Southern Miss WAREAGLE Forum

They're giving UW more respect than it deserves. Just goes to show how far the SEC has fallen.

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

ApostleofGrief said:

I know I quit posting here, but I have to say I took a look at that thread and it deteriorated rapidly. It starts off fine, and then some huskyfan gets told to fuck his sister or such.

Well, I don't see the point of these SEC is not as good as PAC arguments. If they won't let the two play in playoffs, how can we know?

The south is biased in the polls as we can all see. For one thing there are 3 southern teams and MSU in the "playoffs." Condoleeza rice and Coach Willingham are black and they put this together. Sorry for the racist crap, but I don't think they think those stanford white guys can beat all our southern black guys.

Serious question: WTH are you talking about? I was nice and didn't flag it since it wasn't about PLU playing Reed College in transvestite flag football this time.

oklahoma, clemson, alabama, all southern teams... oklahoma not the deep south but still ~southern? the committee is not biased towards the south? Stanford plays a lot of white guys, the southern teams have almost all black guys? Stanford not seen as competitive against these teams?
Where did my reasoning go wrong?

WilburHooksHands said:

PurpleBaze said:

Here's another thread:

http://eaglepost.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=363

WE?

"USM will actually beat them by 20+. We will have over 200 on the ground and 350 in the passing game. Defensive will get us points and one special team play for a turnover.
Peterson will be on the hot seat after this game going into his 3rd season.

USM 51
Washington 27"

The way we came out for the last bowl game he's probably not wrong.

Had the exact same reaction

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

ApostleofGrief said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

ApostleofGrief said:

I know I quit posting here, but I have to say I took a look at that thread and it deteriorated rapidly. It starts off fine, and then some huskyfan gets told to fuck his sister or such.

Well, I don't see the point of these SEC is not as good as PAC arguments. If they won't let the two play in playoffs, how can we know?

The south is biased in the polls as we can all see. For one thing there are 3 southern teams and MSU in the "playoffs." Condoleeza rice and Coach Willingham are black and they put this together. Sorry for the racist crap, but I don't think they think those stanford white guys can beat all our southern black guys.

Serious question: WTH are you talking about? I was nice and didn't flag it since it wasn't about PLU playing Reed College in transvestite flag football this time.

oklahoma, clemson, alabama, all southern teams... oklahoma not the deep south but still ~southern? the committee is not biased towards the south? Stanford plays a lot of white guys, the southern teams have almost all black guys? Stanford not seen as competitive against these teams?
Where did my reasoning go wrong?

Stanfraud lost too many times.

But the SEC bias has been alive and well for many years, you're correct in that respect.

I think there's a subconscious bias against McCaffery because he's white.

Well, it's insane to say the winner of the pac-12 is not good enough to play for the "national championship." I think there is a bias too against McCaffery, seriously.