Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Serious question about gun control

2001400ex
2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
I am for the 2nd amendment and our right to bear arms. But there's some meaningful things we can do to save some lives. Such as background checks on all gun sales, limiting magazine sizes, restricting sales of some types of guns, better tracking of the internet to find people before they commit these crimes (it's amazing how many were public about their intent).

I don't want to limit freedoms, but if you post online that you are going to shoot up a school, is it not reasonable that you get questioned about it?

So really, the question is, why do some of you stick to "it's the 2nd amendment, there should be zero restrictions on guns"?
«1

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Fuck off

    That was quick. That's the intelligent response I expected from race.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    The other three threads agree with me

    fuck off

    Sounds like you care.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    No it doesn't

    Sounds like you're a retard
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Oregon just passed gun control measures.

    Everyone here is taking about what a big difference they made.

    Who has represented gun control would stop every incident. Just like seat belts don't save every life. What if it reduces it in half? Is that not worth it?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Oregon just passed gun control measures.

    Everyone here is taking about what a big difference they made.

    Who has represented gun control would stop every incident. Just like seat belts don't save every life. What if it reduces it in half? Is that not worth it?
    Gun control laws just need more time to get their own gun control laws in
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    Gun control laws worked harder then ever this summer and really bought in

    were they tanned, rested and ready?

    did they pass the 'eye' test?

    how many stars did scout give them?

  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    2001400ex said:

    Oregon just passed gun control measures.

    Everyone here is taking about what a big difference they made.

    Who has represented gun control would stop every incident. Just like seat belts don't save every life. What if it reduces it in half? Is that not worth it?
    no.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    Slippery slope.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,883 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    Slippery slope.

    image
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Swaye said:

    Slippery slope.

    Faggoty excuse.
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Swaye said:

    Slippery slope.

    Faggoty excuse.
    I'm glad an expert weighed in.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleJ said:

    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.

    The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?

    That's the stupidest thing ever.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.

    The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?

    That's the stupidest thing ever.
    Axe Ukraine.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.

    The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?

    That's the stupidest thing ever.
    Axe Ukraine.
    You are stupid. And gullible.
  • Blackie
    Blackie Member Posts: 499
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.

    The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?

    That's the stupidest thing ever.
    funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.

    The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?

    That's the stupidest thing ever.
    funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
    Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
  • Blackie
    Blackie Member Posts: 499
    2001400ex said:

    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.

    The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?

    That's the stupidest thing ever.
    funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
    Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
    and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.

    The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?

    That's the stupidest thing ever.
    funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
    Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
    and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
    Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
  • Blackie
    Blackie Member Posts: 499
    edited October 2015
    2001400ex said:

    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.

    The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?

    That's the stupidest thing ever.
    funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
    Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
    and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
    Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
    No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.

    Nice try.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.

    The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?

    That's the stupidest thing ever.
    funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
    Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
    and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
    Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
    No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.

    Nice try.
    So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.

    See the problem there?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    Blackie said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.

    The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?

    That's the stupidest thing ever.
    funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"
    Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.
    and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.
    Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.
    No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.

    Nice try.
    So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.

    See the problem there?
    Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?
    Nothing I guess. Driving over cars and shooting buildings would just be part of the beautification process.