Picking USC to win the South was hardly a dark horse pick. They were the media darling to win the conference. I can't remember what I said, but if i recall It was UCLA's to lose depending on whether Rosen could produce and they could stay healthy upfront and that USC would have by far the most talent but the Sark effect would keep the door open longer than it should.
Rosen produced just enough to give them a chance, but UCLA lost their best player at each level of the defense and couldn't pull it out. USC lost Sark and had the new coach bump. It worked out perfectly for the Trojans, quite honestly.
Uh, none of you limber wrists did. So yes, it wa s a darkhorse
...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.
...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.
You don't actually watch games. You're fucking retarded.
...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.
You don't actually watch games. You're fucking retarded.
Listening to Bill in Tukwila talk about the 3rd string left Tackle's footwork > listening to a dumb fuck on a message board talk about his/her prognostications.
...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.
Picking USC to win the South was hardly a dark horse pick. They were the media darling to win the conference. I can't remember what I said, but if i recall It was UCLA's to lose depending on whether Rosen could produce and they could stay healthy upfront and that USC would have by far the most talent but the Sark effect would keep the door open longer than it should.
Rosen produced just enough to give them a chance, but UCLA lost their best player at each level of the defense and couldn't pull it out. USC lost Sark and had the new coach bump. It worked out perfectly for the Trojans, quite honestly.
Uh, none of you limber wrists did. So yes, it wa s a darkhorse
Funny that you disappeared until now, you must have gone for a slow roll to get perspective.
Comments
pac-12.com/article/2015/07/30/usc-football-chosen-win-pac-12-preseason-media-poll
pacifictakes.com/2015/8/17/9119269/final-2015-pac-12-predictions-oregon-takes-the-north-usc-the-south
"...no drop-off with Bender. Did you watch him come in when Falk went down?"