Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

For those who think last night was a signature win

2

Comments

  • BabsGilbyTawdTyBabsGilbyTawdTy Member Posts: 1,058

    Ty never really had a signature win other than Syracuse. He had signature almost wins like USC and the first half of the Oklahoma game. Fucking doogs

    Back in 2007, I think a famed ex-Dawgman sage touted Ty Willy's 24-10 victory over Boise State as such.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,458 Founders Club

    Ty never really had a signature win other than Syracuse. He had signature almost wins like USC and the first half of the Oklahoma game. Fucking doogs

    Back in 2007, I think a famed ex-Dawgman sage touted Ty Willy's 24-10 victory over Boise State as such.
    yeah probably so. Boise was coming off the Fiesta Bowl I think
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,786 Standard Supporter
    I agree with you there on all parts.

    I'm still not a fan of Babushka's but Browning will start hitting those deep throws, hopefully as soon as the Oregon game. Running game also looked more physical and it's more mature with Eldrenkamp back in and Kirkland at RT (though he has plenty of room for improvement).


    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    The offense still sucks and I've always said the defense is good. Last year was still a huge disappointment and I'm still pissed about the Cal game and Petersen/Smith being retarded and not running the ball more.
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,786 Standard Supporter
    Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.

    If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.

    In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.

    But we better fucking beat Oregon.

  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    HFNY said:

    I agree with you there on all parts.

    I'm still not a fan of Babushka's but Browning will start hitting those deep throws, hopefully as soon as the Oregon game. Running game also looked more physical and it's more mature with Eldrenkamp back in and Kirkland at RT (though he has plenty of room for improvement).


    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    The offense still sucks and I've always said the defense is good. Last year was still a huge disappointment and I'm still pissed about the Cal game and Petersen/Smith being retarded and not running the ball more.
    OL actually looked good. Kirkland was better than McGary or James have been all year at RT and Eldrenkamp played well at LG. I agree that this game could have been a lot different if Browning hit even a couple of big throws. He missed almost every one.
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,786 Standard Supporter
    That Petersen was the wrong guy only 18 games into his tenure?

    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    They might still be right though
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,849
    We get it. Everybody sucks. So even the team that wins the Natty this year should have an asterisk beside it because they were the least drecky.

    Mission accomplished.
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    HFNY said:

    Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.

    If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.

    In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.

    But we better fucking beat Oregon.

    So why are you asking us to say we were wrong, when we were clearly right?
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,786 Standard Supporter
    I never asked.

    And some people were talking about 3-9 or 4-8 after the loss to Cal...that to me was going overboard. One posterFS also said USC would beat UW 58-10.

    HFNY said:

    Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.

    If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.

    In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.

    But we better fucking beat Oregon.

    So why are you asking us to say we were wrong, when we were clearly right?
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    huh?
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,774 Founders Club
    HFNY said:

    Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.

    If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.

    In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.

    But we better fucking beat Oregon.

    I expect 7-5 at least and that's more an expectation than a prediction, but I might have predicted it too. So that's 4-3. It's not expecting that much.

    It's Washington. 4-8 or 5-7 is bullshit. I'm not going to stoop to that level.

    Smith is the main obstacle here. The youth will get experience over the year, and yeah, there will be some really fucking frustrating moments, and fans will go ballistic and the sky will fall.

  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,786 Standard Supporter
    Huh what? Reading Comp 101 says that is a statement, not a question.

    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    huh?
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,786 Standard Supporter
    I hope you're right and Browning puts together his first good game against a Pac-12 team. I like how Lenius stepped up vs. USC and he's a mismatch against Oregon's shaky secondary.

    HFNY said:

    Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.

    If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.

    In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.

    But we better fucking beat Oregon.

    I expect 7-5 at least and that's more an expectation than a prediction, but I might have predicted it too. So that's 4-3. It's not expecting that much.

    It's Washington. 4-8 or 5-7 is bullshit. I'm not going to stoop to that level.

    Smith is the main obstacle here. The youth will get experience over the year, and yeah, there will be some really fucking frustrating moments, and fans will go ballistic and the sky will fall.

  • ThumpThump Member Posts: 793
    I'm just damn happy we got a win over an above .500 Pac 12 foe on the road.

    I don't give a fuck if anybody wants to call it "signature".

  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    HFNY said:

    Huh what? Reading Comp 101 says that is a statement, not a question.

    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    huh?
    CHRIST
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,786 Standard Supporter
    I can tell you want me to ask and I'm a nice guy so....can you admit some people went overboard on Petersen after the Cal loss, perhaps even including yourself?

    HFNY said:

    Huh what? Reading Comp 101 says that is a statement, not a question.

    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    huh?
    CHRIST
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    HFNY said:

    I can tell you want me to ask and I'm a nice guy so....can you admit some people went overboard on Petersen after the Cal loss, perhaps even including yourself?

    HFNY said:

    Huh what? Reading Comp 101 says that is a statement, not a question.

    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    huh?
    CHRIST
    No, because we didn't.

    The fact that you don't get it is sad.
Sign In or Register to comment.