More PM for HondaFS
https://nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
Yes, dickfor, NASA is my source.
Comments
-
You do know that the Koch Brothers help fund NASA don't you?pawz said:The ice caps are growing .... oh god .... oh gawd!!!!
https://nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses
Yes, dickfor, NASA is my source.
With their taxes -
But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula? -
Someone clearly only read the headline.
-
You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?2001400ex said:But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?
But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...
Effin moron.
-
So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.HoustonHusky said:
You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?2001400ex said:But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?
But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...
Effin moron. -
'Potential' global warming is a scare tactic.2001400ex said:
So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.HoustonHusky said:
You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?2001400ex said:But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?
But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...
Effin moron.
Hope this fucking helps. -
You clearly don't get it. At all.pawz said:
'Potential' global warming is a scare tactic.2001400ex said:
So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.HoustonHusky said:
You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?2001400ex said:But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?
But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...
Effin moron.
Hope this fucking helps. -
Of you say so.2001400ex said:
You clearly don't get it. At all.pawz said:
'Potential' global warming is a scare tactic.2001400ex said:
So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.HoustonHusky said:
You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?2001400ex said:But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?
But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...
Effin moron.
Hope this fucking helps.
Or we could take a vote. Your call. -
There have been numerous polls of the worlds climate scientists and meteorologists and its overwhelming that you are wrong.
But keep believing politicians and journalists, they are clearly more educated. -
Ahhhh yes, right out of the Libtard Manifesto.2001400ex said:
So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.HoustonHusky said:
You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?2001400ex said:But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?
But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...
Effin moron.
Do the world a favor. Eliminate your carbon footprint. -
Yes, I like to resort to polling researchers disparate for grants... when the actual science doesn't back my pre-determined outcome.2001400ex said:There have been numerous polls of the worlds climate scientists and meteorologists and its overwhelming that you are wrong.
But keep believing politicians and journalists, they are clearly more educated. -
Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.2001400ex said:
So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.HoustonHusky said:
You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?2001400ex said:But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?
But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...
Effin moron. -
It's clear you don't see the irony.sarktastic said:
Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.2001400ex said:
So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.HoustonHusky said:
You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?2001400ex said:But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?
But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...
Effin moron. -
Speaking of irony, why do you hate NASA?2001400ex said:
It's clear you don't see the irony.sarktastic said:
Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.2001400ex said:
So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.HoustonHusky said:
You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?2001400ex said:But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?
But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...
Effin moron. -
Not mentioned: The Arctic ice has been rapidly decreasing since about 1980.
-
Why do you hate reading for comprehension?pawz said:
Speaking of irony, why do you hate NASA?2001400ex said:
It's clear you don't see the irony.sarktastic said:
Hey, dumbfuck. Carbon dioxide is *not* a pollutant. Your premise is fucked up again and proof you're a stooge.2001400ex said:
So let's just ignore potential global warming and let corporations pollute all they want. Why worry about these scare tactics.HoustonHusky said:
You might maybe be right in what, a few decades, if the "man-made" global warming that suppose to already be happening and already doing bad things actually starts happening and then starts actually doing bad things?2001400ex said:But it might only take a few decades for Antarctica’s growth to reverse, according to Zwally. “If the losses of the Antarctic Peninsula and parts of West Antarctica continue to increase at the same rate they’ve been increasing for the last two decades, the losses will catch up with the long-term gain in East Antarctica in 20 or 30 years -- I don’t think there will be enough snowfall increase to offset these losses.”
Why do you discriminate against the West Antarctic sheet or Antarctic peninsula?
But so far you have been absolutely wrong and from what we have seen around here pretty much wrong on everything your entire lifetime...
Effin moron.
