Pm to HuskyFanInAZ

RoadDawg55

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

dnc

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.

TierbsHsotBoobs

dnc said:

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.

But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.

Fecal_Matter

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

dnc said:

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.

But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Fecal_Matter said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

dnc said:

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.

But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.

I'm saying win or get the fuck out.

Excuses are for losers.

GrundleStiltzkin

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Fecal_Matter said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

dnc said:

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.

But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.

I'm saying win or get the fuck out.

Excuses are for losers.

Boobs miserable schtick is our (?) immutable touchstone.

Dardanus

I (¿) approve this thread

RoadDawg55

Fecal_Matter said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

dnc said:

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.

But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.

That was before we lost to Cal. That is the problem. If we were struggling against LSU's defense it would be different, but Cal?

CuntWaffle

What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

HeretoBeatmyChest

CuntWaffle said:

What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

Abundance.

Sark's recruiting sucks.

Pete's offense sucks....so far.

Kaepsknee

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

CuntWaffle said:

What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

Abundance.

Sark's recruiting sucks.

Pete's offense sucks....so far.

There's still time to add the third option that maybe Peterman's recruit's suck too.

Abundance personified.

CuntWaffle

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

CuntWaffle said:

What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

Abundance.

Sark's recruiting sucks.

Pete's offense sucks....so far.

Agreed his offense sucks.

But if Sarks recruits were so bad that they got beat out by a bunch of freshman (not necessarily because they are good yet but because Sarks OL recruits are so bad) then I don't get the "we are choosing to play them". We are playing them because we would be even worse with Sarks noodle armed fags started.

TierbsHsotBoobs

CuntWaffle said:

What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited players

Tequilla

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

CuntWaffle said:

What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited players

Possible that some of the guys are unsalvageable dreck?

RoadDawg55

Fecal_Matter said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

dnc said:

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.

But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.

RoadDawg55 said:

If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.

I didn't say that a couple of weeks ago when UW didn't score a TD against Boise State.

CuntWaffle

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

CuntWaffle said:

What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited players

Still doesn't take away the fact that they are so terrible that even "developing" would lead to very minimal gain.

ThomasFremont

You can't expect to win without top tier talent at every position in the 2 deeps and the practice squad.

Fuck off.

RaceBannon

ThomasFremont said:

You can't expect to win without top tier talent at every position in the 2 deeps and the practice squad.

Fuck off.

This sounds familiar

ThomasFremont

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

You can't expect to win without top tier talent at every position in the 2 deeps and the practice squad.

Fuck off.

This sounds familiar

It's almost like there's a script.

dhdawg

Tequilla said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

CuntWaffle said:

What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited players

Possible that some of the guys are unsalvageable dreck?

yep they all suck no matter what. I hate Sark as much as the next guy but this is ridiculous.

Tequilla

dhdawg said:

Tequilla said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

CuntWaffle said:

What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited players

Possible that some of the guys are unsalvageable dreck?

yep they all suck no matter what. I hate Sark as much as the next guy but this is ridiculous.

I'm not trying to play the Seven vs Pete game ... but we've known for a while that the OL recruiting had some major misses/holes in it and that this was the year that if we were going to have some major issues with it it would be this year.

I have confidence with Strausser, but the reality is that we're starting 3 RS/True Frosh on the OL. That's not a strong testament of the talent that was inherited/remained after last year.