Huh, kinda remember puppy picking USC to win south
Comments
-
Its good to be the king!SteveInShelton said:TERRIBLE! You picked Seven to win the South, the fact he had to get fired for USC to win and then popped off just raises your fucktardedness level.
-
Yup, total dark horse (no racist crap!)puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Uh, none of you limber wrists did. So yes, it wa s a darkhorseDoogles said:Picking USC to win the South was hardly a dark horse pick. They were the media darling to win the conference. I can't remember what I said, but if i recall It was UCLA's to lose depending on whether Rosen could produce and they could stay healthy upfront and that USC would have by far the most talent but the Sark effect would keep the door open longer than it should.
Rosen produced just enough to give them a chance, but UCLA lost their best player at each level of the defense and couldn't pull it out. USC lost Sark and had the new coach bump. It worked out perfectly for the Trojans, quite honestly.
pac-12.com/article/2015/07/30/usc-football-chosen-win-pac-12-preseason-media-poll
pacifictakes.com/2015/8/17/9119269/final-2015-pac-12-predictions-oregon-takes-the-north-usc-the-south -
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.pawz said:
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.BlueDevil said:
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
-
You don't actually watch games. You're fucking retarded.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.pawz said:
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.BlueDevil said:
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
-
King doogpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Its good to be the king!SteveInShelton said:TERRIBLE! You picked Seven to win the South, the fact he had to get fired for USC to win and then popped off just raises your fucktardedness level.
-
Mentally-handicapped-American, please.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
You don't actually watch games. You're fucking retarded.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.pawz said:
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.BlueDevil said:
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
-
Listening to Bill in Tukwila talk about the 3rd string left Tackle's footwork > listening to a dumb fuck on a message board talk about his/her prognostications.
-
I thought Clemson was going to roll over NC.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trending. NC been trending. Marquise Williams is a fucking baller. They have tall, high leaping studs at WR. Defense meh, but enough to win. A TON of pressure on Clemson.pawz said:
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.BlueDevil said:
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
-
Funny that you disappeared until now, you must have gone for a slow roll to get perspective.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Uh, none of you limber wrists did. So yes, it wa s a darkhorseDoogles said:Picking USC to win the South was hardly a dark horse pick. They were the media darling to win the conference. I can't remember what I said, but if i recall It was UCLA's to lose depending on whether Rosen could produce and they could stay healthy upfront and that USC would have by far the most talent but the Sark effect would keep the door open longer than it should.
Rosen produced just enough to give them a chance, but UCLA lost their best player at each level of the defense and couldn't pull it out. USC lost Sark and had the new coach bump. It worked out perfectly for the Trojans, quite honestly. -
Sort of like the "researched" scouting report from last week...puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Heels very much a serious foe for Clemson. Been tooting their horn for 6 weeks. When you actually watch games you notice teams trendingpawz said:
I'm rooting for the Tar Heels to win this one rather easily, say 34-17.BlueDevil said:
Who do you think will win the upcoming bowl game matching Duke against your crimson and grey Huskies?puppylove_sugarsteel said:...while puppy calculates all his winning from the day.
"...no drop-off with Bender. Did you watch him come in when Falk went down?"
