For those who think last night was a signature win
Comments
-
I never asked.
And some people were talking about 3-9 or 4-8 after the loss to Cal...that to me was going overboard. One posterFS also said USC would beat UW 58-10.ThomasFremont said:
So why are you asking us to say we were wrong, when we were clearly right?HFNY said:Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.
RaceBannon said:If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.
In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.
But we better fucking beat Oregon. -
huh?HFNY said:It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....
-
I expect 7-5 at least and that's more an expectation than a prediction, but I might have predicted it too. So that's 4-3. It's not expecting that much.HFNY said:Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.
RaceBannon said:If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.
In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.
But we better fucking beat Oregon.
It's Washington. 4-8 or 5-7 is bullshit. I'm not going to stoop to that level.
Smith is the main obstacle here. The youth will get experience over the year, and yeah, there will be some really fucking frustrating moments, and fans will go ballistic and the sky will fall.
-
When we went 3 and out after USC cut it to 17-12, I thought there was a good chance of losing. Then Sark called three passing plays in a row and bailed us out.RaceBannon said:
Quite honestly I thought they were going toRoadDawg55 said:
Of course this board would have went ballistic if we blew a 17-6 lead with 8 minutes left.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:It might be. We don't really know at this point. The Pac 12 (which sucks!!) doesn't really have a dominant team and everyone is going to beat up on everyone else, especially with SC and whOregon going the mediocre coach route lately. I won't hold my breath for Utah stepping up.
This board would go ballistic if they had lost. We all know that.
Offense still sucks and Mickens needs to stay wit his homies in LA, but the defense looked awesome and defense wins championships.
Praise for wins and criticism for losses. -
Huh what? Reading Comp 101 says that is a statement, not a question.ThomasFremont said:
huh?HFNY said:It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....
-
I hope you're right and Browning puts together his first good game against a Pac-12 team. I like how Lenius stepped up vs. USC and he's a mismatch against Oregon's shaky secondary.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I expect 7-5 at least and that's more an expectation than a prediction, but I might have predicted it too. So that's 4-3. It's not expecting that much.HFNY said:Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.
RaceBannon said:If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.
In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.
But we better fucking beat Oregon.
It's Washington. 4-8 or 5-7 is bullshit. I'm not going to stoop to that level.
Smith is the main obstacle here. The youth will get experience over the year, and yeah, there will be some really fucking frustrating moments, and fans will go ballistic and the sky will fall. -
I'm just damn happy we got a win over an above .500 Pac 12 foe on the road.
I don't give a fuck if anybody wants to call it "signature".
-
CHRISTHFNY said:Huh what? Reading Comp 101 says that is a statement, not a question.
ThomasFremont said:
huh?HFNY said:It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....
-
I can tell you want me to ask and I'm a nice guy so....can you admit some people went overboard on Petersen after the Cal loss, perhaps even including yourself?ThomasFremont said:
CHRISTHFNY said:Huh what? Reading Comp 101 says that is a statement, not a question.
ThomasFremont said:
huh?HFNY said:It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....
-
No, because we didn't.HFNY said:I can tell you want me to ask and I'm a nice guy so....can you admit some people went overboard on Petersen after the Cal loss, perhaps even including yourself?
ThomasFremont said:
CHRISTHFNY said:Huh what? Reading Comp 101 says that is a statement, not a question.
ThomasFremont said:
huh?HFNY said:It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....
The fact that you don't get it is sad.
