They go hand in hand, but if you disagree with this, you're hopeless.
Obviously you'll do better with 1st round NFL talent than you would with the kid in the wheelchair from Glee pounding the rock. But let's stop with this stupid fucking notion that recruiting fixes bad coaching.
At best it will mask bad coaching for a game here or there. But since your shitty coach will cost you a few games anyways, it makes no difference in the win total. Last time I checked, WINS were the only thing that mattered.
They go hand in hand, but if you disagree with this, you're hopeless.
Obviously you'll do better with 1st round NFL talent than you would with the kid in the wheelchair from Glee pounding the rock. But let's stop with this stupid fucking notion that recruiting fixes bad coaching.
At best it will mask bad coaching for a game here or there. But since your shitty coach will cost you a few games anyways, it makes no difference in the win total. Last time I checked, WINS were the only thing that mattered.
They go hand in hand, but if you disagree with this, you're hopeless.
Obviously you'll do better with 1st round NFL talent than you would with the kid in the wheelchair from Glee pounding the rock. But let's stop with this stupid fucking notion that recruiting fixes bad coaching.
At best it will mask bad coaching for a game here or there. But since your shitty coach will cost you a few games anyways, it makes no difference in the win total. Last time I checked, WINS were the only thing that mattered.
They go hand in hand, but if you disagree with this, you're hopeless.
Obviously you'll do better with 1st round NFL talent than you would with the kid in the wheelchair from Glee pounding the rock. But let's stop with this stupid fucking notion that recruiting fixes bad coaching.
At best it will mask bad coaching for a game here or there. But since your shitty coach will cost you a few games anyways, it makes no difference in the win total. Last time I checked, WINS were the only thing that mattered.
Read the post, dumb ass. He said that they go hand in hand. And he's right. No where did he say that recruiting masks bad coaching.
You really think Sark left UW like Teevens left Stanford?
Who's the doog now? Win or GTFO, right?
He inherited a heisman finalist running back and the current best CB in the NFL. Also Stanford has recruited well nationally forever because of academis, the problem is the higher ranked guys would get there, get soft, and play school instead of football. No question Harbaugh changed that culture.
His first few years he picked up some under the radar prospects that turned out to be pretty damn good players that supplanted upperclassmen and took their lumps. His 3rd recruiting class (just like Pete's at the moment) is when the bigger names really started to bite on Harbaugh. The higher foundation talent level, plus coached up no names turned star upperclassmen delivered his 4th season results. It's not that fucking difficult.
Wow I had no idea that Harbaugh inherited 17 returning starters (and unlike at some schools, those returning starters were pretty good).
OTOH, Washington has played 10 true freshmen play this season: OL Trey Adams, LB Tevis Bartlett, QB Jake Browning, LB Ben Burr-Kirven, TB Myles Gaskin, DB Austin Joyner, WR Chico McClatcher, DB Jordan Miller, WR Quinten Pounds and WR Isaiah Renfro.
The team's current roster includes 52 freshmen (true and redshirt) and 24 sophomores, as compared to 13 seniors.
But yeah, sooner rather than later, Petersen needs to pull an upset win (@ Arizona last year hurts that much more after the losses to BSU and Cal this year) and ideally doesn't lose another home game this year....that includes beating Oregon but the spread will probably be 8-10 points.
Harbaugh never took Stanford backwards. There lies the major difference.
Petersen has taken UW backwards and he gets a lot of slack an excuses made for it. From when he was hired, I haven't seen much to inspire a lot of confidence.
Fans are magnifying every single positive because they don't want to admit that he has been a disappointment so far.
Wow I had no idea that Harbaugh inherited 17 returning starters (and unlike at some schools, those returning starters were pretty good).
OTOH, Washington has played 10 true freshmen play this season: OL Trey Adams, LB Tevis Bartlett, QB Jake Browning, LB Ben Burr-Kirven, TB Myles Gaskin, DB Austin Joyner, WR Chico McClatcher, DB Jordan Miller, WR Quinten Pounds and WR Isaiah Renfro.
The team's current roster includes 52 freshmen (true and redshirt) and 24 sophomores, as compared to 13 seniors.
But yeah, sooner rather than later, Petersen needs to pull an upset win (@ Arizona last year hurts that much more after the losses to BSU and Cal this year) and ideally doesn't lose another home game this year....that includes beating Oregon but the spread will probably be 8-10 points.
