Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Huh, kinda remember puppy picking USC to win south

24

Comments

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    6-3 is always special. Enjoy the beat down from Stanford in Padadena.
  • BlueDevil
    BlueDevil Member Posts: 9

    ...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.

    Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,515 Founders Club
    BlueDevil said:

    ...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.

    Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?
    I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Someone needs to stand up for the best conference in the land (pac12).
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
    I TROLLIG PPUPY!!!!!!!!1
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Doogles said:

    Picking USC to win the South was hardly a dark horse pick. They were the media darling to win the conference. I can't remember what I said, but if i recall It was UCLA's to lose depending on whether Rosen could produce and they could stay healthy upfront and that USC would have by far the most talent but the Sark effect would keep the door open longer than it should.

    Rosen produced just enough to give them a chance, but UCLA lost their best player at each level of the defense and couldn't pull it out. USC lost Sark and had the new coach bump. It worked out perfectly for the Trojans, quite honestly.

    Uh, none of you limber wrists did. So yes, it wa s a darkhorse