Huh, kinda remember puppy picking USC to win south
Here yee, here yee, put your hands together for Puppy. For most of you joining hands is comfortable and of sexual empowerment. Now go pull each others puds while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
Tommy, J, Em, been kinda silent. Now that the football has been played and you're tired from black friday shopping with your buttsniffing lovers, you can join in the conversation about everything non-football related as you so often do. Did you spray the mirrors down in the changing rooms before your departure?
Comments
-
-
How did you like the last place SEC East team hanging around with the #1 team in the nation today?
-
Hale puppito!
-
You've mentioned buttsniffing in your last 100 or so posts.
-
99% sure your posts referencing Sark winning the south. At last check, only thing he's currently winning is the Saturday night UNO game at Betty Ford's ultra posh LA resort.
-
Just shush your hole. Why u so full of hate?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Whats new. The master prognosticator just doin his thang, embarrassing you boofs, draggin ya'll through the long season, making u look stupid on a weekly basis.
Here yee, here yee, put your hands together for Puppy. For most of you joining hands is comfortable and of sexual empowerment. Now go pull each others puds while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
Tommy, J, Em, been kinda silent. Now that the football has been played and you're tired from black friday shopping with your buttsniffing lovers, you can join in the conversation about everything non-football related as you so often do. Did you spray the mirrors down in the changing rooms before your departure? -
Dux say rivalry gaymes r like thatPurpleJ said:How did you like the last place SEC East team hanging around with the #1 team in the nation today?
-
Picking USC to win the South was hardly a dark horse pick. They were the media darling to win the conference. I can't remember what I said, but if i recall It was UCLA's to lose depending on whether Rosen could produce and they could stay healthy upfront and that USC would have by far the most talent but the Sark effect would keep the door open longer than it should.
Rosen produced just enough to give them a chance, but UCLA lost their best player at each level of the defense and couldn't pull it out. USC lost Sark and had the new coach bump. It worked out perfectly for the Trojans, quite honestly. -
Fuck off Puppy ...
Anybody that was picking against USC winning the South was picking against Seven to win the South because everybody knew what kind of walking disaster he was. That turned out to be true. And they don't win the South if he was the HC the entire season. FACT.
Now, if before the season we were looking at USC without an alcoholic panty chasing/sniffing coach at the helm, then I would expect most people to say that SC would have won the South.
-
Nice call puppy. However, Patron should get the assist. The reason most here including myself said USC wouldn't win it gave Sark as the reason. Sark then drinks himself out of the job, and USC goes on a run. Go figure...
-
6-3 is always special. Enjoy the beat down from Stanford in Padadena.
-
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
-
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.BlueDevil said:
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
-
Number of times Puppy says Sark: 4puppylove_sugarsteel said:Anyone still think Sark and his SENIOR won't win the conference?
Since Senior qb's dont matter to most of you dumb fucks, which team and their freshman,sophomore or true junior QB is going to beat them? ASU with their SENIOR QB has a chance at home, Vernon Adams, a senior, has a chance...
Told you fuckerds Sark would win the South soon after taking job. Anyone still want to doubt Puppy your lord next year? I called Stanford/UO vs Usc for title after the season ended. Sark beats Oregon in a rematch, after losing to UO late in November on the road, to win the conference.
Number of times Puppy says USC: 1
Does that mean Puppy is wrong 4 times and right only 1?
Will we only remember the times Puppy is wrong? -
Puppy good at everything.whatshouldicareabout said:
Number of times Puppy says Sark: 4puppylove_sugarsteel said:Anyone still think Sark and his SENIOR won't win the conference?
Since Senior qb's dont matter to most of you dumb fucks, which team and their freshman,sophomore or true junior QB is going to beat them? ASU with their SENIOR QB has a chance at home, Vernon Adams, a senior, has a chance...
Told you fuckerds Sark would win the South soon after taking job. Anyone still want to doubt Puppy your lord next year? I called Stanford/UO vs Usc for title after the season ended. Sark beats Oregon in a rematch, after losing to UO late in November on the road, to win the conference.
Number of times Puppy says USC: 1
Does that mean Puppy is wrong 4 times and right only 1?
Will we only remember the times Puppy is wrong? -
-
TERRIBLE! You picked Seven to win the South, the fact he had to get fired for USC to win and then popped off just raises your fucktardedness level.
-
Someone needs to stand up for the best conference in the land (pac12).
-
I TROLLIG PPUPY!!!!!!!!1
-
Uh, none of you limber wrists did. So yes, it wa s a darkhorseDoogles said:Picking USC to win the South was hardly a dark horse pick. They were the media darling to win the conference. I can't remember what I said, but if i recall It was UCLA's to lose depending on whether Rosen could produce and they could stay healthy upfront and that USC would have by far the most talent but the Sark effect would keep the door open longer than it should.
Rosen produced just enough to give them a chance, but UCLA lost their best player at each level of the defense and couldn't pull it out. USC lost Sark and had the new coach bump. It worked out perfectly for the Trojans, quite honestly. -
Its good to be the king!SteveInShelton said:TERRIBLE! You picked Seven to win the South, the fact he had to get fired for USC to win and then popped off just raises your fucktardedness level.
-
Yup, total dark horse (no racist crap!)puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Uh, none of you limber wrists did. So yes, it wa s a darkhorseDoogles said:Picking USC to win the South was hardly a dark horse pick. They were the media darling to win the conference. I can't remember what I said, but if i recall It was UCLA's to lose depending on whether Rosen could produce and they could stay healthy upfront and that USC would have by far the most talent but the Sark effect would keep the door open longer than it should.
Rosen produced just enough to give them a chance, but UCLA lost their best player at each level of the defense and couldn't pull it out. USC lost Sark and had the new coach bump. It worked out perfectly for the Trojans, quite honestly.
pac-12.com/article/2015/07/30/usc-football-chosen-win-pac-12-preseason-media-poll
pacifictakes.com/2015/8/17/9119269/final-2015-pac-12-predictions-oregon-takes-the-north-usc-the-south -
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.pawz said:
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.BlueDevil said:
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
-
You don't actually watch games. You're fucking retarded.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.pawz said:
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.BlueDevil said:
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
-
King doogpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Its good to be the king!SteveInShelton said:TERRIBLE! You picked Seven to win the South, the fact he had to get fired for USC to win and then popped off just raises your fucktardedness level.
-
Mentally-handicapped-American, please.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You don't actually watch games. You're fucking retarded.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.pawz said:
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.BlueDevil said:
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
-
Listening to Bill in Tukwila talk about the 3rd string left Tackle's footwork > listening to a dumb fuck on a message board talk about his/her prognostications.
-
I thought Clemson was going to roll over NC.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.pawz said:
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.BlueDevil said:
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
-
Funny that you disappeared until now, you must have gone for a slow roll to get perspective.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Uh, none of you limber wrists did. So yes, it wa s a darkhorseDoogles said:Picking USC to win the South was hardly a dark horse pick. They were the media darling to win the conference. I can't remember what I said, but if i recall It was UCLA's to lose depending on whether Rosen could produce and they could stay healthy upfront and that USC would have by far the most talent but the Sark effect would keep the door open longer than it should.
Rosen produced just enough to give them a chance, but UCLA lost their best player at each level of the defense and couldn't pull it out. USC lost Sark and had the new coach bump. It worked out perfectly for the Trojans, quite honestly. -
Sort of like the "researched" scouting report from last week...puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trendingpawz said:
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.BlueDevil said:
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
"...no drop-off with Bender. Did you watch him come in when Falk went down?"
