This weeks committee head scratcher...
Comments
-
Like poster YoBates I have known Puppy since he was a punk jr high kid with hair Trey Adams would admire.
-
RoadHarv55...I'm still laughingPurpleJ said:
AGREEdnc said:
If we're gonna bash upvoting your own alts with your other alts, I'm out!doogsinparadise said:Not only does Pup have a fake account, but he uses a third account to upvote his primary fake.
-
Hey snatches, im not steel2. Think derek could confirm that
-
Derek's silence speaks volumes
-
Puppys top 4steelheader2 said:Puppy's top 4
1 iron Maiden
2 Judas Priest
3 black Sabbath
4. Queensryche
Oh u meant his playoff teams.
1. The band
2. Christopher Parkening
3. JH
4. Menace
4. -
PGOS wtf vote speaks volumes.PurpleJ said:
AGREEdnc said:
If we're gonna bash upvoting your own alts with your other alts, I'm out!doogsinparadise said:Not only does Pup have a fake account, but he uses a third account to upvote his primary fake.
-
Pup doesnt hang around this craptrap like you fags. upvoting himself is hardly his style. 1 handle is all I need to make you pillow chewers look foolish and fucktarded as you are. Enough with that shit. Derek? I got a cred to protect!!doogsinparadise said:Not only does Pup have a fake account, but he uses a third account to upvote his primary fake.
-
Troll Toll best handlePurpleJ said:
AGREEdnc said:
If we're gonna bash upvoting your own alts with your other alts, I'm out!doogsinparadise said:Not only does Pup have a fake account, but he uses a third account to upvote his primary fake.
-
I'm reporting you to the police.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Pup doesnt hang around this craptrap like you fags. upvoting himself is hardly his style. 1 handle is all I need to make you pillow chewers look foolish and fucktarded as you are. Enough with that shit. Derek? I got a cred to protect!!doogsinparadise said:Not only does Pup have a fake account, but he uses a third account to upvote his primary fake.
-
I get that, but college football doesn't have a lot of games, and people will always cling to wins and losses with records like 12-1 and 13-0, and rightfully so. Imagine if the NFL went to SRS or a mathematical formula for its playoff system. It wouldn't sit well.dnc said:
SRS attempts to measure how good a team is, not who has the best record. We all understand it's different intuitively (which is why no one would bat an eyelash when Bama comes out -10 versus an undefeated Iowa in that hypothetical matchup), but for some reason CFB fans cling to this outdated idea that the best way to measure teams is who has the least losses.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
This will look like my anti-SECness coming out, because it is, but why are they ahead of all these undefeated teams in SRS? Wins and losses are the most important factor.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Alabama should be #1. They are #1 in SRS, the most objective measure. They'd beat all but a few teams rather easily.
Sure, they probably beat Iowa by 10 on a neutral field, but Iowa hasn't lost.
Bama would be favored against anyone in the country, because they have the best team. In this case, SRS >>>> playoff committee >>>> poles.
Ole Miss isn't a great team. Alabama should've taken care of business at home. -
#MyIrish
-
The wtf was for being a looser with 10 handles, before I saw Troll Toll and changed it to an awesomePurpleJ said:
PGOS wtf vote speaks volumes.PurpleJ said:
AGREEdnc said:
If we're gonna bash upvoting your own alts with your other alts, I'm out!doogsinparadise said:Not only does Pup have a fake account, but he uses a third account to upvote his primary fake.
-
At this point, Utah's loss at USC looks better than Bama's home loss to Ole MissFire_Marshall_Bill said:
I get that, but college football doesn't have a lot of games, and people will always cling to wins and losses with records like 12-1 and 13-0, and rightfully so. Imagine if the NFL went to SRS or a mathematical formula for its playoff system. It wouldn't sit well.dnc said:
SRS attempts to measure how good a team is, not who has the best record. We all understand it's different intuitively (which is why no one would bat an eyelash when Bama comes out -10 versus an undefeated Iowa in that hypothetical matchup), but for some reason CFB fans cling to this outdated idea that the best way to measure teams is who has the least losses.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
This will look like my anti-SECness coming out, because it is, but why are they ahead of all these undefeated teams in SRS? Wins and losses are the most important factor.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Alabama should be #1. They are #1 in SRS, the most objective measure. They'd beat all but a few teams rather easily.
Sure, they probably beat Iowa by 10 on a neutral field, but Iowa hasn't lost.
Bama would be favored against anyone in the country, because they have the best team. In this case, SRS >>>> playoff committee >>>> poles.
Ole Miss isn't a great team. Alabama should've taken care of business at home. -
Very hurtful language.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Pup doesnt hang around this craptrap like you fags. upvoting himself is hardly his style. 1 handle is all I need to make you pillow chewers look foolish and fucktarded as you are. Enough with that shit. Derek? I got a cred to protect!!doogsinparadise said:Not only does Pup have a fake account, but he uses a third account to upvote his primary fake.
-
One win over LSU >>>>>> 11 wins against temple and navy. hth
-
LSU cant complete a forward pass, neither can Saban. Pac12 teams are balanced, with efficient defenses. Bama gave up 80pts and 600yds to ole miss. All need be said.greenblood said:One win over LSU >>>>>> 11 wins against temple and navy. hth
-
You're mediocre at trolling, fuck o dear boobielips!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
LSU cant complete a forward pass, neither can Saban. Pac12 teams are balanced, with efficient defenses. Bama gave up 80pts and 600yds to ole miss. All need be said.greenblood said:One win over LSU >>>>>> 11 wins against temple and navy. hth
