Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

More PM for HondaFS

pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,242 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
The ice caps are growing .... oh god .... oh gawd!!!!

https://nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses


Yes, dickfor, NASA is my source.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,920 Founders Club
    pawz said:

    The ice caps are growing .... oh god .... oh gawd!!!!

    https://nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses


    Yes, dickfor, NASA is my source.

    You do know that the Koch Brothers help fund NASA don't you?





































    With their taxes
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

    Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Someone clearly only read the headline.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,966
    2001400ex said:

    But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

    Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

    You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

    But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

    Effin moron.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

    Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

    You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

    But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

    Effin moron.

    So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,242 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

    Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

    You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

    But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

    Effin moron.

    So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.
    'Potential' global warming is a scare tactic.

    Hope this fucking helps.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

    Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

    You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

    But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

    Effin moron.

    So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.
    'Potential' global warming is a scare tactic.

    Hope this fucking helps.
    You clearly don't get it. At all.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,242 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

    Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

    You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

    But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

    Effin moron.

    So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.
    'Potential' global warming is a scare tactic.

    Hope this fucking helps.
    You clearly don't get it. At all.
    Of you say so.








    Or we could take a vote. Your call.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    There have been numerous polls of the worlds climate scientists and meteorologists and its overwhelming that you are wrong.

    But keep believing politicians and journalists, they are clearly more educated.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

    Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

    You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

    But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

    Effin moron.

    So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.
    Ahhhh yes, right out of the Libtard Manifesto.

    Do the world a favor. Eliminate your carbon footprint.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    2001400ex said:

    There have been numerous polls of the worlds climate scientists and meteorologists and its overwhelming that you are wrong.

    But keep believing politicians and journalists, they are clearly more educated.

    Yes, I like to resort to polling researchers disparate for grants... when the actual science doesn't back my pre-determined outcome.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

    Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

    You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

    But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

    Effin moron.

    So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.
    Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    sarktastic said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

    Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

    You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

    But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

    Effin moron.

    So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.
    Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.
    It's clear you don't see the irony.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 20,242 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    sarktastic said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

    Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

    You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

    But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

    Effin moron.

    So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.
    Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.
    It's clear you don't see the irony.
    Speaking of irony, why do you hate NASA?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,619 Founders Club
    Not mentioned: The Arctic ice has been rapidly decreasing since about 1980.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    pawz said:

    2001400ex said:

    sarktastic said:

    2001400ex said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    2001400ex said:

    But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”

    Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?

    You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?

    But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...

    Effin moron.

    So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.
    Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.
    It's clear you don't see the irony.
    Speaking of irony, why do you hate NASA?
    Why do you hate reading for comprehension?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.