavez said:
And just in the event you're being half serious, CP has put more guys in the nfl than most elite programs and actually won more BCS games than 95% of elite top 5 conference programs. I'll be the first to say I have no fucing clue if he makes it at UW, but to even place romar on CP's level is an embarrassment to CP. At least he has taken a lot less talent, made it better and actually won games. Where as Romar has taken far superior talent, middled or worse, and won nothing resembling a big game in his career.ThomasFremont said:
Sounds like Petersen, minus the "somewhat relevant" moment...Tequilla said:I don't think that the writer had a single tangible thought in the entire article ...
For those that use the whole "what was the program before Romar" argument in looking at relevance ... how many people are showing up to watch the games now? In other words, they aren't relevant now. So what Romar has really done is taken a program from irrelevant, made it somewhat relevant, pushed his chips into the middle for one and done guys, failed, and now has turned the program relatively irrelevant again.
Nobody fucking cares what Pete did at Boise junior college anymore. So far he is a total failure at UW. However, Romar has had some highlights at the Pac-12 level (conference championships, tournament runs). Levels of success Pete hasn't even sniffed while coaching at the big boy table.
That is pretty fucking sad when you think about it. Romar is better than Petersen. And Romar should be coaching at some private 1A church high school at best.
But, as always, I support coach Romar. -
Dude, you're seriously high. Romar putting guys in the nba means dick for UW when it doesn't produce results. CP has put players in the nfl AND produced results such as BCS wins, wins against oregon, etc. Romar has never won any than a round of 32 game with all the talent he has.ThomasFremont said:
Romar has put a lot of players into the NBA relative to most power 5 programs. Now you are saying having had NFL talent makes Pete good. But that was listed earlier as a reason why Romar sucks. Can't have it both ways.FreeChavez said:
And just in the event you're being half serious, CP has put more guys in the nfl than most elite programs and actually won more BCS games than 95% of elite top 5 conference programs. I'll be the first to say I have no fucing clue if he makes it at UW, but to even place romar on CP's level is an embarrassment to CP. At least he has taken a lot less talent, made it better and actually won games. Where as Romar has taken far superior talent, middled or worse, and won nothing resembling a big game in his career.ThomasFremont said:
Sounds like Petersen, minus the "somewhat relevant" moment...Tequilla said:I don't think that the writer had a single tangible thought in the entire article ...
For those that use the whole "what was the program before Romar" argument in looking at relevance ... how many people are showing up to watch the games now? In other words, they aren't relevant now. So what Romar has really done is taken a program from irrelevant, made it somewhat relevant, pushed his chips into the middle for one and done guys, failed, and now has turned the program relatively irrelevant again.
Nobody fucking cares what Pete did at Boise junior college anymore. So far he is a total failure at UW. However, Romar has had some highlights at the Pac-12 level (conference championships, tournament runs). Levels of success Pete hasn't even sniffed while coaching at the big boy table.
That is pretty fucking sad when you think about it. Romar is better than Petersen. And Romar should be coaching at some private 1A church high school at best.
But, as always, I support coach Romar.
Romar is in year fucking 13 at UW and has missed a 68 team post season 4 years running(this will be his 5th this year), with all the talent he's had. CP has made bowls and was left a frat house with no QB's on the roster that should be in the pac12.
Sure, comparing year 3 and year 14 is apples and apples, especially when you consider how hard it is to turn a football program vs it a bball program.
You're right, i'm glad you are the lone doog left who supports a shitcan losing product.
