Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

For those who think last night was a signature win

«1

Comments

  • DontCallMeShirley
    DontCallMeShirley Member Posts: 283
    I don't even know what that term means.
  • mobey
    mobey Member Posts: 3,254
    Not a signature win but a good win and the defense looks solid.

    Remember, a very young team.
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581

    did the UW sell t-shirts commemorating the first half of the Oklahoma game?

    Would have been lacking comportment
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    section8 said:

    did the UW sell t-shirts commemorating the first half of the Oklahoma game?

    Would have been lacking comportment
    Crazy Larry vehemently disagrees.
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,390
    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    They might still be right though
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,903 Founders Club
    If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.

    In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.

    But we better fucking beat Oregon.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,629 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2015
    It might be. We don't really know at this point. The Pac 12 (which sucks!!) doesn't really have a dominant team and everyone is going to beat up on everyone else, especially with SC and whOregon going the mediocre coach route lately. I won't hold my breath for Utah stepping up.

    This board would go ballistic if they had lost. We all know that.

    Offense still sucks and Mickens needs to stay wit his homies in LA, but the defense looked awesome and defense wins championships. I'm not saying this is anything like a championship team, don't be a twister.
  • BabsGilbyTawdTy
    BabsGilbyTawdTy Member Posts: 1,058

    Ty never really had a signature win other than Syracuse. He had signature almost wins like USC and the first half of the Oklahoma game. Fucking doogs

    Back in 2007, I think a famed ex-Dawgman sage touted Ty Willy's 24-10 victory over Boise State as such.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,903 Founders Club

    Ty never really had a signature win other than Syracuse. He had signature almost wins like USC and the first half of the Oklahoma game. Fucking doogs

    Back in 2007, I think a famed ex-Dawgman sage touted Ty Willy's 24-10 victory over Boise State as such.
    yeah probably so. Boise was coming off the Fiesta Bowl I think
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,390
    I agree with you there on all parts.

    I'm still not a fan of Babushka's but Browning will start hitting those deep throws, hopefully as soon as the Oregon game. Running game also looked more physical and it's more mature with Eldrenkamp back in and Kirkland at RT (though he has plenty of room for improvement).


    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    The offense still sucks and I've always said the defense is good. Last year was still a huge disappointment and I'm still pissed about the Cal game and Petersen/Smith being retarded and not running the ball more.
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,390
    Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.

    If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.

    In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.

    But we better fucking beat Oregon.

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,137
    HFNY said:

    I agree with you there on all parts.

    I'm still not a fan of Babushka's but Browning will start hitting those deep throws, hopefully as soon as the Oregon game. Running game also looked more physical and it's more mature with Eldrenkamp back in and Kirkland at RT (though he has plenty of room for improvement).


    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    The offense still sucks and I've always said the defense is good. Last year was still a huge disappointment and I'm still pissed about the Cal game and Petersen/Smith being retarded and not running the ball more.
    OL actually looked good. Kirkland was better than McGary or James have been all year at RT and Eldrenkamp played well at LG. I agree that this game could have been a lot different if Browning hit even a couple of big throws. He missed almost every one.
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,390
    That Petersen was the wrong guy only 18 games into his tenure?

    HFNY said:

    It would be nice if the people who ran around crying that the sky was falling during the bye week could admit they went overboard....

    They might still be right though
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,913
    We get it. Everybody sucks. So even the team that wins the Natty this year should have an asterisk beside it because they were the least drecky.

    Mission accomplished.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    HFNY said:

    Yeah until further notice, this is still a 6 win team. Until the offense gets over the hump, ceiling isn't that great for 2015.

    If you were setting odds based on the last decade the smart money is still on UW sucking.

    In other words, they do until they don't. Last night was great. I'll watch it again tonight.

    But we better fucking beat Oregon.

    So why are you asking us to say we were wrong, when we were clearly right?