Clearly you are the doog. Petersen inherited 3 first round draft choices
And they all left immediately after year 1. One of which was kicked off the team because he was not jiving with the team. Harbaugh got those guys as sophomores/rs frosh. Big difference.
Harbaugh is a better coach than Petersen, he's a top 5 coach in the world at any level, imo. Petersen's tenure is far from played out. I still think he is a good coach, the O is a disaster and he needs to figure it out, adapt, or gtfo. But draw a line in the sand 4 games into year 2 if you want.
I still think he is the guy, too much is going right in the program. The fucking Offense is the bulbous herp at the tip of the 12 incher. Get it cleaned up or DIAFF.
They go hand in hand, but if you disagree with this, you're hopeless.
Obviously you'll do better with 1st round NFL talent than you would with the kid in the wheelchair from Glee pounding the rock. But let's stop with this stupid fucking notion that recruiting fixes bad coaching.
At best it will mask bad coaching for a game here or there. But since your shitty coach will cost you a few games anyways, it makes no difference in the win total. Last time I checked, WINS were the only thing that mattered.
Read the post, dumb ass. He said that they go hand in hand. And he's right. No where did he say that recruiting masks bad coaching.
Whooooosh???
He agreed with me, and I agreed with him.
We are BOTH talking shit about you.
Old, poor, and dumb is no way to go through life son.
Harbaugh never took Stanford backwards. There lies the major difference.
Petersen has taken UW backwards and he gets a lot of slack an excuses made for it. From when he was hired, I haven't seen much to inspire a lot of confidence.
Fans are magnifying every single positive because they don't want to admit that he has been a disappointment so far.
Apples and Oranges ...
Not that far of a difference in saying that Seven never took the UW program backwards.
Comments
Accounting for stars per player they were 14th (3.5), 11th (3.56), 5th (3.81), and 10th (3.64).
Pete has sucked so far but Harbaugh inherited a team returning 17 starters and is loaded with talent and experience.
At best it will mask bad coaching for a game here or there. But since your shitty coach will cost you a few games anyways, it makes no difference in the win total. Last time I checked, WINS were the only thing that mattered.
Of course Mcilvane poor mouthed the talent when he came on board. Yet Florida is playing much better this year.
Because of coaching
He inherited a heisman finalist running back and the current best CB in the NFL. Also Stanford has recruited well nationally forever because of academis, the problem is the higher ranked guys would get there, get soft, and play school instead of football. No question Harbaugh changed that culture.
His first few years he picked up some under the radar prospects that turned out to be pretty damn good players that supplanted upperclassmen and took their lumps. His 3rd recruiting class (just like Pete's at the moment) is when the bigger names really started to bite on Harbaugh. The higher foundation talent level, plus coached up no names turned star upperclassmen delivered his 4th season results. It's not that fucking difficult.
OTOH, Washington has played 10 true freshmen play this season: OL Trey Adams, LB Tevis Bartlett, QB Jake Browning, LB Ben Burr-Kirven, TB Myles Gaskin, DB Austin Joyner, WR Chico McClatcher, DB Jordan Miller, WR Quinten Pounds and WR Isaiah Renfro.
The team's current roster includes 52 freshmen (true and redshirt) and 24 sophomores, as compared to 13 seniors.
But yeah, sooner rather than later, Petersen needs to pull an upset win (@ Arizona last year hurts that much more after the losses to BSU and Cal this year) and ideally doesn't lose another home game this year....that includes beating Oregon but the spread will probably be 8-10 points.
Petersen has taken UW backwards and he gets a lot of slack an excuses made for it. From when he was hired, I haven't seen much to inspire a lot of confidence.
Fans are magnifying every single positive because they don't want to admit that he has been a disappointment so far.
Harbaugh is a better coach than Petersen, he's a top 5 coach in the world at any level, imo. Petersen's tenure is far from played out. I still think he is a good coach, the O is a disaster and he needs to figure it out, adapt, or gtfo. But draw a line in the sand 4 games into year 2 if you want.
I still think he is the guy, too much is going right in the program. The fucking Offense is the bulbous herp at the tip of the 12 incher. Get it cleaned up or DIAFF.
He agreed with me, and I agreed with him.
We are BOTH talking shit about you.
Old, poor, and dumb is no way to go through life son.
Not that far of a difference in saying that Seven never took the UW program backwards.
You can't have it both ways.
If he can't win with them at UW, who cares if he made them better players for the pros.