Serious question about gun control

I don't want to limit freedoms, but if you post online that you are going to shoot up a school, is it not reasonable that you get questioned about it?
So really, the question is, why do some of you stick to "it's the 2nd amendment, there should be zero restrictions on guns"?
Comments
-
Fuck off
-
That was quick. That's the intelligent response I expected from race.RaceBannon said:Fuck off
-
The other three threads agree with me
fuck off -
Sounds like you care.RaceBannon said:The other three threads agree with me
fuck off -
No it doesn't
Sounds like you're a retard -
Oregon just passed gun control measures.
Everyone here is taking about what a big difference they made. -
Gun control laws worked harder then ever this summer and really bought in
-
Who has represented gun control would stop every incident. Just like seat belts don't save every life. What if it reduces it in half? Is that not worth it?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Oregon just passed gun control measures.
Everyone here is taking about what a big difference they made. -
Gun control laws just need more time to get their own gun control laws in2001400ex said:
Who has represented gun control would stop every incident. Just like seat belts don't save every life. What if it reduces it in half? Is that not worth it?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Oregon just passed gun control measures.
Everyone here is taking about what a big difference they made. -
There are zero murders from citizens with guns in North Korea.
Sure gets hungry there tho when Great Leader wants to make a point on the people who don't listen so well. -
were they tanned, rested and ready?RaceBannon said:Gun control laws worked harder then ever this summer and really bought in
did they pass the 'eye' test?
how many stars did scout give them?
-
no.2001400ex said:
Who has represented gun control would stop every incident. Just like seat belts don't save every life. What if it reduces it in half? Is that not worth it?TierbsHsotBoobs said:Oregon just passed gun control measures.
Everyone here is taking about what a big difference they made. -
Slippery slope.
-
Swaye said:
Slippery slope.
-
Faggoty excuse.Swaye said:Slippery slope.
-
-
-
It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
-
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
Axe Ukraine.2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
You are stupid. And gullible.PurpleJ said:
Axe Ukraine.2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
You can't afford it.
-
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.Blackie said:
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever. -
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.2001400ex said:
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.Blackie said:
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever.
Nice try. -
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.Blackie said:
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.2001400ex said:
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.Blackie said:
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever.
Nice try.
See the problem there? -
Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?2001400ex said:
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.Blackie said:
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.2001400ex said:
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.Blackie said:
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever.
Nice try.
See the problem there? -
Nothing I guess. Driving over cars and shooting buildings would just be part of the beautification process.Blackie said:
Is it not roadworthy? What's the problem with driving it through downtown?2001400ex said:
So I buy a tank. Because that's cool. Then one day I decide to drive it through downtown Seattle.Blackie said:
No. Any free person should be able to own weapons. Assault/battery/killing/etc of humans with or without the use of weapons is (and should be) illegal.2001400ex said:
Oh so anyone who owns a gun for aggression shouldn't be able to own one? Got it.Blackie said:
and I honestly would have zero problem with you being able to build or buy them, assuming you were using them for defense and not aggression.2001400ex said:
Ok, then I want to own a tank and bazooka.Blackie said:
funny thing, the 2A refers to "arms" not "guns"2001400ex said:
The government has tanks and airplanes. Seriously. Wtf is a gun going to do?PurpleJ said:It's all about authority and control. Jack shit to do with saving lives, and if you believe that line you deserve to be lined up and shot. If the government gave a shit about your life they wouldn't pimp pharmaceuticals and abortion. You have the rights to own a gun, just as long as it's the type they want you to have. 100 million people with full autos would endanger the establishment. Can't have that.
That's the stupidest thing ever.
Nice try.
See the problem there?